Comparison of different outcome instruments following foot and ankle trauma

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1075-1080

  Goldstein, Christina L ^a   Schemitsch, Emil ^a   Bhandari, Mohit ^a   Mathew, George ^a   Petrisor, Brad A ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Correlation; Foot and ankle; Outcome measures; Trauma

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; ANKLE HINDFOOT SCALE; ANKLE INJURY; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOOT AND ANKLE ABILITY MEASURE; FOOT AND ANKLE QUESTIONNAIRE AND AMERICAN ORTHOPEDIC FOOT AND ANKLE SOCIETY; FOOT FUNCTION INDEX; FOOT INJURY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 12; SHORT MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANKLE INJURIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOOT INJURIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650324813     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2010.1075     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Agel, J; Beskin, JL; Brage, M; et al.: Reliability of the Foot Function Index: A report of the AOFAS outcomes committee. Foot Ankle Int. 26(11):962-967, 2005.
2. Alonso, A; Khoury, L; Adams, R: Clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury: Reliability and prediction of return to function. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2794:276-284, 1998.
3. Audigé, L; Bhandari, M; Hanson, B; et al.: A concept for the validation of fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma. 19:404-409, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.bot.0000155310.04886.37.
4. Beaton, DE; Schemitsch, E: Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function. Clin Orthop. 413:90-105, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01. blo.0000079772.06654.c8. (Pubitemid 38063303)
5. Budiman-Mak, E; Conrad, KJ; Roach, KE: The Foot Function Index: A measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:561-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90220-4.
6. Button, G; Pinney, S: A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: Is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot & Ankle Int. 25(8):521-525, 2004.
7. Brown, OL; Dirshchl, DR; Obremskey, WT: Incidence of hardwarerelated pain and its effect on functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 15(4):271-274, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200105000-00006.
8. Carcia, CR; Martin, RL; Drouin, JM: Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability. J Athlet Train. 43(2):179-183, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.179.
9. Cross, KM; Worrell, TW; Leslie, JE; et al.: The relationship between self-reported and clinical measures and the number of days to return to sport following acute lateral ankle sprains. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 32(1):16-23, 2002.
10. Egol, K; Sheikhazadeh, A; Mogatederi, S; et al.: Lower-extremity function for driving an automobile after operative treatment of ankle fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 85(7):1185-1189, 2003.
11. Egol, K; Tejwani, N; Walsh, MG; et al.: Predictors of short-term functional outcome following ankle fracture surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88(5):974-979, 2006.
12. Gautier, E; Kolker, D; Jakob, RP: Treatment of cartilage defects of the talus by autologous osteochondral grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 84:237-244, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00343.
13. Guyatt, GH; Feeny, DH; Patrick, DL: Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 118(8):622-629, 1993.
14. Guyton, GP: Theoretical limitations of the AOFAS scoring systems: An analysis using Monte Carlo Modeling. Foot Ankle Int. 22(10):779-787, 2001.
15. Haddad SL; Coetzee JD; Estok R; et al.: Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89:1899-1905, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01149.
16. Herron. ML: A review of outcome measures for the ankle and hindfoot. Foot Ankle Surg. 12:161-167, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2006.03.002.
17. Herscovici, D, Jr; Widmaier, J; Scaduto, JM; et al.: Operative treatment of calcaneal fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87(6):1260-1264, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.01765.
18. Hurst, NP; Ruta, DA; Kind, P: Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF-12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 37(8):862-869, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ rheumatology/37.8.862. (Pubitemid 128693618)
19. Ibrahim, T; Beiri, A; Azzabi, M; et al.: Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. J Foot and Ankle Surg. 46(2):65-74, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1053/j.jfas.2006.12.002.
20. Jaeschke, R; Singer, J; Guyatt, GH: Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 10(4):407-415, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6.
21. Johanson, NA; Liang, MH; Daltroy, L; et al.: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Lower Limb Outcomes Assessment Instruments. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86:902-909, 2004.
22. Kitaoka, HB; Alexander, IJ; Adelaar, RS; et al.: Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot; midfoot; hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 15(7):349-353, 1994.
23. Landis, JR; Koch, GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33:159-174, 1977.
24. Lau, JTC; Mahomed, NM; Schon, LC: Results of an internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members. Foot Ankle Int. 26(6):479-482, 2005.
25. Lee, CE; Browell, LM; Jones, DL: Measuring health in patients with cervical and lumbosacral spinal disorders: is the 12-item short-form health survey a valid alternative for the 36-item short-form health survey? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 89(5):829-833, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.056.
26. Lochner, HV; Bhandari, M; Tornetta, P, III: Type-II error rates (beta errors) of randomized trials in orthopaedic trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 83:1650-1655, 2003.
27. Luo, X; Lynn, GM; Kakouras, I; et al.: Reliability; validity and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain. Spine. 28(15):1739-1745, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632- 200308010-00020.
28. Martin, RL; Irrgang, JJ; Burdett, RG; et al.: Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 26(11):968-983, 2005.
29. Martin, RL; Irrgang, JJ; Lalonde KA; et al.: Current concepts review: Foot and ankle outcome instruments. Foot Ankle Int. 27(5):383-390, 2006.
30. Martin, RL; Irrgang, JJ: A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 37(2):72-84, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2007.2403.
31. Musculoskeletal Injuries. In United States Bone and Joint Decade: The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. Rosemont; IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2008. Available at http://www. boneandjointburden.org/. Accessed October 22; 2008.
32. Nishikawa, M; Tomita, T; Fujii, M; et al.: Total ankle replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. Int Orthop. 28:123-126, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00264-003-0512-3.
33. Nishisato, N; Torii, Y: Effects of categorizing continuous normal distributions on the product-moment correlation. Jpn Psychol Res. 13:45-49, 1970.
34. Obremskey, WT; Brown, O; Driver, R; et al.: Comparison of SF-36 and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment in recovery from fixation of unstable ankle fractures. Orthopedics. 30(2):145-151, 2007.
35. Patrick, DL; Deyo, RA: Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 27(3 Suppl): S217-S232, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198903001-00018.
36. Pena, F; Agel, J; Coetzee, C: Comparison of the MFA to the AOFAS outcome tool in a population undergoing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 28(7):788-793, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2006.0788.
37. Saag, KG; Saltzman, CL; Brown, CK; et al.: The Foot Function Index for measuring rheumatoid arthritis pain: evaluating side-to-side reliability. Foot Ankle Int. 17(8):506-510, 1996.
38. Sanders DW; Bussam M; Hattwick E; etal.: Functional outcomes following displaced talar neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 18(5):265-270, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200405000-00001.
39. Schepers, T; Heetveld, MJ; Mulder, PGH; et al.: Clinical outcome scoring of intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 47(3):213-218, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2008.02.014.
40. Singh, A; Gnanalingham, K; Casey, A; et al.: Quality of life assessment using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Comparison with SF-36. Spine. 31(6):639-643, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000202744.48633.44.
41. SooHoo, NF; Samimi, DV; Vyas, RM; et al.: Evaluation of the validity of the Foot Function Index in measuring outcomes in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Foot Ankle Int. 27(1):38-42, 2006.
42. SooHoo, NF; Shuler, M; Fleming, LL: Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS clinical rating systems by correlation to the SF-36. Foot Ankle Int. 24(1):50-55, 2003.
43. SooHoo, NF; Vyas, R; Samimi, D: Responsiveness of the Foot Function index; AOFAS clinical rating systems and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 27(11):930-934, 2006.
44. Swiontkowski, MF; Engelberg, R; Martin, DP; et al.: Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire: Validity; reliability and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 81:1245-1260, 1999.
45. Ware, JE, Jr.; Kosinski, M; Keller, SD: A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. J Med Care. 34(3):220-233, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005650- 199603000-00003.
46. Ware, JE; Kosinski, M; Turner-Bowker, DM; et al.: User's manual for the SF-12v2 Health Survey. QualityMetric health Outcomes Solutions. 2007.
47. Weening, B; Bhandari, M: Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 19(2):102-108, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200502000-00006.
48. Westberry, DE; Davids, JR; Oros, W: Surgical management of symptomatic talocalcaneal coalitions by resection of the sustentaculum tali. J Pediatr Orthop. 23(4):493-497, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004694-200307000-00015.
49. Wilson, RW; Gieck, JH; Gansneder, BM; et al.: Reliability and responsiveness of disablement measures following acute ankle sprains among athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 27(5):348-355, 1998.
50. Zahrai, A; MacDonald, C; Rooney, J; et al.: Performance of three disease-specific and two generic measures of outcome in patients with talar neck fractures. OTA Annual Meeting 2005. Scientific Poster #85. Available at http://www.hwbf.org/ota/am/ota05/otapo/OTP05085.htm. Accessed October 27; 2008.