Results of an internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 479-482

  Lau, Johnny T C ^a,b   Mahomed, Nizar M ^a,b   Schon, Lew C ^a,c  

^a UHN Toronto Western Hospital ^*

^b TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c UNION MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Ankle Arthritis; Internet; Outcome; Survey

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN ORTHOPEDIC FOOT AND ANKLE SOCIETY SCORE; ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY; ANKLE SCORE; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; FOOT FUNCTION INDEX; HEALTH SURVEY; INTERNET; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MUSCULOSKELETAL OUTCOMES DATA EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCORE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 20144383890     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107110070502600609     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bellamy, N; Buchanan, WW; Goldsmith, CH; Campbell, J; Stitt, LW: Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J. Rheumatol. 15:1833-1840, 1988.
2. Bennett, PJ; Patterson, C; Wearing, S; Baglioni, T: Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 88:419-428, 1998.
3. Budiman-Mak, E; Conrad, KJ; Roach, KE: The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 44:561-570, 1991.
4. Buechel, FF; Pappas, MJ; Iorio, LJ: New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases. Foot Ankle 8:279-290, 1988.
5. Daly, PJ; Kitaoka, HB; Chao, EYS: Plantar fasciotomy for intractable plantar fasciitis: Clinical results and biomechanical evaluation. Foot Ankle 13:188-195, 1992.
6. Domsic, RT; Saltzman, CL: Ankle osteoarthritis scale. Foot Ankle Int. 19:466-471, 1998.
7. Etter, JF; Perneger, TV: A comparison of cigarette smokers recruited through the Internet or by mail. Int. J. Epidemiol. 30:521-525, 2001.
8. Garrow, AP; Papageorgiou, AC; Silman, AJ; Thomas, E; Jayson, MI; Macfarlane, GJ: Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess disabling foot pain. Pain 85:107-113, 2000.
9. Gruen, GS; Mears, DC: Arthrodesis of the ankle and subtalar joints. Clin. Orthop. 268:15-20, 1991.
10. Jones, R; Pitt, N: Health surveys in the workplace: comparison of postal, email and World Wide Web methods. Occup. Med. (Lond) 49:556-558, 1999.
11. Karlsson, J; Peterson, L: Evaluation of ankle joint function: the use of a scoring scale. The Foot 1:15-19, 1991.
12. Kitaoka, HB; Alexander, IJ; Adelaar, RS; Nunley, JA; Myerson, MS; Sanders, M: Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 15:349-353, 1994.
13. Kitaoka, HB; Anderson, PJ; Morrey, BF: Revision of ankle arthrodesis with external fixation for non- union. J. Bone Joint Surg. 74A:1191-1200, 1992.
14. Kitaoka, HB; Romness, DW: Arthrodesis for failed ankle arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 7:277-284, 1992.
15. Lau, JTC; Koo, M; Davey, JR; Schemitsch, EH; Waddell, JP; Mahomed, NN: Determining the commonly used hip measures for total hip arthroplasty. Presented at the 55th Annual meeting of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association, Edmonton, AB, June 6, 2000.
16. Mazur, JM; Schwartz, E; Simon, SR: Ankle arthrodesis. Long-term follow-up with gait analysis. J. Bone Joint Surg. 61A:964-975, 1979.
17. Paolo, AM; Bonaminio, GA; Gibson, C; Partridge, T; Kallail, K: Response rate comparisons of e-mail- and mail-distributed student evaluations. Teach. Learn. Med. 12:81-84, 2000.
18. Saag, KG; Saltzman, CL; Brown, CK; Budiman-Mak, E: The Foot Function Index for measuring rheumatoid arthritis pain: evaluating side-to-side reliability. Foot Ankle Int. 17:506-510, 1996.