The polygraph and forensic psychiatry

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 446-451

  Grubin, Don ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION;

FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMANS; LIE DETECTION;

EID: 78650311772     PISSN: 10936793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (39)

1. Collodi C: Pinocchio. Translated by Harden E. London: Penguin Books, 1974
2. DePaulo BM, Rosenthal R: Telling lies. J Pers Soc Psychol 37: 1713-1722, 1979
3. Vrij A: Detecting Lies and Deceit (ed 2). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 2008
4. Zuckerman M, Spiegel NH, DePaulo BM, et al: Nonverbal strategies for decoding deception. J Nonverb Behav 6:171-187, 1982
5. DePaulo BM, Pfeifer RL: On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. J Appl Soc Psychol 16:249-267, 1986
6. Kraut RE, Poe D: On the line: the deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen. J Pers Soc Psychol 39:784-798, 1980
7. Ekman P, O'Sullivan M: Who can catch a liar? Am Psychol 46: 913-920, 1991
8. Rogers R: Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception (ed 3). Edited by Rogers R. New York: Guilford Press, 2008
9. Knight J: The truth about lying. Nature 428:692-694, 2004
10. National Research Council: The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003
11. Kleiner M: Physiological detection of deception in psychological perspectives: a theoretical proposal, in Handbook of Polygraph Testing. Edited by Kleiner M. London: Academic Press, 2002, pp 127-182
12. Bell BG, Grubin D: Functional magnetic resonance imaging may promote theoretical understanding of the polygraph test. J Forensic Psychol Psychiatry 21:52-65, 2010
13. Senter S, Weatherman D, Krapohl D, et al: A proposal for reconciling theory and terminology in polygraph testing. Polygraph 39:109-117, 2010
14. Adler K: The Lie Detectors: The History of An American Obsession. New York: Free Press, 2007
15. Grubin D: A trial of voluntary polygraphy testing in 10 English probation areas. Sex Abuse 22:266-278, 2010
16. Fiedler K, Schmid J, Stahl T: What is the current truth about polygraph lie detection? Basic Appl Soc Psychol 24:313-324, 2002
17. Cross T, Saxe L: Polygraph testing and sexual abuse: the lure of the magic lasso. Child Maltreatment 6:195-206, 2001
18. Jones EE, Sigall H: The bogus pipeline: a new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychol Bull 76:349-364, 1971
19. Lykken DT: A tremor in the blood: uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: Plenum Press, 1998
20. Honts CR, Hodes RL, Raskin DC: Effects of physical countermeasures on the physiological detection of deception. J Appl Psychol 70:177-187, 1985
21. Segrave K: Lie Detectors: A Social History. Jefferson, NC: Mc-Farland & Company, 2004
22. Honts CR, Perry MV: Polygraph admissibility. Law Hum Behav 16:357-379, 1992
23. Frye V. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923)
24. Daubert V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)
25. Abrams S, Ogard E: Polygraph surveillance of probationers. Polygraph 15:174-182, 1986
26. Abrams S, Simmons G: Post-conviction polygraph testing: then and now. Polygraph 29:63-67, 2000
27. English K, Jones L, Pasini-Hill D, et al: The Value of Polygraph Testing in Sex Offender Management. Research report submitted to the National Institute of Justice. Denver: Colorado Department of Public Safety, 2000
28. McGrath RJ, Cumming GF, Burchard BL, et al: Current Practices and Trends in Sexual Abuser Management: The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press, 2010
29. Grubin D, Madsen L, Parsons S, et al: A prospective study of the impact of polygraphy on high-risk behaviors in adult sex offenders. Sex Abuse 16:209-222, 2004
30. Madsen L, Parsons S, Grubin, D: A preliminary study of the contribution of periodic polygraph testing to the treatment and supervision of sex offenders. Br J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol 15:682-695, 2004
31. Ahlmeyer S, Heil P, McKee B, et al: The impact of polygraphy on admissions of victims and offenses in adult sexual offenders. Sex Abuse 12:123-139, 2000
32. McGrath RJ, Cumming GF, Hoke SE, et al: Outcomes in a community sex offender treatment program: a comparison between polygraphed and matched non-polygraphed offenders. Sex Abuse 19:381-393, 2007
33. McKune V. Lile, 224 F.3d 1175 (10th Cir. 2000), rev'd, 536 U.S. 24 (2002)
34. Grubin D: The case for polygraph testing of sex offenders. Legal Criminol Psychol 13:177-189, 2008
35. British Psychological Society: A Review of the Current Scientific Status and Fields of Application of Polygraphic Deception Detection. Report (26/05/04) from the BPS Working Party at http://www.bps.org.uk. Accessed September 10, 2010
36. Kokish R, Levenson J, Blasingame G: Post-conviction sex offender polygraph examination: client-reported perceptions of utility and accuracy. Sex Abuse 17:211-221, 2005
37. Grubin D, Madsen L: The accuracy and utility of post conviction polygraph testing with sex offenders. Br J Psychiatry 188:479-83, 2006
38. Patrick CJ, Iacono WG: Psychopathy, threat, and polygraph test accuracy. J App Psychol 74:347-355, 1989
39. Raskin DC, Hare RD: Psychopathy and detection of deception in a prison population. Psychophysiology 15:126-136, 1978