Differential forage use makes carrying capacity equivocal on ranges of Scandinavian moose (Alces alces)

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 88, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1179-1191

  Wam, Hilde Karine ^a   Hjeljord, Olav ^a   Solberg, Erling Johan ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROWSING; CARRYING CAPACITY; DEER; DEMOGRAPHIC TREND; DICOTYLEDON; DIET; FOOD AVAILABILITY; FORAGE; POPULATION DENSITY; RANGE SIZE;

ALCES ALCES; BETULA; MYRTILLUS; UNGULATA; VACCINIUM; VACCINIUM MYRTILLUS;

EID: 78650282137     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: 14803283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/Z10-084     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Albon, S.D., Clutton-Brock, T.H., and Guinness, F.E. 1987. Early development and population dynamics in red deer. II. Densityindependent effects and cohort variation. J. Anim. Ecol. 56(1): 69-81. doi:10.2307/4800.
2. Andersen, R., Mysterud, A., and Lund, E. 2004. Ra°dyret - det lille storviltet. Naturforlaget, Oslo. [In Norwegian.]
3. Arnborg, T. 1946. Om va°rtbjörkens och glasbjörkens sta°ndortskrav. Skogen, 33: 163-165. [In Swedish.]
4. Beckerman, A., Benton, T.G., Ranta, E., Kaitala, V., and Lundberg, P. 2002. Population dynamics consequences of delayed lifehistory effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17(6): 263-269. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02469-2.
5. Bergström, R., and Danell, K. 1987. Effects of simulated winter browsing by moose on morphology and biomass of two birch species. J. Ecol. 75(2): 533-544. doi:10.2307/2260432.
6. Bergström, R., and Hjeljord, O. 1987. Moose and vegetation interactions in northwestern Europe and Poland. Swed. Wildl. Res. Suppl. 1: 213-228.
7. Bjar, G., Selas, V., Lund, L., and Hjeljord, O. 1991. Movement and home range dynamics of roe deer, Capreolus capreolus L., in southeastern Norway. Fauna Norv. Ser. A, 12: 12-18.
8. Bryant, J.P., Chapin, F.S., III, and Klein, D.R. 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos, 40(3): 357-368. doi:10.2307/3544308.
9. Caughley, G. 1977. Analysis of vertebrate populations. Wiley Interscience, London.
10. Cederlund, G., and Markgren, G. 1987. The development of the Swedish moose population, 1970-1983. Swed. Wildl. Res. Suppl. 1: 55-63.
11. Cederlund, G., and Sand, H.K. 1992. Dispersal of subadult moose Alces alces in a nonmigratory population. Can. J. Zool. 70(7): 1309-1314. doi:10.1139/z92-183.
12. Cowan, I.McT., Hoar, W.S., and Hatter, J. 1950. The effect of forest succession upon the quantity and upon the nutritive values of woody plants used as food by moose. Can. J. Zool. 28: 249-271.
13. Danell, K. 1982. Shoot growth of Betula pendula and B. pubescens in relation to moose browsing. Alces, 18: 197-209.
14. Danell, K., and Bergström, R. 1986. Winter browsing by moose on two birch species: impact on food resources. Oikos, 54(1): 1-18. doi:10.2307/3565866.
15. Danell, K., and Ericson, L. 1986. Foraging by moose on two species of birch when these occur in different proportions. Holarct. Ecol. 9(2): 79-84. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1986.tb01194.x.
16. Danell, K., Huss-Danell, K., and Bergström, R. 1985. Interactions between browsing moose and two species of birch in Sweden. Ecology, 66(6): 1867-1878. doi:10.2307/2937382.
17. Danell, K., Haukioja, E., and Huss-Danell, K. 1997. Morphological and chemical responses of mountain birch leaves and shoots to winter browsing along a gradient of plant productivity. Ecoscience, 4: 296-303.
18. Ericsson, G., Ball, J.P., and Danell, K. 2002. Body mass of moose calves along an altitudinal gradient. J. Wildl. Manage. 66(1): 91-97. doi:10.2307/3802875.
19. Forsyth, D.M., and Caley, P. 2006. Testing the irruptive paradigm of large-herbivore dynamics. Ecology, 87(2): 297-303. doi:10.1890/05-0709. PMID:16637354.
20. Fremstad, E. 1997. Vegetasjonstyper I Norge. NINA Temahefte, 12: 1-279. [In Norwegian.]
21. Gaillard, J.M., Loison, A., Toigo, C., Delorme, D., and van Laere, G. 2003. Cohort effects and deer poplution dynamics. Ecoscience, 10: 412-420.
22. Garcia-Gonzalez, R. 1984. L'emploi des epidermes végétaux dans la determination du regime alimentaire de l'Isard dans les yré-nées occidentales. É cologie des Milieux Montagnards et de Haute Altitude. Documents d'É cologie Pyrénéenne, III-V: 307-313.
23. Hamilton, J.G., Zangerl, A.R., DeLucia, E.H., and Berenbaum, M.R. 2001. The carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis: its rise and fall. Ecol. Lett. 4(1): 86-95. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00192.x.
24. Happe, P.J., Jenkins, K.J., Starkey, E.E., and Sharrow, S.H. 1990. Nutrional quality and tannin astringency of browse in clear-cuts and old-growth forests. J. Wildl. Manage. 54(4): 557-566. doi:10.2307/3809349.
25. Hatter, I.W., and Bergerud, W.A. 1991. Moose recruitment, adult mortality and rate of change. Alces, 27: 65-73.
26. Haveraaen, O., and Hjeljord, O. 1981. Forbedring av elgens (Alces alces) vinterbeite ved hogst og gjødsling av bjørk (Betula pubescens var. tortuosa) i Gausdal Vestfjell. Meldinger fra Norges Landbrukshøgskole, 60: 1-16. [In Norwegian.]
27. Herfindal, I., Solberg, E.J., Sæther, B.-E., Høgda, K.A., and Andersen, R. 2006a. Environmental phenology and geographical gradients in moose body mass. Oecologia (Berl.), 150(2): 213-224. doi:10.1007/s00442-006-0519-8.
28. Herfindal, I., Saether, B.-E., Solberg, E.J., Andersen, R., and Høgda, K.A. 2006b. Population characteristics predict responses in moose body mass to temporal variation in the environment. J. Anim. Ecol. 75(5): 1110-1118. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01138.x. PMID:16922846.
29. Histøl, T., and Hjeljord, O. 1995. Moose ranges of southern Norway, quality and carrying capacity. IBN Viltrapport 1. [In Norwegian.]
30. Hjeljord, O., and Histøl, T. 1999. Range-body mass interactions of a northern ungulate - a test of hypothesis. Oecologia (Berl.), 119(3): 326-339. doi:10.1007/s004420050793.
31. Hjeljord, O., Sundstøl, F., and Haagenrud, H. 1982. The nutritional value of browse to moose. J. Wildl. Manage. 46(2): 333-343. doi:10.2307/3808644.
32. Hjeljord, O., Høvik, N., and Pedersen, H.B. 1990. Choice of feeding sites by moose during summer: the influence of forest structure and plant phenology. Holarct. Ecol. 13: 281-292.
33. Hofmann, R.R. 1985. Digestive physiology of deer - their morphophysiological specialization and adaptation. In Biology of deer production. Edited by K.R. Drews and P.F. Fennessy. Bulletin No. 22, Royal Society of New Zealand, Wellington. pp. 393-407.
34. Launchbaugh, K.L., and Howery, L.D. 2005. Understanding landscape use patterns of livestock as a consequence of foraging behaviour. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 58(2): 99-108. doi:10.2111/03-146.1.
35. Lavsund, S., Nygren, T., and Solberg, E.J. 2003. Status of moose populations and challenges to moose management in Fennoscandia. Alces, 39: 109-130.
36. Leopold, A. 1949. The Sand County almanac, and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, New York.
37. Lundberg, P., AstrØm, M., and Danell, K. 1990. An experimental test of frequency-dependent food selection: winter browsing by moose. Holarct. Ecol. 13: 177-182.
38. Mansson, J. 2009. Environmental variation and moose Alces alces density as determinants of spatio-temporal heterogenity in browsing. Ecography, 32(4): 601-612. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05713.x.
39. Mansson, J., Kalen, C., Kjellander, P., Andren, H., and Smith, H. 2007. Quantitative estimates of tree species selectivity by moose (Alces alces) in a forest landscape. Scand. J. For. Res. 22(5): 407-414. doi:10.1080/02827580701515023.
40. McArt, S.H., Spalinger, D.E., Collins, W.B., Schoen, E.R., Stevenson, T., and Bucho, M. 2009. Summer dietary nitrogen availability as a potential bottom-up constraint on moose in south-central Alaska. Ecology, 90(5): 1400-1411. doi:10.1890/08-1435.1.PMID:19537559.
41. Moen, A. 1999. National atlas of Norway: vegetation. Norwegian Mapping Authority, Hønefoss.
42. Mysterud, A. 1998. Habitat selection by roe deer relative to resource distribution and spatiotemporal scale. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
43. Nicholson, M.C., Bowyer, R.T., and Kie, J.G. 2006. Forage selection by mule deer: does niche breadth increase with population density? J. Zool. (Lond.), 269(1): 39-49. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00051.x.
44. Odum, E.P. 1983. Fundamentals of ecology. 3rd ed. CBS College Publishing, New York.
45. Ohlson, M. and Staaland, H. 2001. Mineral diversity in wild plants: benefits and bane for moose. Oikos, 94(3): 442-454. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.940307.x.
46. Oldemeyer, J.L., Franzmann, A.W., Brundage, A.L., Arneson, P.D., and Flynn, A. 1977. Browse quality and the Kenai moose population. J. Wildl. Manage. 41(3): 533-542. doi:10.2307/3800528.
47. Peek, J.M., Urich, D.L., and Mackie, R.J. 1976. Moose habitat selection and relationships to forest management in northeastern Minnesota. Wildl. Monogr. No. 48.
48. Persson, I.-L., Danell, K., and Bergström, R. 2005. Different moose densities and accompanied changes in tree morphology and browse production. Ecol. Appl. 15(4): 1296-1305. doi:10.1890/04-0499.
49. Persson, I.-L., Bergström, R., and Danell, K. 2007. Browse biomass production and regrowth capacity after biomass loss in deciduous and coniferous trees: responses to moose browsing along a productivity gradient. Oikos, 116(10): 1639-1650. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15946.x.
50. Renecker, L.A., and Schwartz, C.C. 1998. Food habits and feeding behavior. In Ecology and management of the North American moose. Edited by A.W. Franzmann and C.C. Schwartz. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C. pp. 403-439.
51. Sæther, B.-E., and Andersen, R. 1990. Resource limitation in a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces: ecological con-straints on behavioural decisions. Can. J. Zool. 68(5): 993-999. doi:10.1139/z90-143.
52. Sæther, B.-E., and Heim, M. 1993. Ecological correlates of individual variation in age at maturity in female moose (Alces alces): the effects of environmental variability. J. Anim. Ecol. 62(3): 482-489. doi:10.2307/5197.
53. Sand, H. 1996. Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions. Oecologia (Berl.), 106(2): 212-220. doi:10.1007/BF00328601.
54. Sayre, N. 2008. The genesis, history, and limits of carrying capacity. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 98(1): 120-134. doi:10.1080/00045600701734356.
55. Schwartz, C.C., and Renecker, L.A. 1998. Nutrition and energetics. In Ecology and management of the North American moose. Edited by A.W. Franzmann and C.C. Schwartz. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C. pp. 441-478.
56. Solberg, E.J., and Sæther, B.-E. 1994. Male traits as life-history variables: annual variation in body mass and antler size in moose (Alces alces). J. Mammal. 75(4): 1069-1079. doi:10.2307/1382491.
57. Solberg, E.J., and Sæther, B.-E. 1999. Hunter observations of moose Alces alces as a management tool. Wildl. Biol. 5: 43-53.
58. Solberg, E.J., Sæther, B.-E., Strand, O., and Loison, A. 1999. Dynamics of a harvested moose population in a variable environment. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 186-204. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00275.x.
59. Solberg, E.J., Loison, A., Gaillard, J.-M., and Heim, M. 2004. Lasting effects of conditions at birth on moose body mass. Ecography, 27(5): 677-687. doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03864.x.
60. Solberg, E.J., Grøtan, V., Rolandsen, C.M., Brøseth, H., and Brainerd, S. 2005. Change-in-sex ratio as an estimator of population size for Norwegian moose Alces alces. Wildl. Biol. 11(2): 163-172. doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2005)11[163:CRAAEO]2.0.CO;2.
61. Solberg, E.J., Rolandsen, C.M., Heim, M., Grøtan, V., Garel, M., Sæther, B.-E., Nilsen, E.B., Austrheim, G., and Herfindal, I. 2006. Moose in Norway - an analysis of material collected by moose hunters 1966-2004. NINA Rapport 125. [English abstract.]
62. Solberg, E.J., Garel, M., Heim, M., Grøtan, V., and Sæther, B.-E. 2008. Lack of compensatory body growth in a high performance moose Alces alces population. Oecologia (Berl.), 158(3): 485-498. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1158-z.
63. Solberg, E.J., Røed, K.H., Flagstad, Ø., Sæther, B.-E., Heim, M., Andersen, R., and Rolandsen, C.M. 2009a. Elgens genetiske struktur i Norge. NINA Rapport 467. [English abstract.]
64. Solberg, E.J., Strand, O., Veiberg, V., Andersen, R., Heim, M., Rolandsen, C.M., Holmstrøm, F., and Solem, M.I. 2009b. Hjortevilt 2008 - A°rsrapport fra Overva°kingsprogrammet for hjortevilt. NINA Rapport 477. [English abstract.]
65. Statistics Norway. 2003. Hunting statistics 2002. Statistics Norway, Oslo and Kongsvinger.
66. Telfer, E.S. 1974. Logging as a factor in wildlife ecology in the boreal forest. For. Chron. 50: 186-190.
67. Thompson, I.D., and Stewart, R.W. 1998. Management of moose habitat. In Ecology and management of the North American moose. Edited by A.W. Franzmann and C.C. Schwartz. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C. pp. 377-401.
68. Tomter, S.M. 1999. Skog 2000. Statistikk over skogforhold og -ressurser I Norge. NIJOS Rapport 7/1999. [In Norwegian.]
69. van Beest, F.M., Mysterud, A., Loe, L.E., and Milner, J.M. 2010. Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore. J. Anim. Ecol. 79(4): 910-922. PMID:20443990.
70. Van Horne, B., Hanley, T.A., Cates, R.G., McKendrick, J.D., and Horner, J.D. 1988. Influence of seral stage and season on leaf chemistry of southeastern Alaska deer forage. Can. J. For. Res. 18(1): 90-99. doi:10.1139/x88-014.
71. Viherä-Aarnio, A., and Heikkilä, R. 2006. Effect of the latitude of seed origin on moose (Alces alces) browsing on silver birch (Betula pendula). For. Ecol. Manage. 229(1-3): 325-332. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.011.
72. Vivas, H.J., and Sæther, B.-E. 1987. Interactions between a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces, and it food resources: an experimental study of winter foraging behaviour in relation to browse availability. J. Anim. Ecol. 56(2): 509-520. doi:10.2307/5064.
73. Wam, H.K., and Hjeljord, O. 2010a. Summer diet from feces and field surveys: a comparative study. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 63(3): 387-395. doi:10.2111/REM-D-09-00039.1.
74. Wam, H.K., and Hjeljord, O. 2010b. Moose summer and winter diets along a large scale gradient of forage availability in southern Norway. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56(5): 745-755. doi:10.1007/s10344-010-0370-4.
75. Wam, H.K., and Hofstad, O. 2007. Taking timber browsing damage into account: a density dependant matrix model for the optimal harvest of moose in Scandinavia. Ecol. Econ. 62(1): 45-55. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.001.
76. Westoby, M. 1974. An analysis of diet selection by large generalist herbivores. Am. Nat. 108(961): 290-304. doi:10.1086/282908.
77. Wilson, J.B. 1988. A review of evidence on the control of shoot:root ratio in relation to models. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 61: 433-449.
78. Young, C. 1998. Defining the range: the development of carrying capacity in management practice. J. Hist. Biol. 31(1): 61-83. doi:10.1023/A:1004205522191.