A comparison of World Wide Web and paper-and-pencil mental health scales

Proceedings - 2010 IEEE 2nd Symposium on Web Society, SWS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 411-415

  Dai, Bibing ^a,b   Shi, Xianghui ^c   Li, Juan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c Equipment Support Department   (China)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Depression; Format; Paper and pencil; Scale; World Wide Web

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; DEPRESSION; FORMAT; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERNET BASED; MENTAL HEALTH; MISSING DATA; ONLINE FORMATS; ONLINE SURVEYS; SCALE;

DISEASES; HEALTH; INTERNET; SURVEYS;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 78650276483     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SWS.2010.5607415     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Thompson LF, Surface EA, Martin DL, Sanders MG. From paper to pixels: moving personnel surveys to the Web. Personnel Psychology, 2003, (56), pp. 197-227.
2. Couper MP. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2000, (64), pp. 464-494.
3. Fouladi RT, McCarthy CJ, Moller NP. Paper-and-pencil or online? Evaluating mode effects on measures of emotional functioning and attachment. Assessment, 2002, (9), pp. 204-215.
4. Stanton JM. An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet. Personnel Psychology, 1998, (51), 709-725.
5. Herrero J, Meneses J. Short Web-based versions of the perceived stress (PPS) and Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CESD) Scales: a comparison to pencil and paper responses among Internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 2006, (22), pp. 830-846.
6. Knapp H, Kirk SA. Using pencil and paper, Internet and touch-tone phones for self-administered surveys: does methodology matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 2003, (19), pp. 117-134.
7. Buchanan T, Ali T, Heffernan TM, et al. Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: The case of the prospective memory questionnaire. Behavior Research Methods, 2005, (37), pp. 148-154.
8. Wright DL, Aquilino WS, Supple AJ. A comparison of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaires in a survey on smoking, alcohol, and drug use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1998, (62), pp. 331-353.
9. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods, 1992, (21), 230-258.
10. Chuah SC, Drasgow F, Roberts BW. Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No. Journal of Research in Personality, 2006, (40), pp. 359-376.
11. Lonsdale C, Hodge K, Rose EA. Pixels vs. paper: comparing online and traditional survey methods in sport psychology. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 2006, (28), pp. 100-108.