Groundwater Banking in the Rio Grande Basin

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

Volumn 137, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 62-71

  Sandoval Solis, Samuel ^a   McKinney, Daene C ^a   Teasley, Rebecca L ^b   Patino Gomez, Carlos ^c  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^c INSTITUTO MEXICANO DE TECNOLOGÍA DEL AGUA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Conjunctive use; Groundwater banking; In lieu method; Rio Grande

Indexed keywords

BANKING IS; BASIN SIMULATION; CONJUNCTIVE USE; GROUNDWATER SOURCES; IN LIEU METHOD; MANAGEMENT POLICY; ME-XICO; PLANNING SYSTEMS; RIO GRANDE; TRANS-BOUNDARY; WATER ALLOCATIONS; WATER PLANNING; WATER USERS;

AQUIFERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; PLANNING; VOLCANIC ROCKS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

WATER CONSERVATION;

AQUIFER; BASIN MANAGEMENT; GROUNDWATER; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; WATER PLANNING; WATER SUPPLY;

RIO GRANDE BASIN [NORTH AMERICA];

EID: 78650256024     PISSN: 07339496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000091     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Buras N. Conjunctive operation of dams and aquifers. Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1963, 89(HY6):111-131. PACEAJ, 0097-417X.
2. Caballero J.O. Sociedad de Asociaciones de Usuarios: Unidad Conchos 2005, Comisión Nacional del Agua, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
3. Collado J. Criterios de distribución del agua en la Cuenca del Rio Bravo. Coordinación de tecnología de riego y drenaje 2002, Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua (IMTA), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
4. Distrito de Riego 026 Bajo Río San Juan. subdirección General de Infraestructura Hidroagrícola, Gerencia de Distritos Unidades de riego 2005, Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA), Gerencia Regional del Río Bravo, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
5. Diagnostico Hidrológico de la Cuenca del Rio Bravo. 2007, Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA), Secretaría del Medio Ambiente Recursos Naturales, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
6. Acuerdo por el que se da conocer el resultado de los estudios de disponibilidad media anual de las aguas superficiales en la cuenca del Rio Bravo 2008, Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA), Diario Oficial de la Federación, Distrito Federal, Mexico (Sept. 29, 2008).
7. Danner C.L. McKinney D.C. Teasley R.L. Sandoval-Solis S. Documentation and testing of the WEAP model for the Rio Grande basin. 2006, and CRWR Online Rep. No.06-8, Center for Research in Water Resources, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
8. Hashimoto T. Stedinger J.R. Loucks D.P. Reliability, resiliency and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour. Res. 1982, 18(1):14-20. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/WR018i001p00014, and.
9. Convention between the United States and Mexico. Equitable distribution of the waters of the Rio Grande 1906, International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC), IBWC, Washington, D.C.
10. Treaty between the United States and Mexico. Utilization of waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande 1944, International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC), IBWC, Washington, D.C.
11. Minute 308. United States allocation of Rio Grande waters during the last year of the current cycle 2002, International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC), IBWC, Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico.
12. Procedimiento de cálculo para la contabilidad de las aguas en el Rio Bravo. Criterio para calcular las pérdidas de las aportaciones de los afluentes mexicanos al Rio Bravo asociadas con las transferencias de agua de las presas internacionales 2005, International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC), Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico.
13. Rio Grande historical mean daily discharge data. Diversions from the Rio Grande United States 2008, International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC), IBWC United States Section, El Paso, Tex., 〈〉 (Dec. 31, ).
14. Recharge and recovery-Infrastructure development 2008, Kern Water Bank (KWB), Kern Water Bank Authority, Bakersfield, Calif., 〈〉 (Dec. 31, ).
15. Ley de Aguas Nacionales su Reglamento 2004, LAN, Comisión Nacional del Agua, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
16. Legates D.R. McCabe G.J. Evaluating the use of goodness-of-fit measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour. Res. 1999, 35(1):233-241. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/1998WR900018, and.
17. Loucks D.P. Quantifying trends in system sustainability. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1997, 42(4):513-530. HSJODN, 0262-6667, 10.1080/02626669709492051.
18. Loucks D.P. van Beek E. Water resources systems planning and management 2005, and UNESCO, Paris.
19. McMahon T.A. Adeloye A.J. Zhou S.-L. Understanding performance measures of reservoirs. J. Hydrol. 2006, 324:359-382. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.030.
20. McPhee J. Yeh W. Multiobjective optimization for sustainable groundwater management in semiarid regions. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2004, 130(6):490-497. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:6(490), and.
21. Nash J.E. Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models Part I-A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10:282-290. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, and.
22. Transboundary freshwater dispute database 2005, Oregon State University (OSU), Institute for Water and Watersheds, Corvallis, Ore.
23. Pulido-Velázquez M. Andreu J. Sahuquillo A. Economic optimization of conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater at the basin scale. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2006, 132(6):454-467. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:6(454), and.
24. Purkey D.R. Huber-Lee A. Yates D. Hanemann M. Herrod-Julius S. Integrating a climate change assessment tool into stakeholder-driven water management decision-making processes in California. Water Resour. Manage. 2006, 21(1):315-329. WRMAEJ, 0920-4741, 10.1007/s11269-006-9055-x, and.
25. Reining Y. Behrens J. Charles E. Using simulation to develop a conjunctive use policy: The Salt River project experience. Proc., 29th Annual Water Resources Planning and Management Conf. 1999, 102:177. and ASCE, Reston, Va.
26. Water availability modeling for the Río Grande basin: Naturalized streamflow data. 2003, R. J. Brandes Company, Final Rep., Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, Tex.
27. Registro Público de Derechos de Agua 2004, REPDA, Comisión Nacional del Agua, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
28. Estadísticas del Agua en México 2004, Secretaria de Medio Ambiente Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT), Comisión Nacional del Agua. Sistema Unificado de Información Básica del Agua, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
29. Decreto mediante el cual se otorgan facilidades administrativas para la regularización de usuarios de aguas nacionales que realicen actividades de carácter agrícola 2002, Secretaría del Medio Ambiente Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT), Diario Oficial de la Federación, Distrito Federal, Mexico (Feb. 4, 2008).
30. Semitropic groundwater banking program 2008, Semitropic Water Storage District (SWSD), Groundwater Banking, Wasco, Calif., 〈〉 (Dec. 31, ).
31. Seiber J. WEAP-Water evaluation and planning system 2006, Stockholm Environment Institute, Boston.
32. Tae-Woong K. Valdes J.B. Aparicio J. Frequency and spatial characteristics of drought in the Conchos River, Mexico. Water Int. 2002, 27(3):420-430. WAINEL, 0250-8060, and.
33. Teasley R.L. McKinney D.C. Modeling the forgotten river segment of the Rio Grande/Bravo basin. 2005, and CRWR Online Rep. No.05-12, Center for Research in Water Resources, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
34. Memo regarding channel losses for the Rio Grande basin 2003, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, Tex.
35. Rio Grande water master program 2005a, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, Tex.
36. Water availability models 2005b, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, Tex.
37. Texas administrative code, Title 30: Environmental quality 2006, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, Tex., Pt. 1, Chap. 303, Subchapter C.
38. Thomas G.A. Brown D.L. Pinhey N.A. Spaletta J.L. Kiel P. Designing successful groundwater banking programs in the central valley: Lessons from experience 2001, and National Heritage Institute, San Francisco.
39. Thomas G.A. McKinney D.C. A physical assessment of the opportunities for improved management of the water resources of the bi-national river basin. Rio Grande/Bravo Project Description 2006, and Natural Heritage Institute, San Francisco.
40. Vigerstol K. Drought management in Mexico's Rio Bravo basin. 2002, MS thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
41. Wagner A.I. Vaquero J.E. Modelo dinámico para el análisis de escenarios prospectivos en la Cuenca del Río Conchos 2002, and Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua (IMTA), Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico.
42. Willmott C.J. Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. J. Geophys. Res. 1985, 90:8995-9005. JGREA2, 0148-0227, 10.1029/JC090iC05p08995.
43. World's top 10 rivers at risk 2007, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), World Wildlife Fund International, Gland, Switzerland.
44. Yates D. Sieber J. Purkey D.R. Huber-Lee A. WEAP21-A demand, priority, and preference driven water planning model: Part 1. Model characteristics. Water Int. 2005, 30:487-500. WAINEL, 0250-8060, 10.1080/02508060508691893, and.