Empiricism, metaphysics, and voluntarism

Synthese

Volumn 178, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 19-26

  Steup, Matthias ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Doxastic attitudes; Empiricism; Metaphysics; Stance; Voluntarism

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650225636     PISSN: 00397857     EISSN: 15730964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-009-9518-8     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Alston W. (1989) Epistemic justification. Essays in the theory of knowledge. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
2. Feldman R. (2001) Voluntary belief and epistemic evaluation. In: Steup M. (eds) Knowledge, truth, and duty. Essays on epistemic justification, responsibility, and virtue. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 77-92.
3. Fischer J. M., Ravizza M. (1998) Responsibility and control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Goldman A. (1999) Internalism exposed. The Journal of Philosophy 96: 271-293.
5. Plantinga A. (1993) Warrant: The current debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Ryan S. (2003) Doxastic compatibilism and the ethics of belief. Philosophical Studies 114: 47-79.
7. Steup M. (2000) Doxastic voluntarism and epistemic deontology. Acta Analytica 15: 25-56.
8. Steup, M. (2007). Doxastic freedom. Synthese (forthcoming).
9. Teller P. (2004) Discussion-what is a stance?. Philosophical Studies 121: 159-170.
10. van Fraassen B. (2002) The empirical stance. Yale University Press, New Haven.
11. van Fraassen B. (2004) Précis of the empirical stance. Philosophical Studies 121: 127-132.
12. Williamson T. (2000) Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press, Oxford.