Universal and culture-specific effects of display-control compatibility

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 425-435

  Proctor, Robert W ^a   Vu, Kim Phuong L ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650210728     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0425     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bae, G. Y., Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Transfer of orthogonal stimulus-response mappings to an orthogonal Simon task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 746-765.
2. Bergum, B. O., & Bergum, J. E. (1981). Population stereotypes: An attempt to measure and define. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 662-665). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society
3. Brebner, J., & Sandow, B. (1976). The effect of scale side on population stereotype. Ergonomics, 19, 571-580.
4. Brebner, J., Shephard, M., & Cairney, P. (1972). Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 36, 1-15.
5. Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6. Chan, A. H. S., & Courtney, A. J. (2001). Color associations for Hong Kong Chinese. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28, 165-170.
7. Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 45-73.
8. Cho, Y. S., Proctor, R. W., & Yamaguchi, M. (2008). Influences of response position and hand posture on the orthogonal Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1020-1035.
9. Courtney, A. J. (1986). Chinese population stereotypes: Color associations. Human Factors, 28, 97-99.
10. Courtney, A. J. (1992). Control-display stereotypes for multicultural user systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 681-687.
11. De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., Vandorpe, S., & Custers, R. (2005). Further evidence for the role of mode-independent short-term associations in spatial Simon effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 659-666.
12. Fitts, P. M. (1951). Engineering psychology and equipment design. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1287-1340). New York, NY: Wiley.
13. Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954). S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492.
14. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
15. Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2008). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
16. Hancock, P., Flach, J., Caird, J., & Vicente, K. (Eds.). (1995). Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Heft, H. (2005). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Hoffmann, E. R. (1997). Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes: Linear displays and rotary controls. Ergonomics, 40, 199-222.
19. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
20. Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 102-110.
21. Ivanoff, J. (2003). On spatial response code activation in a Simon task. Acta Psychologica, 112, 157-179.
22. Jodo, E. (1987). The effect of stimulus luminance and spatial S-R compatibility on P300 latency. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 46, 51-61.
23. Kaneko, H., Tamura, H., Kawashima, T., & Suzuki, S. S. (2006). A choice reaction-time task in the rat: A new model using air-puff stimuli and lever-release responses. Behavioural Brain Research, 174, 151-159.
24. Kaplan, M. (Ed.). (2004). Cultural ergonomics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
25. Kitayama, S., & Cohen, D. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of cultural psychology. New York, NY: Guilford.
26. Koch, I., & Jolicoeur, P. (2007). Orthogonal cross-task compatibility: Abstract spatial coding in dual tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 45-50.
27. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
28. Kurosu, M., & Hashizume, A. (2009). Culture and communication behavior: A research based on the artifact development analysis. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human centered design, HCII 2009, LNCS 5619 (pp. 468-475). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
29. Loveless, N. E. (1962). Direction of motion stereotypes: A review. Ergonomics, 5, 357-383.
30. Mitchell, M. J. H., & Vince, M. A. (1951). The direction of movement of machine controls. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 24-35.
31. Mou, W., Zhang, K., & Guo, S. (1999). Effects of stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility and response complexity on response selection and response programming process. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 31, 411-417.
32. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 333-343.
34. Nishimura, A., & Yokosawa, K. (2006). Orthogonal stimulus- response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task-irrelevant. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1021-1032.
35. Nishimura, A., & Yokosawa, K. (2007). Preparation for horizontal or vertical dimensions affects the right-left prevalence effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1242-1252.
36. Notebaert, W., De Moor, W., Gevers, W., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007). New visuo-spatial associations by training verbospatial mappings in the first language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1183-1188.
37. Parasuraman, R., & Rizzo, M. (Eds.). (2007). Neuroergonomics: The brain at work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38. Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416-442.
39. Proctor, R. W., Marble, J., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2000). Mixing incompatibly mapped location-relevant trials with locationirrelevant trials: Effects of stimulus mode on performance. Psychological Research, 64, 11-24.
40. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2002). Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: Influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects. Memory & Cognition, 30, 281-293.
41. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and application. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
42. Proctor, R. W., Vu, K.-P. L., & Pick, D. F. (2005). Aging and response selection in spatial choice tasks. Human Factors, 47, 250-270.
43. Riehle, A., Kornblum, S., & Requin, J. (1997). Neuronal correlates of sensorimotor association in stimulus-response compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1708-1726.
44. Rubichi, S., Vu, K.-P. L., Nicoletti, R., & Proctor, R. W. (2006). Spatial coding in two dimensions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 201-216.
45. Shinar, D., Dewar, R. E., Summala, H., & Zakowska, L. (2003). Traffic sign symbol comprehension: A crosscultural study. Ergonomics, 46, 1549-1565.
46. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.
47. Simpson, G. C., & Chan, W. L. (1988). The derivation of population stereotypes for mining machines and some reservations on the general applicability of published stereotypes. Ergonomics, 31, 327-335.
48. Smith, S. L. (1981). Exploring compatibility with words and pictures. Human Factors, 23, 305-315.
49. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of LTM links and STM links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648-670.
50. Urcuioli, P. J., Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2005). A Simon effect in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 93-107.
51. Vu, K.-P. L., Ngo, T. K., Minakata, K., & Proctor, R. W. (in press). Shared spatial representations for physical locations and location words in bilinguals' primary language. Memory & Cognition, 38, 713-722.
52. Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 813-828.
53. Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2004). Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: Elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 539-556.
54. Weeks, D. J., Proctor, R. W., & Beyak, B. (1995). Stimulus- response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: Evidence for spatial coding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 367-383.
55. Wong, C. K., & Lyman, J. (1988). American and Japanese control-display stereotypes: Possible implications for design of space station systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 30-34). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.