Is the birthweight of singletons born after IVF reduced by ovarian stimulation or by IVF laboratory procedures?

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 245-251

  Pelinck, M J ^a   Hadders Algra, M ^a   Haadsma, M L ^a   Nijhuis, W L ^a   Kiewiet, S M ^a   Hoek, A ^a   Heineman, M J ^a,b   Middelburg, K J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

IVF; natural cycle; ovarian stimulation; perinatal outcome; pregnancy outcome; single embryo transfer

Indexed keywords

CETRORELIX; CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; LEUPRORELIN; PROGESTERONE; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN; TRIPTORELIN;

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; CONCEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; NEWBORN; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANT WOMAN;

BIRTH WEIGHT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY;

EID: 78650185369     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.04.024     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Y. Abramov, U. Elchalal, and J.G. Schenker Obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized pregnancies complicated by severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a multicenter study Fertil. Steril. 70 1998 1070 1076
2. D.J. Barker Fetal programming of coronary heart disease Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 13 2002 364 368
3. M. Ceelen, M.M. van Weissenbruch, and J.P. Vermeiden Cardiometabolic differences in children born after in vitro fertilization: follow-up study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 93 2008 1682 1688
4. K. Chung, C. Coutifaris, and R. Chalian Factors influencing adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies achieved through use of in vitro fertilization Fertil. Steril. 86 2006 1634 1641
5. H.A. De Boo, and J.E. Harding The developmental origins of adult disease (Barker) hypothesis Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 46 2006 4 14
6. P. Devroey, C. Bourgain, and N.S. Macklon Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and endometrial receptivity Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 15 2004 84 90
7. R.P. Dickey, S.N. Taylor, and P.Y. Lu Spontaneous reduction of multiple pregnancy: incidence and effect on outcome Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 186 2002 77 83
8. R.G. Edwards Human implantation: the last barrier in assisted reproduction technologies? Reprod. Biomed. Online 13 2006 887 904
9. J.G. Eriksson, T. Forsen, and J. Tuomilehto Effects of size at birth and childhood growth on the insulin resistance syndrome in elderly individuals Diabetologia 45 2002 342 348
10. P.D. Gluckman, and M.A. Hanson The developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 15 2004 183 187
11. G. Griesinger, E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Diedrich, and M. Ludwig Ovarian stimulation for IVF has no quantitative association with birthweight: a registry study Hum. Reprod. 23 2008 2549 2554
12. F.M. Helmerhorst, D.A. Perquin, and D. Donker Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies Br. Med. J. 328 2004 261 265
13. R.A. Jackson, K.A. Gibson, and Y.W. Wu Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis Obstet. Gynecol. 103 2004 551 563
14. S.K. Kalra, and T.A. Molinaro The association of in vitro fertilization and perinatal morbidity Semin. Reprod. Med. 26 2008 423 435
15. I.Y. Khan, L. Lakasing, and L. Poston Fetal programming for adult disease: where next? J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 13 2003 292 299
16. N.S. Macklon, and B.C. Fauser Impact of ovarian hyperstimulation on the luteal phase J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 55 2000 101 108
17. I.C. McMillen, and J.S. Robinson Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming Physiol. Rev. 85 2005 571 633
18. M.F. Mitwally, S.S. Abdel-Razeq, and M. Suilivan Estradiol production during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation correlates with the birth weight in pregnancies achieved after in vitro fertilization Fertil. Steril. 82 S2 2004 50 51
19. G. Nargund, B.C. Fauser, N.S. Macklon for the Rotterdam ISMAAR Consensus Group on Terminology for Ovarian Stimulation for IVF The ISMAAR proposal on terminology for ovarian stimulation for IVF Hum. Reprod. 22 2007 2801 2804
20. P. Paiva, L.A. Salamonsen, and U. Manuelpillai Interleukin-11 promotes migration, but not proliferation, of human trophoblast cells, implying a role in placentation Endocrinology 148 2007 5566 5572
21. Z. Pandian, S. Bhattacharya, and A. Templeton Review of unexplained infertility and obstetric outcome: a 10 year review Hum. Reprod. 16 2001 2593 2597
22. M.J. Pelinck, N.E. Vogel, and A. Hoek Minimal stimulation IVF with late follicular phase administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix and concomitant substitution with recombinant FSH: a pilot study Hum. Reprod. 20 2005 642 648
23. M.J. Pelinck, H.H. Keizer, and A. Hoek Perinatal outcome in singletons after modified natural cycle IVF and standard IVF with ovarian stimulation Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 148 2010 56 61
24. A. Pinborg, O. Lidegaard, and N. la Cour Freiesleben Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies Hum. Reprod. 20 2005 2821 2829
25. P. Poikkeus, and A. Tiitinen Does single embryo transfer improve the obstetric and neonatal outcome of singleton pregnancy? Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 87 2008 888 892
26. L.B. Romundstad, P.R. Romundstad, and A. Sunde Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study Lancet 372 2008 737 743
27. L.A. Schieve, C. Ferre, and H.B. Peterson Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States Obstet. Gynecol. 103 2004 1144 1153 (Pubitemid 40458943)
28. A.G. Sutcliffe, and M. Ludwig Outcome of assisted reproduction Lancet 370 2007 351 359
29. F. Thomson, S. Shanbhag, and A. Templeton Obstetric outcome in women with subfertility Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 112 2005 632 637