Public sector efficiency: Leveling the playing field between OECD countries

Public Choice

Volumn 146, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 163-183

  Adam, Antonis ^a   Delis, Manthos ^a   Kammas, Pantelis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

C14; H11; H50; Political determinants of efficiency; Public sector efficiency; Stochastic DEA

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650181774     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-009-9588-7     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adam, A., Delis, M., & Kammas, P. (2008). Fiscal decentralization and public sector efficiency: evidence from OECD countries. CESifo, Working Paper no. 2364, August.
2. Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2005). Public sector efficiency: an international comparison. Public Choice, 123, 321-347.
3. Alesina, A., & Drazen, A. (1991). Why are stabilizations delayed? American Economic Review, 81, 1170-1188.
4. Angelopoulos, K., Philippopoulos, A., & Tsionas, E. (2008). Does public sector efficiency matter? Revisiting the relation between fiscal size and economic growth in a world sample. Public Choice, 137, 245-278.
5. Angelopoulos, K., & Philippopoulos, A. (2005). The role of government in anti-social redistributive activities. CESifo, Working Paper no. 1427, March.
6. Ashworth, J., Geys, B., Heyndels, B., & Wille, F. (2006). Political competition and local government performance: evidence from Flemish municipalities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Turku.
7. Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2007). On the determinants of local government performance: a two-stage nonparametric approach. European Economic Review, 51, 425-451.
8. Barankay, I., & Lockwood, B. (2007). Decentralization and the productive efficiency of government: evidence from Swiss cantons. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1197-1218.
9. Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardsick competition. American Economic Review, 85, 25-45.
10. Borge, L. E., Falch, T., & Tovmo, P. (2008). Public sector efficiency: the roles of political and budgetary institutions, fiscal capacity, and democratic participation. Public Choice, 136, 475-495.
11. Bradford, D., Malt, R., & Oates, W. (1969). The rising cost of local public services, some evidence and reflections. National Tax Journal, 22, 185-202.
12. Bravo-Ureta, B. E., Solfs, D., Lopez, V. H. M., Maripani, J. F., Thiam, A., & Rivas, T. (2007). Technical efficiency in farming-a meta-regression analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 27, 37-72.
13. Breton, A., & Wintrobe, A. (1975). The equilibrium size of a budget maximizing bureau. Journal of Political Economy, 83, 195-207.
14. Castles, F., & Mair, P. (1984). Left-right political scales: some expert judgements. European Journal of Political Research, 12, 73-88.
15. Coelli, T., Rao, D. S. P., O'Donnell, C. C., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York: Springer.
16. Duncombe, W., Miner, J., & Ruggiero, J. (1997). Empirical evaluation of bureaucratic models of inefficiency. Public Choice, 93, 1-18.
17. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
18. Falch, T. (2001). Collective bargaining in the public sector and the role of budget determination. European Journal of Political Economy, 17, 75-99.
19. Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., Schmidt, S. S., & Yaisawarng, S. (2002). Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 157-174.
20. Geys, B. (2006). Looking across borders: a test of spatial interdependence using local government efficiency ratings. Journal of Urban Economics, 60, 443-462.
21. Glass, J. C., McCallion, G., McKillop, D. G., & Stringer, K. (2006). A 'technically level playing-field' profit efficiency analysis of enforced competition between publicly funded institutions. European Economic Review, 50, 1601-1626.
22. Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (2001). Special Interest politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
23. Gupta, S., & Verhoeven, M. (2001). The efficiency of government expenditure, experiences from Africa. Journal of Policy Modelling, 23, 433-467.
24. Hanushek, E. A., & Kimko, D. D. (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90, 1184-1208.
25. Hayes, K. J., Razzolini, L., & Ross, L. (1998). Bureaucratic choice and nonoptimal provision of public goods: theory and evidence. Public Choice, 94, 1-20.
26. Hindriks, J., & Lockwood, B. (2005). Decentralization and electoral accountability: incentives, separation, and voter welfare. Warwick, Working Papers in Economics, no. 717.
27. Hoff, A. (2007). Second stage DEA: comparison of approaches for modeling the DEA score. European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 425-435.
28. IMF (2002). Government Finance Statistics, CD-ROM. Washington DC, USA.
29. Institute of Democracy and Electoral Assistance (2009). IDEA Voter Turnout dataset.
30. International Country Risk Guide (2006). IRIS Center, University of Maryland.
31. Kumbhakar, S., & Tsionas, E. (2005). The joint measurement of technical and allocative inefficiencies: an application of Bayesian inference in nonlinear random-effects models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 736-747.
32. Kumbhakar, S., Park, B., Simar, L., & Tsionas, E. (2007). Nonparametric stochastic frontiers: a local maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Econometrics, 137, 1-27.
33. Mierau, J., Jong-A-Pin, R., & de Haan, J. (2007). Do political variables affect fiscal policy adjustment decisions? New empirical evidence. Public Choice, 133, 297-319.
34. Migué, J., & Bélanger, G. (1974). Toward a general theory of managerial discretion. Public Choice, 17, 27-43.
35. Moene, K. O. (1986). Types of bureaucratic interaction. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 333-345.
36. Niskanen, W. A. (1975). Bureaucrats and politicians. The Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 617-643.
37. OECD (2000). Social expenditure database. Paris.
38. OECD (2005). Telecommunications database. Paris.
39. OECD (2006). Health data. Paris.
40. Peltzman, S. (1973). The Effect of government subsidies-in-kind on private expenditures: the case of higher education. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 1-27.
41. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2003). The economic effects of constitutions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
42. Quinn, D. (1997). The correlates of change in international financial regulation. American Political Science Review, 91, 531-551.
43. Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. (1989). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies. European Economic Review, 35, 903-933.
44. Seabright, P. (1996). Accountability and decentralization in government: an incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40, 61-91.
45. Sijpe, N., & Rayp, G. (2007). Measuring and explaining government efficiency in developing countries. Journal of Development Studies, 43, 360-381.
46. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136, 31-64.
47. Spolaore, E. (1993). Policy making systems and economic efficiency, coalition governments vs majority government. Harvard University. Unpublished paper.
48. Strøm, B. (1995). Envy, fairness and political influence in local government wage determination: evidence from Norway. Economica, 62, 382-409.
49. Tanzi, V., & Schuknecht, L. (1998). Can small governments secure economic and social well-being. In Grubel, H. (Ed.), How to spend the fiscal dividend: what is the optimal size of government? Vancouver: Fraser Institute.
50. Tanzi, V., & Schuknecht, L. (2000). Public spending in the 20th century: global perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Tavares, J. (2004). Does right or left matter? Cabinets, credibility and fiscal adjustments. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2447-2468.
52. Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25, 289-325.
53. United Nations (2000). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, Statistical Papers, Series M, No. 84, New York.
54. Williamson, O. (1964). The economics of discretionary behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
55. Wintrobe, R. (1997). Modern bureaucratic theory. In Mueller, D. (Ed.), Perspectives in public choice: a handbook. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
57. World Bank (2004). World Bank development indicators, CD-ROM. Washington DC, USA.
58. World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University (UNUWIDER) (2007). World income inequality database.
59. Wyckoff, G. (1990). Bureaucracy, inefficiency, and time. Public Choice, 67, 169-179.
60. Zhu, J. (2003). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking. New York: Springer.