An investigation into differences between the structure of temperament and the structure of personality

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 467-480

  Trofimova, Irina ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650181707     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0467     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allport, G. W. (1927). Concepts of trait and personality. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 284-293.
2. Bishop, D., & Hertenstein, M. (2004). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Structure of Temperament Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 1019-1029.
3. Bishop, D., Jacks, H., & Tandy, S. B. (1993). Structure of Temperament Questionnaire (STQ): Results from a US sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 485-487.
4. Brebner, J., & Stough, C. (1993). The relationship between the Structure of Temperament and Extraversion and Neuroticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 623-626.
5. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO Pl-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.
6. Dumenci, L. (1995). The relation between the Structure of Temperament Questionnaire and other personality domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 850-857.
7. Dumenci, L. (1996). Factorial validity of scores on the Structure of Temperament Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 487-493.
8. Egorova, M., & Piankova, S. (1992). Poisk ochucheniy i osobennosti lichnostnoy sferi [Sensation seeking and particularities of personality]. In Aktual'niye problemi psichologicheskoy slujbi [Modern problems of psychological services] (Vol. 2, pp. 140-146). Odessa, Ukraine: Odessa University.
9. Fahrenberg, J. (1991). Differential psychophysiology and the diagnosis of temperament. In J. Strelau & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement (pp. 317-333). London, England: Plenum.
10. Franz, E. A., Ivry, R. B., & Helmuth, L. L. (1996). Reduced timing variability in patients with unilateral cerebellar lesions during bimanual movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 107-118.
11. Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & Smith, A. (1992). Evidence of common timing processes in the control of manual, orofacial, and speech movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 281-287.
12. Gange, J. J., Geen, R. G., & Harkins, S. G. (2007). Autonomic differences between extraverts and introverts during vigilance. Psychophysiology, 16(4), 392-397.
13. Gray, J. A (1964). Pavlov's typology: Recent theoretical and experimental developments from the laboratory of B. M. Teplov. New York, NY: Macmillan.
14. Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15. Gray, J. A. (2004). Consciousness: Creeping up on the hard problem. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16. Harrington, D. L., Haaland, K. Y., & Hermanowicz, N. (1998). Temporal processing in the basal ganglia. Neuropsychology, 12, 3-12.
17. Hebb, D. O. (1980). Essay on mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Heymans, G. (1929). Inleiding tot de speciale psychologie [Introduction to differential psychology]. Haarlem, the Netherlands: De Erven F. Bohn.
19. Ivry, R., & Keele, S. (1989). Timing functions of the cerebellum. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 136-152.
20. Kant, I. (1798). Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view (Trans. M. Gregor). The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. (Original work published 1798)
21. Kudryashev, A. F. (Ed.). (1992). Luchshie psichologicheskiye testi dlya profotbora i proforientacii [Best psychological tests for vocational assessment and orientation]. Petrozavodsk, Russia: Petrozavodsk University.
22. Labouvie-Vief, G., Diehl, M., Tarnowski, A., & Shen, J. (2000). Age differences in adult personality: Findings from the United States and China. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(1), 4-17.
23. Lamiell, J. T. (2003). Beyond individual and group differences: Human individuality, scientific psychology, and William Stern's critical personalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York, NY: Basic Books.
25. Mortimer, J. T., Finch, M. D., & Kumka, D. (1982). Persistence and change in development: The multidimensional self-concept. Life-Span Development and Behavior, 4, 263-313.
26. Nebylitsyn, V. D. (1972). Fundamental properties of the human nervous system. New York, NY: Plenum.
27. Nebylitsyn, V. D. (1976). Psycho-physiologicheskie issledovania individual'niy raslichiy [Psycho-physiological studies of individual differences]. Collection of papers in memory of V. Nebylitsyn. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.
28. O'Boyle, D. J. (1997). On the human neuropsychology of timing of simple, repetitive movements. In C. M. Bradshaw & E. Szabadi (Eds.), Time and behaviour: Psychological and neuro-behavioural analyses (pp. 459-515). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
29. Pavlov, I. P. (1941). Lectures on conditioned reflexes, v. II: Types of the higher nervous activity, their interdependence with neuroses and psychoses and the physiological mechanism of neurotic and psychotic symptoms. New York, NY: International Publishers.
30. Rao, S. M., Harrington, D. L., Haaland, K. Y., Bobholz, J. A., Cox, R. W., & Binder, J. R. (1997). Distributed neural systems underlying the timing of movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 5528-5535.
31. Revelle, W. R. (1973). Introversion/extraversion, skin conductance and performance under stress. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 487B.
32. Revelle, W., Humphreys, M. S., Simon, L., & Gilliland, K. (1980). The interactive effect of personality, time of day, and caffeine: A test of the arousal model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 1-31.
33. Rocklin, T., & Revelle, W. (1981). The measurement of extraversion: A comparison of the Eysenck Personality Inventory and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 279-284.
34. Rogers, C. R. (1975). Empathic: An unappreciated way of being. Counselling Psychologist, 5(2), 2-10.
35. Ruch, W., Angleitner, A., & Strelau, J. (1991). The Strelau Temperament Inventory-Revised (STI-R): Validity studies. European Journal of Personality, 5, 287-308.
36. Rusalov, V. M. (1979). Biologicheskiye osnovi individual'nopsichologicheskih razlichiy [Biological basis of individual psychological differences]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.
37. Rusalov, V. M. (1989). Object-related and communicative aspects of human temperament: A new questionnaire of the structure of temperament. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 817-827.
38. Rusalov, V. M. (1997). Oprosnik formal'no-dynamicheskih svoystv individual'nosti: Rukovodstvo [Questionnaire of formal-dynamical properties of individuality: Manual]. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, IPAN Press.
39. Rusalov, V. M. (2004). Formal-dynamical properties of individual (temperament). Short theory and methods of measurement for various age groups. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, IPAN.
40. Rusalov, V. M., & Trofimova, I. N. (2007). Structure of temperament and its measurement. Toronto, Canada: Psychological Services Press.
41. Stelmack, R. M., & Michaud-Achorn, A. (1985). Extraversion, attention, and habituation of the auditory evoked response. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 416-428.
42. Stough, C., Brebner, J., & Cooper, C. (1991). The Rusalov Structure of Temperament Questionnaire (STQ): Results from an Australian sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1355-1357.
43. Strelau, J. (1999). The Pavlovian Temperament Survey (PTS): An international handbook. Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
44. Teplov, B. M., & Nebylitsyn, V. D. (1963). Experimental study of properties of the nervous system in man. Journal of Highest Nervous Activity, 13, 789-797.
45. Trofimova, I. (1999). How people of different age, sex and temperament estimate the world. Psychological Reports, 85(2), 533-552.
46. Trofimova, I. (2009a). Exploration of the benefits of an activity-specific test of temperament. Psychological Reports, 105, 643-658.
47. Trofimova, I. (2009b). Sex differences in physical and verbal-social capacities might be age-related. Manuscript submitted for publication.
48. Trofimova, I. (2010a). Exploration of the activity-specific model of temperament in four cultures. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10(1), 79-95.
49. Trofimova, I. (2010b). Questioning the "general arousal" models. Open Behavioral Science and Psychology, 4, 1-8.
50. Trofimova, I., & Sulis, W. (2010). The lability of behavior as a marker of comorbid depression and anxiety. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 3, 190-199.
51. Watkins, D., Mortazavi, S., & Trofimova, I. (2000). Independent and interdependent conceptions of self: An investigation of age, gender and culture differences in importance and satisfaction ratings. Cross Cultural Research, 34(2), 113-134.
52. Yang, J., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1998). Adult age differences in personality traits in the United States and the People's Republic of China. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53(6), 375-383.
53. Zonderman, A. B., Siegler, I. C., Barefoot, J. C., Williams, R. B., & Costa, P. T. (1993). Age and gender differences in the content scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Experimental Aging Research, 19(3), 241-257.
54. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioural expressions and biosocial bases of Sensation Seeking. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.