Reconstructing boundaries and reason in the climate debate

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 565-569

  Berkhout, Frans ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Climate change; Intergovernmental panel on climate change; Science and policy

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 78650174670     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Calmthout, M., 2010. Smeltende geloofwaardigheid. De Volkskrant, 8.3.2010 (accessed at , on 9.7.2010). http://www.volkskrant.nl/wetenschap/article1346426.ece/Smeltende_geloofwaardigheid.
2. DeMaria A.N. Peer review: the weakest link. Journal of American College of Cardiology 2010, 55:1161-1162.
3. Dryzek J. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
4. Gaventa J. Toward a knowledge democracy: viewpoints on participatory research in North America. Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action-Research 1991, 121-133. Apex Press, New York. O. Fals-Borda, M.A. Rahman (Eds.).
5. Gieryn T.F., Bevins G.M., Zehr S.C. Professionalisation of American scientists: public science in the creation/evolution trials. American Sociological Review 1985, 50:392-409.
6. Habermas J. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Hessels L.K., van Lente H., Smits R. In search of relevance: the changing contract between science and society. Science and Public Policy 2009, 36(5):387-401.
8. Hoppe R. Policy analysis, science and politics: from 'speaking truth to power' to 'making sense together'. Science and Public Policy 1999, 26(3):201-210.
9. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, 2010. The disclosure of climate data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. HC 387-I. 31.3.2010.
10. Hulme M. Why we Disagree about Climate Change? 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. InterAcademy Council, 2010. Review of the IPCC; an evaluation of the procedures and process of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (accessed at , 9.7.2010). http://reviewipcc.interacademycouncil.net/index.html.
12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 (3 vols.) 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. IPCC Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report 2008, IPCC, Geneva.
14. Jasanoff S.S. Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science 1987, 17(2):195-230.
15. Jefferson T., Alderson P., Wager E., Davidoff F. The effects of editorial peer review. Journal of American Medical Association 2002, 287:2784-2786.
16. Oreskes N., Conway E.M. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming 2010, Bloomsbury, New York.
17. Oreskes N., Conway E.M. Defeating the merchants of doubt. Nature 2010, 465:686-687.
18. Oxburgh, R., 2010 Report of the International Panel set up by the University of East Anglia to examine research of the Climatic Research Unit, 12.4.2010 (accessed at , 9.7.2010). http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/CRUstatements.
19. Pearce F. Commentary. The Guardian 2010, 7.
20. Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving (PBL, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency), 2010. Assessing an IPCC assessment: an analysis of statements on projected regional impacts in the 2007 report. PBL Pub. No: 500216002, Bilthoven, NL.
21. Russell, M., 2010. The Independent Climate Change E-mails Review (accessed at , 9.7.2010). http://www.cce-review.org/.
22. van der Kerkhof M. Debating Climate Change: A Study of Stakeholder Participation in an Integrated Assessment of Long-term Climate Policy in The Netherlands 2004, Lemma Publishers, Utrecht.