Reaching students where they go: Embedding library resources in course content

Science and Technology Libraries

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 289-297

  Barr, Dorothy ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

academic libraries; college students; course management systems; library 2.0; library resources

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS; ACADEMIC LIBRARIES; COLLEGE STUDENTS; COURSE CONTENTS; COURSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; LIBRARY RESOURCES; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; ONLINE VERSIONS; PODCASTS; WEB 2.0;

CURRICULA; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; LIBRARIES; MANAGEMENT; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 78650156828     PISSN: 0194262X     EISSN: 15411109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0194262X.2010.523305     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anonymous. 2001. Course management software: Where is the library? Online Libraries & Microcomputers 19(10):1-2.
2. Becker, B. W. 2010. Embedded librarianship: A point-of-need service. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 29(3):237-40.
3. Bell, S. J., and J. D. Shank. 2004. Linking the library to courseware: A strategic alliance to improve learning outcomes. Library Issues 25(2):1-4.
4. Black, E. L., and B. Blankenship. 2010. Linking students to library resources through the learning management system. Journal of Library Administration 50(5):458-67.
5. Collard, S., and N. Tempelman-Kluit. 2006. The other way in: Goal-based library content through CMS. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 11(4):55-68.
6. Corrado, E. M. 2008. Delicious subject guides: Maintaining subject guides using a social bookmarking site. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research 3(2):1-19.
7. Courtois, M. P., M. E. Higgins, and A. Kapur. 2005. Was this guide helpful? Users' perceptions of subject guides. Reference Services Review 33(2):188-96.
8. Daly, E. 2010. Embedding library resources into learning management systems: A way to reach Duke undergrads at their points of need. College & Research Libraries News 71(4):208-12.
9. Dempsey, L. 2003. The recombinant library: Portals and people. Journal of Library Administration 39(4):103-36.
10. Dupuis, J., P. Ryan, and M. Steeves. 2004. Creating dynamic subject guides. New Review of Information Networking 10(2):271-77.
11. Dygert, C., and P. Moeller. 2007. Linking the library and campus course management system. Serials Librarian 52(3):305-309.
12. Farkas, M. 2007. Subject guide 2.0. American Libraries 38(5):33.
13. Gibbons, S. 2005a. Integration of libraries and course-management systems. Library Technology Reports 41(3):12-20.
14. Gibbons, S. 2005b. Strategies for the library: CMS integration barriers. Library Technology Reports 41(3):24-32.
15. Hightower, B., C. Rawl, and M. Schutt. 2007. Collaborations for delivering the library to students through WebCT. Reference Services Review 35(4):541-51.
16. Jackson, R., and L. J. Pellack. 2004. Internet subject guides in academic libraries. Reference & User Services Quarterly 43(4):319-27.
17. Lenholt, R., B. Costello, and J. Stryker. 2003. Utilizing Blackboard to provide library instruction: Uploading MS word handouts with links to course specific resources. Reference Services Review 31(3):211-18.
18. Love, M., and S. Norwood. 2007. Finding our way as "embedded librarians." College & Undergraduate Libraries 14(4):87-93.
19. Lovett, D. G. 2004. Library involvement in the implementation of a course management system. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 23(1):1-11.
20. Mairn, C. 2010. Enhancing learning while creating a library presence in course management systems. Journal of Web Librarianship 4(1):55-61.
21. Morris, S. E., and M. Grimes. 1999. A great deal of time and effort: An overview of creating and maintaining internet-based subject guides. Library Computing: Internet & Software Applications for Information Professionals 18(3):213.
22. Piña, A. A. 2007. Course management systems: Overview and implications for libraries. Library Hi Tech News 24(5):7-9.
23. Reeb, B., and S. Gibbons. 2004. Students, librarians, and subject guides: Improving a poor rate of return. Portal: Libraries & the Academy 4(1):123-30.
24. Shank, J. D., and N. H. Dewald. 2003. Establishing our presence in courseware: Adding library services to the virtual classroom. Information Technology and Libraries 22(1):38-44.
25. Solis, J., and E. M. Hampton. 2009. Promoting a comprehensive view of library resources in a course management system. New Library World 110(1):81-91.
26. Staley, S. M. 2007. Academic subject guides: A case study of use at San José State University. College & Research Libraries 68(2):119-39.
27. Tchangalova, N., and A. Feigley. 2008. Subject guides: Putting a new spin on an old concept. Electronic Journal of Academic & Special Librarianship 9(3):1.
28. Wales, T. 2005. Library subject guides: A content management case study at the open university, UK. Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems 39(2):112-21.
29. York, A. C., and J. M. Vance. 2009. Taking library instruction into the online classroom: Best practices for embedded librarians. Journal of Library Administration 49(1):197-209.