Seeing the other side: Reducing political partisanship via self-affirmation in the 2008 presidential election

Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 276-292

  Binning, Kevin R ^a   Sherman, David K ^b   Cohen, Geoffrey L ^a   Heitland, Kirsten ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTION; ELECTORAL SYSTEM; PARTY POLITICS; VIEW; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 78650138728     PISSN: 15297489     EISSN: 15302415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01210.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Babbitt, E. (1994). Jimmy Carter: The power of moral suasion in international mediation. In D. Kolb & Associates (Eds.), When talk works (pp. 375-393). San Francisco Jossey-Bass.
2. Binning, K. R. (2007). "It's us against the world": How distrust in Americans versus people-in general shapes support for competitive foreign policies. Political Psychology, 28, 777-799.
3. Cohen, G. L. (in press). Identity, belief, and bias. Chapter to appear in J. Hanson (Ed.), Ideology, psychology, and law.
4. Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808-822.
5. Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307-1310.
6. Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., McGoey, M., Hsu, A., & Ross, L. (2007). Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 415-430.
7. Correll, J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). An affirmed self and an open mind: Self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 350-356.
8. Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure "change"- or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68-80.
9. Dur, R. A. J. (2001). Why do policy makers stick to inefficient decisions? Public Choice, 107, 221-234.
10. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.
11. Fernandez, R., & Rodrik, D. (1991). Resistance to reform: Status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. The American Economic Review, 81, 1146-1155.
12. Harnden, T. (2008). John McCain poised to become White House front-runner. (Retrieved March 19, 2010 from).
13. Harris, P. R., & Epton, T. (2009). The impact of self-affirmation on health cognition, health behaviour and other health-related responses: A narrative review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 962-978.
14. Harris, P. R., & Napper, L. (2005). Self-affirmation and the biased processing of threatening health-risk information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1250-1263.
15. Kelman, H. (2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 1-26.
16. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103, 263-268.
17. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
18. Landau, M. J., & Greenberg, J. (2006). Play it safe or go for the gold? A terror management perspective on self-enhancement and protection motives in risky decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1633-1645.
19. Lowery, B. S., Unzueta, M. M., Knowles, E. D., & Goff, P. A. (2006). Concern for the ingroup and opposition to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 961-974.
20. Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. P. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
21. McQueen, A., & Klein, W. M. P. (2006). Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review. Self and Identity, 5, 289-354.
22. Miller, D. T., Taylor, B., & Buck, M. L. (1991). Gender gaps: Who needs to be explained Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 5-12.
23. Reeson, G. C. (2008). The Obama referendum. (Retrieved March19, 2010 from).
24. Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1995). Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 255-304). San Diego, CA Academic Press.
25. Sears, D. O., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T., & Allen, H. M., Jr. (1980). Self-interest versus symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting. American Political Science Review, 74, 670-684.
26. Seyle, D. C., & Newman, M. L. (2006). A house divided? The psychology of red and blue America. American Psychologist, 61, 571-580.
27. Schmeichel, B. J., & Martens, A. (2005). Self-affirmation and mortality salience: Affirming values reduces worldview defense and death-thought accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 658-667.
28. Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2002). Accepting threatening information: Self-affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 119-123.
29. Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 183-242). San Diego, CA Academic Press.
30. Sherman, D. K., & Hartson, K. (in press). Reconciling self-defense with self-criticism: Self-affirmation theory. Chapter to appear in M. Alicke & C. Sedikides (Eds.), The handbook of self-enhancement and self protection. Guilford Press.
31. Sherman, D. K., Hogg, M. A., & Maitner, A. T. (2009). Perceived polarization: Reconciling ingroup and intergroup perceptions under uncertainty. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 95-109.
32. Sherman, D. K., & Kim, H. S. (2005). Is there an "I" in "team"? The role of the self in group-serving judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 108-120.
33. Sherman, D. K., Kinias, Z., Major, B., Kim, H. S., & Prenovost, M. (2007). The group as a resource: Reducing biased attributions for group success and failure via group affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1100-1112.
34. Sivanathan, N., Molden, D. C., Galinsky, A. D., & Ku, G. (2008). The promise and peril of self-affirmation in de-escalation of commitment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 1-14.
35. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
36. Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). San Diego, CA Academic Press.
37. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769.
38. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL Nelson Hall.