Short-term exposure to one dialect affects processing of another

Language and Speech

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 447-471

  Hay, Jen ^a   Drager, Katie ^b   Warren, Paul ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

accommodation; exemplar theory; merger; priming; speech perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650117264     PISSN: 00238309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0023830910372489     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bauer, L. (1986). Notes on New Zealand English phonetics and phonology. English Worldwide, 7, 225-258.
2. Bauer, L., & Warren, P. (2004). New Zealand English: Phonology. In B. Kortmann, E. W. Schneider, K. Burridge, R. Mesthrie, & C. Upton (Eds.), A handbook of varieties of English: A multimedia reference tool (Vol. 1, pp.580-602). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145-204.
4. Coupland, N. (1984). Accommodation at work. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 49-70.
5. Drager, K. (2006). From Bad to Bed: The relationship between perceived age and vowel perception in New Zealand English. Te Reo, 48, 55-68.
6. Drager, K. (in press). Speaker age and vowel perception. Language and Speech.
7. Foulkes, P., & Docherty, G.J. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 409-438.
8. Gordon, E., & Maclagan, M. (2001). 'Capturing a sound change': A real time study over 15 years of the NEAR/SQUARE diphthong merger in New Zealand English. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 21(2), 215-238.
9. Hay, J., Drager, K., & Warren, P. (2009). Careful who you talk to: An effect of experimenter identity on the production of the NEAR/SQUARE merger in New Zealand English. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 29(2), 269-285.
10. Hay, J., Jannedy, S., & Mendoza-Denton, N. (1999). Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design and style. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp.1389-1392.
11. Hay, J., Nolan, A., & Drager, K. (2006). From Fush to Feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review, 23(3), 351-379.
12. Hay, J., Warren, P., & Drager, K. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 458-484.
13. Holmes, J., & Bell, A. (1992). On shear markets and sharing sheep: The merger of EAR and AIR diphthongs in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change, 4, 251-273.
14. Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp.145-165). San Diego: Academic Press.
15. Johnson, K. (2006). Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 485-499.
16. Maclagan, M., & Gordon, E. (1996). Out of the AIR and into the EAR: Another view of the New Zealand diphthong merger. Language Variation and Change, 8, 125-147.
17. Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 62-85.
18. Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency effects and emergent grammar (pp.137-158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Pierrehumbert, J. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 7 (pp.101-139). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Pierrehumbert, J. (2003). Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In R. Bod, J. Hay, & S. Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic linguistics (pp.177-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. R: Development Core Team (2004). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing (http://www.r-project.org).
22. Rickford, J., & McNair-Knox, F. (1994). Addressee- and topic- influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp.235-76). New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Strand, E.A., & Johnson, K. (1996). Gradient and visual speaker normalization in the perception of fricatives. In D. Gibbon (Ed.), Natural language processing and speech technology (pp.14-26). Berlin: Mouton.
24. Warren, P., Hay, J., & Thomas, B. (2007). The loci of sound change effects in recognition and perception. In J. Cole & J. I. Hualde (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 9 (pp.87-112). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
25. Wells, J.C. (1982). Accents of English (3 Volumes). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.