A value-based framework for internet peering agreements

2010 22nd International Teletraffic Congress - Proceedings, ITC 22

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Dhamdhere, Amogh ^a   Dovrolis, Constantine ^b   Francois, Pierre ^c  

^a CAIDA ^*  (China)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

END-TO-END PATH; FAIR PRICE; GLOBAL INTERNET; NETWORK TYPES; VALUE-BASED;

INTERNET; INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS; PROFITABILITY;

PEER TO PEER NETWORKS;

EID: 78650114719     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ITC.2010.5608736     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. A. Dhamdhere and C. Dovrolis, "A Model of Interdomain NetworkFormation, Economics and Routing," Georgia Tech Technical Report GT-CS-09-09, 2009.
2. W. Muhlbauer, A. Feldmann, O. Mannel, M. Roughan, and S. Uhlig, "Building an AS-Topology Model that Captures Route Diversity," in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Pisa, Italy, 2006.
3. W. B. Norton, "Transit Cost Survey," www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/ pdf/bill. norton.2.pdf, Jul 2006.
4. E. Jahn and J. Prfer, "Interconnection and competition among asymmetric networks in the Internet backbone market," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, 2007.
5. N. Badasyan and S. Chakrabarti, "A simple game-theoretic analysis of peering and transit contracting among internet service providers," Telecommunications Policy, vol. 32, no. 1, 2008.
6. S. Lippert and G. Spagnolo, "Internet peering as a network of relations," Telecommunications Policy, 2008.
7. G. Shrimali and S. Kumar, "Paid peering among internet service providers," in Proc. GameNets workshop on Game theory for communications and networks, 2006.
8. L. He and J. Walrand, "Pricing and Revenue Sharing Strategies for Internet Service Providers," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, May 2006.
9. R. T. Ma, D. Chiu, J. C. Lui, V. Misra, and D. Rubenstein, "On Cooperative Settlement Between Content, Transit and Eyeball Internet Service Providers," in Proc. ACM CoNEXT, 2008.
10. R. T. B. Ma, D. Chiu, J. C. S. Lui, V. Misra, and D. Rubenstein, "Internet Economics: the use of Shapley Value for ISP Settlement," in Proc. ACM CoNEXT, 2007.
11. E. Anshelevich, A. Dasgupta, E. Tardos, and T. Wexler, "Near-optimal Network Design with Selfish Agents," in Proc. STOC, 2003.
12. E. Anshelevich, B. Shepherd, and G. Wilfong, "Strategic Network Formation through Peering and Service Agreements," in Proc. FOCS, 2006.
13. R. Johari, S. Mannor, and J. Tsitsiklis, "A Contract-based Model for Directed Network Formation," Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 56, no. 2, August 2006.
14. H. Chang, S. Jamin, and W.Willinger, "To Peer or Not to Peer: Modeling the Evolution of the Internet's AS-Level Topology," in Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2006.
15. W. B. Norton, "A Business Case for ISP Peering," Equinix white papers, 2002.
16. -, "The Art of Peering: The Peering Playbook," Equinix white papers, 2002.
17. -, "The Peering Simulation Game," Equinix white papers, 2002.
18. P. Faratin, D. Clark, P. Gilmore, S. Bauer, A. Berger, and W. Lehr, "Complexity of internet interconnections: Technology, incentives and implications for policy," in 35th Annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, 2007.