Evaluation of Multimodal Interfaces for Ambient Intelligence

Human-Centric Interfaces for Ambient Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 347-370

  Möller, Sebastian ^a   Engelbrecht, Klaus Peter ^a   Kühnel, Christine ^a   Naumann, Anja ^a   Wechsung, Ina ^a   Weiss, Benjamin ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650104199     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374708-2.00014-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Adcock A., Van Eck R. Reliability and factor structure of the Attitude Toward Tutoring Agent Scale (ATTAS). Journal of Interactive Learning Research 2005, 16(2):195-217.
2. Augusto J.C. Ambient intelligence: Basic concepts and applications. Selected Papers from ICSOFT'06 2008, 14-24. Springer Verlag.
3. Bennett C.L., Black A.W. The Blizzard challenge 2006. Satellite Workshop, INTERSPEECH 2006.
4. Bernsen N.O. Multimodality in language and speech systems-from theory to design support tool. Multimodality in Language and Speech Systems 2002, 93-148. Kluwer Academic Publishers. B. Granström, D. House, I. Karlsson (Eds.).
5. Bernsen N.O., Dybkjær H., Dybkjær L. Designing Interactive Speech Systems-From First Ideas to User Testing 1998, Springer.
6. Bernsen N.O, Dybkjær L, Kiilerich S. Evaluating conversation with Hans Christian Andersen. Proc. LREC 2004, 1011-1014.
7. Bevan N. Usability is quality of use. Proc. HCII 1995 1995, 349-354. Elsevier.
8. Borg G. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:377-81.
9. Brooke J. SUS: A "quick and dirty" usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry 1996, 189-194. Taylor & Francis. P.W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B.A. Weerdmeester, B.A. McClelland (Eds.).
10. Chateau N., Gros L., Durin V., Macé A. Redrawing the link between customer satisfaction and speech quality. Proc. 2nd ISCA/DEGA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Perceptual Quality of Systems 2006, 88-94.
11. Dybkjær L., Bernsen N.O., Minker W. Evaluation and usability of multimodal spoken language dialogue systems. Speech Comm 2004, 43:33-54.
12. Engelbrecht K.-P., Kruppa M., Möller S., Quade M. MeMo workbench for semi-automated usability testing. Proc. INTERSPEECH 2008 2008, 1662-1665.
13. P.807 Deliverable 1. Jupiter II-Usability, Performability and Interoperability Trials in Europe 1998, Eurescom Project, European Institute for Research and Strategic Studies in Telecommunications.
14. Fagel S., Bailly G., Elisei F. Intelligibility of natural and 3D-cloned German speech. Proc. Audio-Visual Speech Processing Workshop (AVSP 2007) 2007, Hilvarenbeek.
15. Fagel S., Clemens C. An articulation model for audiovisual speech synthesis - determination, adjustment, evaluation. Speech Comm 2004, 44:141-154.
16. Fraser N. Assessment of interactive systems. Handbook on Standards and Resources for Spoken Language Systems 1997, 564-615. Mouton de Gruyter. D. Gibbon, R. Moore, R. Winski (Eds.).
17. Gibbon D, Mertins I, Moore RK, editors. Handbook of Multimodal and Spoken Dialogue Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Grice H. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts 1995, 41-58. Academic Press. P. Cole, J.L. Morgan (Eds.).
19. Hassenzahl M., Burmester M., Koller F. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. Mensch & Computer 2003 2003, 187-196. Teubner. J. Ziegler, G. Szwillus (Eds.).
20. Hassenzahl M., Platz A., Burmester M., Lehner K. Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. Proc. CHI 2000 2000, 201-208. Den Haag.
21. Hermann F., Niedermann I., Peissner M., Henke K., Naumann A. Users interact differently: Towards a usability-oriented taxonomy. Interaction Design and Usability, Proc. HCII 2007 2007, vol. 1:812-817. Springer. J. Jacko (Ed.).
22. Hone K.S., Graham R. Towards a tool for the Subjective Assessment of Speech System Interfaces (SASSI). Natural Language Engineering 2000, 6(3/4):287-303.
23. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs): Part 11: Guidance on Usability 1999, ISO 9241-11, International Organization for Standardization.
24. Parameters Describing the Interaction with Spoken Dialogue Systems 2005, ITU-T Suppl. 24 to P-Series Rec, International Telecommunication Union.
25. A Method for Subjective Performance Assessment of the Quality of Speech Voice Output Devices 1994, ITU-T Rec. P.85, International Telecommunication Union.
26. Subjective Quality Evaluation of Telephone Services Based on Spoken Dialogue Systems 2003, ITU-T Rec. P.851, International Telecommunication Union.
27. Jekosch U. Voice and Speech Quality Perception. Assessment and Evaluation 2005, Springer.
28. Kirakowski J., Corbett M. SUMI: The Software Usability Measurement Inventory. British Journal of Educational Technology 1993, 24(3):210-212.
29. Lamel L., Bennacef S., Gauvain J.L., Dartigues H., Temem J.N. User evaluation of the MASK kiosk. Speech Comm 2002, 38:131-139.
30. Mandryk R.L., Inkpen K., Calvert T.W. Using psycho-physiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour and Information Technology 2006, 25(2):141-158.
31. Mbrola Project, [last accessed 05/22/2008]. http://www.tcts.fpms.ac.be/synthesis/mbrola.html.
32. Möller S. A new taxonomy for the quality of telephone services based on spoken dialogue systems. Proc. 3rd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue 2002, 142-153.
33. Möller S. Quality of Telephone-Based Spoken Dialogue Systems 2005, Springer.
34. Möller S. Messung und Vorhersage der Effizienz bei der Interaktion mit Sprachdialogdiensten. Fortschritte der Akustik-DAGA 2006 2006, 463-464. Braunschweig.
35. Möller S., Krebber J., Smeele P. Evaluating the speech output component of a smart-home system. Speech Comm 2005, 48:1-27.
36. Möller S., Ward N.G. A framework for model-based evaluation of spoken dialog systems. Proc. 9th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue 2008, 182-189. Association for Computational Linguistics.
37. Mostefa D., Garcia M.-N., Choukri K. Evaluation of multimodal components within CHIL: The evaluation packages and results. Proc. LREC 2006 2006, 915-918.
38. Naumann A., Hurtienne J., Israel J.H., Mohs C., Kindsmüller M.C., Meyer H.A., et al. Intuitive use of user interfaces: Defining a vague concept. Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, Proc. HCII 2007 2007, vol. 13:128-136. Springer, LNAI 4562. D. Harris (Ed.).
39. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. Academic Press.
40. Pallett D., Fiscus J., Fisher W., Garofolo J. Benchmark tests for the DARPA spoken language program. Proc. DARPA Human Language Technology Workshop 1993, 7-18.
41. Schnotz W., Bannert M., Seufert T. Towards an integrative view of text and picture comprehension: Visualization effects on the construction of mental models. The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension 2002, 385-416. Erlbaum. J. Otero, A. Graesser, J.A. Leon (Eds.).
42. Schroeder M., Trouvain J. The German text-to-speech synthesis system MARY: A tool for research, development and teaching. International Journal on Speech Technology 2003, 6:365-377.
43. Shani G., Rokach L., Meisles A., Naamani L., Piratla N.M., Ben-Shimon D. Establishing user profiles in the MediaScout recommender system. Proc. IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM 2007) 2007, 470-476.
44. Stelmaszweska H., Fields B., Blandford A. Conceptualising user hedonic experience. Proc. ECCE-12, Living and Working with Technology 2004, 83-89. EACE. D.J. Reed, G. Baxter, M. Blythe (Eds.).
45. Australian Research Council/National Health & Medical Research Council Special Initiative Thinking Systems, [last accessed 05/22/2008]. http://www.thinkinghead.edu.au/.
46. Vilnai-Yavetz I., Rafaeli A., Schneider Yaacov C. Instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism of office design. Environment and Behavior 2005, 37(4):533-551.
47. De Waard D. The Measurement of Drivers' Mental Workload 1996, University of Gröningen, PhD thesis.
48. Wahlster W. SmartKom: Foundations of Multimodal Dialogue Systems 2006, Springer.
49. Walker M.A., Litman D.J., Kamm C.A., Abella A. PARADISE: A framework for evaluating spoken dialogue agents. Proc. ACL/EACL 35th Ann. Meeting of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics 1997, 271-280. M. Kaufmann (Ed.).
50. Wickens C.D. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance 1992, HarperCollins.
51. Zimbardo P.G. Psychologie 1995, Springer.