A new taxonomy for the quality of telephone services based on spoken dialogue systems

Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2002 Workshop - 3rd Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 142-153

  Möller, Sebastian ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPEECH PROCESSING; TELEPHONE SETS;

EVALUATION FRAMEWORK; QUALITY FEATURES; QUALITY-OF-SERVICE; SERVICE-BASED; SPOKEN DIALOGUE SYSTEM; TELEPHONE SERVICES;

TAXONOMIES;

EID: 11244343913     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Niels Ole Bernsen, Hans Dybkjær, and Laila Dybkjær. 1998. Designing Interactive Speech Systems: From First Ideas to User Testing. Springer, D-Berlin.
2. Morena Danieli and Elisabetta Gerbino. 1995. Metrics for evaluating dialogue strategies in a spoken language system. In: Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation. Papers from the 1995 AAAI Symposium, USA-Stanford CA, pages 34-39, AAAI Press, USA-Menlo Park CA.
3. Laila Dybkjær and Niels Ole Bernsen. 2000. Usability issues in spoken dialogue systems. Natural Language Engineering, 6(3-4):243-271.
4. ETSI Technical Report ETR 095, 1993. Human Factors (HF); Guide for Usability Evaluations of Telecommunication Systems and Services. European Telecommunications Standards Institute, F-Sophia Antipolis.
5. EURESCOM Project P.807 Deliverable 1, 1998. Jupiter II - Usability, Performability and Interoperability Trials in Europe. European Institute for Research and Strategic Studies in Telecommunications, D-Heidelberg.
6. Norman Fraser. 1997. Assessment of Interactive Systems. In: Handbook on Standards and Resources for Spoken Language Systems (D. Gibbon, R. Moore and R. Winski, eds.), pages 564-615, Mouton de Gruyter, D-Berlin.
7. H. Paul Grice, 1975. Logic and Conversation, pages 41-58. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts (P. Cole and J. L. Morgan, eds.). Academic Press, USA-New York (NY).
8. Kate S. Hone and Robert Graham. 2001. Subjective Assessment of Speech-System Interface Usability. Proc. 7th Europ. Conf. on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH 2001 - Scandinavia), pages 2083-2086, DK-Aalborg.
9. ITU-T Rec. E.800, 1994. Terms and Definitions Related to Quality of Service and Network Performance Including Dependability. International Telecommunication Union, CH-Geneva, August.
10. Ute Jekosch. 2000. Sprache hören und beurteilen: Ein Ansatz zur Grundlegung der Sprachqualit ätsbeurteilung. Habilitation thesis (unpublished), Universit ät/Gesamthochschule Essen, D-Essen.
11. Candance A. Kamm and Marilyn A. Walker. 1997. Design and Evaluation of Spoken Dialogue Systems. Proc. 1997 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, USA-Santa Barbara (CA), pages 14-17.
12. Candance Kamm, Shrikanth Narayanan, Dawn Dutton, and Russell Ritenour. 1997. Evaluating Spoken Dialogue Systems for Telecommunication Services. Proc. 5th Europ. Conf. on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH'97), 4:2203-2206, GR-Rhodes.
13. Diane J. Litman, Shimei Pan, and Marilyn A. Walker. 1998. Evaluating Response Strategies in a Web-Based Spoken Dialogue Agent. Proc. of the 36th Ann. Meeting of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics and 17th Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL 98), CAN-Montreal.
14. Sebastian Möller. 2000. Assessment and Prediction of Speech Quality in Telecommunications. Kluwer Academic Publ., USA-Boston.
15. Joseph Polifroni, Lynette Hirschman, Stephanie Seneff, and Victor Zue. 1992. Experiments in Evaluating Interactive Spoken Language Systems. In: Proc. DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, pages 28-33.
16. Patti J. Price, Lynette Hirschman, Elizabeth Shriberg, and Elizabeth Wade. 1992. Subject-Based Evaluation Measures for Interactive Spoken Language Systems. In: Proc. DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, pages 34-39.
17. Andrew Simpson and Norman M. Fraser. 1993. Black Box and Glass Box Evaluation of the SUNDIAL System. Proc. 3rd Europ. Conf. on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH'93), 2:1423-1426, D-Berlin.
18. Helmer Strik, Catia Cucchiarini, and Judith M. Kessens. 2001. Comparing the Performance of Two CSRs: How to Determine the Significance Level of the Differences. Proc. 7th Europ. Conf. on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH 2001 - Scandinavia), pages 2091-2094, DK-Aalborg.
19. Marilyn A. Walker, Diane J. Litman, Candance A. Kamm, and Alicia Abella. 1997. PARADISE: A Framework for Evaluating Spoken Dialogue Agents. Proc. of the ACL/EACL 35th Ann. Meeting of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, pages 271-280.
20. Marilyn A. Walker, Diane J. Litman, Candace A. Kamm, and Alicia Abella. 1998. Evaluating Spoken Dialogue Agents with PARADISE: Two Case Studies. Computer Speech and Language, 12(3).