Crossing the chasm with classroom response systems

Journal of Chemical Education

Volumn 87, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1317-1319

  Towns, Marcy H ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650096181     PISSN: 00219584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ed9000624     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Moore, G. A. Crossing the Chasm; Collins Business: New York, 2002.
2. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovation, 4th ed.; Free Press: New York, 1995.
3. Murphy, K.; Knaus, K. Going beyond performance: Using clickers in the classroom to map cognitive efficiency. 20th BCCE, Bloomington, IN, 2008.
4. Mundell, J.; Ferguson, R. Clickers: Assessment and diagnostic tools in classrooms. 20th BCCE, Bloomington, IN, 2008.
5. Bruck, A.; Towns, M.; Robinson, W. R.; Weaver, C. Does the use of CPS correlate to improve student performance on exams?: An analysis of question types through various theoretical lenses. 20th BCCE, Bloomington, IN, 2008.
6. Asirvatham, M. Clickers in organic chemistry: Comparing student accountability and course performance in general and organic chemistry courses. 20th BCCE, Bloomington, IN, 2008.
7. Bunce, D. M.; VandenPlas, J. R.; Havanki, K. L. J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 488-493.
8. Smith, M. K.; Wood, W. B.; Adams, W. K.; Wieman, C.; Knight, J. K.; Guild, N.; Su, T. T. Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-ClassConceptQuestions. Science 2009, 323 (5910), 122-124; DOI: 10.1126/science.1165919.
9. MacArthur, J.; Jones, L. A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2008, 9, 187-195; DOI: 10.1039/b812407h.
10. Asirvatham, M. Clickers in Action: Increasing Student Participation in General Chemistry; W. W. Norton & Co.: New York, 2009.