Simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral total ankle replacement: A patient-based comparison of pain relief, quality of life and functional outcome

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 92 B, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1659-1663

  Barg, A ^a   Knupp, M ^a   Hintermann, B ^a  

^a Chirurgische Klinik Kantonsspital Liestal   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANKLE JOINT; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, ANKLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78650091513     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.25204     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Gougoulias N, Khanna A, Maffulli N. How successful are current ankle replacements?: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop 2010;468:199-208.
2. Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int 2009;30:579-96.
3. Wood PL, Karski MT, Watmough P. Total ankle replacement: the results of 100 mobility total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:958-62.
4. Morgan SS, Brooke B, Harris NJ. Total ankle replacement by the Ankle Evolution system: medium-term outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:61-5.
5. Wood PL, Prem H, Sutton C. Total ankle replacement: medium-term results in 200 Scandinavian total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;90-B:605-9.
6. Valderrabano V, Horisberger M, Russell I, Dougall H, Hintermann B. Etiology of ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop 2009;467:1800-6.
7. Korantana A, Martin Geoghegan J, Shandil M, Dhar S. Simultaneous bilateral total ankle replacement using the STAR: a case series. Foot Ankle Int 2010;31:86-9.
8. Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Dereymaeker G, Dick W. The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop 2004;424:57-68. (Pubitemid 38890857)
9. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al. Clinical rating systems for the anklehindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994;15:349-53. (Pubitemid 24224646)
10. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 37-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
11. Lee KB, Cho SG, Hur CI, Yoon TR. Perioperative complications of HINTEGRA total ankle replacement: our initial 50 cases. Foot Ankle Int 2008;29:978-84.
12. Saltzman CL, Amendola A, Anderson R, et al. Surgeon training and complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 2003;24:514-18. (Pubitemid 36736868)
13. Hutchinson JR, Parish EN, Cross MJ. A comparison of bilateral uncemented total knee arthroplasty: simultaneous or staged? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:40-3. (Pubitemid 43125311)
14. Kim YH, Choi YW, Kim JS. Simultaneous bilateral sequential total knee replacement is as safe as unilateral total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:64-8.
15. Kim YH, Kwon OR, Kim JS. Is one-stage bilateral sequential total hip replacement as safe as unilateral total hip replacement? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:316-20.
16. Powell RS, Pulido P, Tuason MS, Colwell CW Jr, Ezzet KA. Bilateral vs unilateral total knee arthroplasty: a patient-based comparison of pain levels and recovery of ambulatory skills. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:642-9. (Pubitemid 44108558)
17. Reuben JD, Meyers SJ, Cox DD, et al. Cost comparison between bilateral simultaneous, staged, and unilateral total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:172-9. (Pubitemid 28106819)