Analysis of pathologic extent of disease for clinically localized prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and subsequent use of adjuvant radiation in a national cohort

Cancer

Volumn 116, Issue 24, 2010, Pages 5757-5766

  Schreiber, David ^a,b   Rineer, Justin ^c   Yu, James B ^d   Olsheski, Michelle ^a   Nwokedi, Emmanuel ^a   Schwartz, David ^a,b   Choi, Kwang ^a   Rotman, Marvin ^a  

^a SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

adjuvant radiation; prostate cancer; radiation; radical prostatectomy; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTATECTOMY; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION;

ADENOCARCINOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; SEER PROGRAM;

EID: 78650090469     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25561     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Swanson GP, Riggs M, Hermans M,. Pathologic findings at radical prostatectomy: risk factors for failure and death. Urol Oncol. 2007; 25: 110-114.
2. Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2005; 294: 433-439.
3. Makarov DV, Trock BJ, Humphreys EB, et al. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology. 2007; 69: 1095-1101.
4. Trabulsi EJ, Valicenti RK, Hanlon AL, et al. A multi-institutional matched-control analysis of adjuvant and salvage postoperative radiation therapy for pT3-4N0 prostate cancer. Urology. 2008; 72: 1298-1302.
5. Vargas C, Kestin LL, Weed DW, Krauss D, Vicini FA, Martinez AA,. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 61: 714-724.
6. Cozzarini C, Bolognesi A, Ceresoli GL, et al. Role of postoperative radiotherapy after pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy: a single institute experience of 415 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 59: 674-683.
7. Bolla M, van Poppel H, Collette L, et al. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet. 2005; 366: 572-578.
8. Wiegel T, Bottke D, Steiner U, et al. Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 2924-2930.
9. Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006; 296: 2329-2335.
10. Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2009; 181: 956-962.
11. Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Meng MV, Mehta SS, Carroll PR,. The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 2141-2149.
12. Johnson CH, ed. SEER Program Coding and Staging Manual 2004, Revision 1. NIH Pub. No. 04-5581. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2004.
13. Virnig BA, Warren JL, Cooper GS, Klabunde CN, Schussler N, Freeman J,. Studying radiation therapy using SEER-Medicare-Linked Data. Med Care. 2002; 40 (suppl): IV-49-IV-54.
14. NCCN Practice Guidelines in Oncology- v.2.2009 Available at:. Accessed September 24, 2009.
15. Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Scardino PT,. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol. 2002; 167: 528-534.
16. Kupelian P, Katcher J, Levin H, Zippe C, Klein E,. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology. 1996; 48: 249-260.
17. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. The combination of preoperative prostate specific antigen and postoperative pathological findings to predict prostate specific antigen outcome in clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 1998; 160: 2096-2101.
18. Grossfeld GD, Chang JJ, Broering JM, et al. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database. J Urol. 2000; 163: 1171-1177.
19. Stephenson AJ, Shariat SF, Zelefsky MJ, et al. Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2004; 291: 1325-1332.
20. Fine SW, Epstein JI,. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score. J Urol. 2008; 179: 1335-1338.
21. Rajinikanth A, Manoharan M, Soloway CT, Civantos FJ, Soloway MS,. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years. Urology. 2008; 72: 177-182.
22. Chun FK, Steuber T, Erbersdobler A, et al. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Eur Urol. 2006; 49: 820-826.
23. Imamoto T, Suzuki H, Utsumi T, et al. External validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology among Japanese patients. Urology. 2009 Aug 28. [Epub ahead of print].
24. Karakiewicz PI, Eastham JA, Graefen M, et al. Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology. 2005; 66: 1245-1250.
25. Kausik SJ, Blute ML, Sebo TJ, et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2002; 95: 1215-1219.
26. Walz J, Chun FK, Klein EA, et al. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2009; 181: 601-607.
27. Mann MJ, DeCastro GJ, Desai M, Benson MC, McKierman JM,. Predictive significance of surgical margin status after prostatectomy for prostate cancer during PSA era. Urology. 2008; 72: 1203-1207.
28. Stephenson AJ, Wood DP, Kattan MW, et al. Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2009; 182: 1357-1363.
29. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Tomaszewski JE, Wein A,. Prostate specific antigen outcome based on the extent of extracapsular extension and margin status in patients with seminal vesicle negative prostate carcinoma of Gleason score < or = 7. Cancer. 2000; 88: 2110-2115.
30. Lake AM, He C, Wood DP Jr,. Focal positive surgical margins decrease disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy even in organ-confined disease. Urology. 2010 Jan 26. [Epub ahead of print].
31. Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Kattan MW, et al. Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 2035-2041.
32. Moul JW,. Post-radical prostatectomy management options for positive surgical margins: argument for observation. Urol Oncol. 2009; 27: 92-96.
33. Moinpour CM, Hayden KA, Unger JM, et al. Health-related quality of life results in pathologic stage C prostate cancer from a Southwest Oncology Group trial comparing radical prostatectomy alone with radical prostatectomy plus radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 112-120.
34. Van der Kwast TH, Collette L, Van Poppel H, et al. Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911). Virchows Arch. 2006; 449: 428-434.