A colorectal perspective on voluntary submission of outcome data to clinical registries

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 132-139

  Almoudaris, A M ^a   Burns, E M ^a   Bottle, A ^b   Aylin, P ^b   Darzi, A ^a   Faiz, O ^a  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL TUMOR; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REGISTER; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650089249     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7301     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Department of Health. Health Act 1999. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ ukpga/1999/8/contents [accessed 21 September 2010].
2. General Medical Council. Revalidation: Information for Doctors. http://www.gmc-uk.org/GMC-Revalidation-FAQs.pdf-snapshot.pdf [accessed 1 November 2009].
3. Cancer Research UK. Cancer Incidence for Common Cancers - UK Statistics. http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/incidence/commoncancers/ [accessed 1 November 2009].
4. Dawson D, Gravelle H, O'Mahony M, Street A, Weale M, Castelli A, et al., Developing New Approaches to Measuring NHS Outputs and Productivity. Centre for Health Economics: York, 2005.
5. Faiz OD, Brown TJ, Colucci G, Grover M, Clark SK,. Trends in colorectal day case surgery in NHS Trusts between 1998 and 2005. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 935-942.
6. Garout M, Tilney HS, Tekkis PP, Aylin P,. Comparison of administrative data with the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer database. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 155-163.
7. Faiz O, Clark J, Brown T, Bottle A, Antoniou A, Farrands P, et al., Traditional and laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: outcomes in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2006. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 800-806.
8. Faiz O, Warusavitarne J, Bottle A, Tekkis PP, Clark SK, Darzi AW, et al., Nonelective excisional colorectal surgery in English National Health Service Trusts: a study of outcomes from Hospital Episode Statistics data between 1996 and 2007. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210: 390-401.
9. Hospital Episode Statistics. HESonline. http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/ [accessed 1 November 2009].
10. Newschaffer CJ, Bush TL, Penberthy LT,. Comorbidity measurement in elderly female breast cancer patients with administrative and medical records data. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 725-733.
11. Rieker RJ, Hammer E, Eisele R, Schmid E, Högel J,. The impact of comorbidity on the overall survival and the cause of death in patients after colorectal cancer resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2002; 387: 72-76.
12. Almoudaris A, Faiz O,. Response to Thompson et al.: National Bowel Cancer Audit. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 948-950.
13. Dolan SA, Jarman B, Bajekal M, Davies PM, Hart D,. Measuring disadvantage: changes in the underprivileged area, Townsend, and Carstairs scores 1981-91. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995; 49 (Suppl 2): S30-S33.
14. Morgan O, Baker A,. Measuring deprivation in England and Wales using 2001 Carstairs scores. Health Stat Q 2006; Autumn: 28-33.
15. Stocchi L, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, O'Connell MJ, Tepper JE, Krook JE, et al., Impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer: a United States community and cooperative group report. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3895-3902.
16. West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, Cairns A, Finan PJ, Quirke P,. Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 857-865.
17. Dixon J, Sanderson C, Elliott P, Walls P, Jones J, Petticrew M,. Assessment of the reproducibility of clinical coding in routinely collected hospital activity data: a study in two hospitals. J Public Health Med 1998; 20: 63-69.
18. Audit Commission. PbR Data Assurance Framework 2008/9. http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/ AuditCommissionReports/NationalStudies/20090827pbrdataassuranceframework0809rep. pdf [accessed 21 September 2010].
19. Campbell SE, Campbell MK, Grimshaw JM, Walker AE,. A systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. J Public Health Med 2001; 23: 205-211.
20. Daley J, Henderson WG, Khuri SF,. Risk-adjusted surgical outcomes. Annu Rev Med 2001; 52: 275-287.
21. Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Davies HT, Smith PC,. Public reporting on quality in the United States and the United Kingdom. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003; 22: 134-148.
22. Aylin P, Lees T, Baker S, Prytherch D, Ashley S,. Descriptive study comparing routine hospital administrative data with the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland's National Vascular Database. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 461-465.
23. Thompson JW, Pinidiya SD, Ryan KW, McKinley ED, Alston S, Bost JE, et al., Health plan quality-of-care information is undermined by voluntary reporting. Am J Prev Med 2003; 24: 62-70.
24. The Leapfrog Group. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/ [accessed 1 December 2009].
25. Leonardi MJ, McGory ML, Ko CY,. Publicly available hospital comparison web sites: determination of useful, valid, and appropriate information for comparing surgical quality. Arch Surg 2007; 142: 863-868.
26. Ghaferi AA, Osborne NH, Dimick JB,. Does voluntary reporting bias hospital quality rankings? J Surg Res 2010; 161: 190-194.
27. Hannan EL, Kilburn H Jr, Racz M, Shields E, Chassin MR,. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA 1994; 271: 761-766.
28. Omoigui NA, Miller DP, Brown KJ, Annan K, Cosgrove D III, Lytle B, et al., Outmigration for coronary bypass surgery in an era of public dissemination of clinical outcomes. Circulation 1996; 93: 27-33.
29. Chassin MR, Hannan EL, DeBuono BA,. Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 394-398.
30. American College of Surgeons. National Surgical Improvement Programme. https://acsnsqip.org/login/default.aspx [accessed 6 February 2010].
31. Dimick JB, Chen SL, Taheri PA, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Campbell DA Jr,. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 531-537.
32. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Tusler M,. Hospital performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005; 24: 1150-1160.