Development of a unidimensional composite measure of neuropsychological functioning in older cardiac surgery patients with good measurement precision

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1041-1049

  Jones, Richard N ^a,b,e,g   Rudolph, James L ^c,d,g   Inouye, Sharon K ^a,b,e,g   Yang, Frances M ^a,b,e,g   Fong, Tamara G ^b,e,g   Milberg, William P ^c,d,g   Tommet, Douglas ^a,b   Metzger, Eran D ^a,g   Cupples, L Adrienne ^f   Marcantonio, Edward R ^b,e,g  

^a Hebrew Senior Life   (United States)

^b Aging Brain Center   (United States)

^c VA BOSTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^g HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Aged; Cardiac surgery; Cognition; Item response theory; Neuropsychology

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 78650083528     PISSN: 13803395     EISSN: 1744411X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803391003662728     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Army Individual Test Battery (1944). Trail Making Tests A and B. Washington, DC: War Department, Adjutant General's Office.
2. Atkins, D. C., Bedics, J. D., McGlinchey, J. B., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2005). Assessing clinical significance: Does it matter which method we use? Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 73(5), 982.
3. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
4. Bentler, P., & Chou, C. (1988). Practical issues in structural equation modeling. In J. Long (Ed.), Common problems/proper solutions: Avoiding error in quantitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Benton, A., & Hamsher, K. (1976). Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
6. Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46(4), 443-459.
7. Brandt, J., & Benedict, R. H. B. (1991). Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications.
9. Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, A. K. S. (1960). The individual or group Culture Fair Intelligence Test. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
11. Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189-225.
12. Crane, P. K., Narasimhalu, K., Gibbons, L. E., Mungas, D. M., Haneuse, S., Larson, E. B., et al. (2008). Item response theory facilitated cocalibrating cognitive tests and reduced bias in estimated rates of decline. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(10), 1018-1027, e1019.
13. D'Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A., & D'Agostino, R. B., Jr. (1990). A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. The American Statistician, 44(4), 316-321.
14. Ernest, C. S., Murphy, B. M., Worcester, M. U., Higgins, R. O., Elliott, P. C., Goble, A. J., et al. (2006). Cognitive function in candidates for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 82(3), 812-818.
15. Gilman, S. (1965). Cerebral disorders after open-heart operations. New England Journal of Medicine, 272, 489-498.
16. Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191.
17. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185.
18. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecifications. Psychological Methods, 4, 424-453.
19. Jöreskog, K. G., & Moustaki, I. (2001). Factor analysis of ordinal variables: A comparison of three approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(3), 347-387. (Pubitemid 33571332)
20. Kanne, S. M., Balota, D. A., Storandt, M., McKeel, D. W., Jr., & Morris, J. C. (1998). Relating anatomy to function in Alzheimer's disease: Neuropsychological profiles predict regional neuropathology 5 years later. Neurology, 50(4), 979-985.
21. Kay, G. G., & Granville, L. J. (2005). Antimuscarinic agents: Implications and concerns in the management of overactive bladder in the elderly. Clinical Therapeutics, 27(1), 127-138; quiz 139-140.
22. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Preacher, K. J., MacCallum, R. C., Atkinson, C., Malarkey, W. B., & Glaser, R. (2003). Chronic stress and age-related increases in the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100(15), 9090-9095.
23. Likosky, D. S., Nugent, W. C., & Ross, C. S. (2005). Improving outcomes of cardiac surgery through cooperative efforts: The northern new England experience. Seminars in Cardiothoracic Vascular Anesthesia, 9(2), 119-121.
24. Mack, W. J., Freed, D. M., Williams, B. W., & Henderson, V. W. (1992). Boston Naming Test: Shortened versions for use in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Gerontology, 47(3), P154-P158.
25. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. McHorney, C. A. (2003). Ten recommendations for advancing patient-centered outcomes measurement for older persons. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139 (5, Pt. 2), 403-409.
27. Mislevy, R. J. (1986). Recent developments in the factor analysis of categorical variables. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11(1), 3-31.
28. Murkin, J. M., Newman, S. P., Stump, D. A., & Blumenthal, J. A. (1995). Statement of consensus on assessment of neurobehavioral outcomes after cardiac surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 59(5), 1289-1295.
29. Muthen, B., & Kaplan, D. H., M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 531-562.
30. Newman, M. F., Kirchner, J. L., Phillips-Bute, B., Gaver, V., Grocott, H., Jones, R. H., et al. (2001). Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. New England Journal of Medicine, 344(6), 395-402.
31. Newman, S., Stygall, J., Hirani, S., Shaefi, S., & Maze, M. (2007). Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after noncardiac surgery: A systematic review. Anesthesiology, 106(3), 572-590.
32. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill College Division.
33. Ozer, D. J., & Reise, S. P. (1994). Personality assessment. Annual Reviews in Psychology, 45(1), 357-388.
34. Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2005). Item response theory and the measurement of clinical change. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 228-238.
35. Rosamond, W., Flegal, K., Friday, G., Furie, K., Go, A., Greenlund, K., et al. (2007). Heart disease and stroke statistics-2007 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation, 115(5), e69-e171.
36. Rosengart, T. K., Sweet, J., Finnin, E. B., Wolfe, P., Cashy, J., Hahn, E., et al. (2005). Neurocognitive functioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention: Evidence of impairment before intervention compared with normal controls. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 80(4), 1327-1334; discussion 1334-1325.
37. Royston, P. (2005). Multiple imputation of missing values: Update. STATA Journal, 5(2), 118-201.
38. Rudolph, J. L., Jones, R. N., Levkoff, S. E., Rockett, C., Inouye, S. K., Selke, F. W., et al. (2009). Derivation and validation of a preoperative prediction rule for delirium after cardiac surgery. Circulation, 119, 229-236.
39. Speer, D. C. (1992). Clinically significant change: Jacobson and Truax (1991) revisited. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(3), 402-408.
40. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677-680.
41. Stuss, D. T., & Levine, B. (2002). Adult clinical neuropsychology: Lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annual Reviews in Psychology, 53, 401-433.
42. Trenerry, M. R., Crosson, B., DeBoe, J., & Leber, W. R. (1990). Visual Search and Attention Test (VSAT). Odessa, FL Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
43. van Dijk, D., Spoor, M., Hijman, R., Nathoe, H. M., Borst, C., Jansen, E. W., et al. (2007). Cognitive and cardiac outcomes 5 years after off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(7), 701-708.
44. Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
45. Zalsman, G., Weizman, A., Carel, C. A., & Aizenberg, D. (2001). Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15): A sensitive and convenient instrument for measuring depression in young anorexic patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189(5), 338-339.
46. Zwick, W., & Velicer, W. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 432-442.