Assessing clinical significance: Does it matter which method we use?

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 982-989

  Atkins, David C ^a   Bedics, Jamie D ^a   McGlinchey, Joseph B ^b,d   Beauchaine, Theodore P ^c  

^a FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical significance; Psychometrics; Psychotherapy outcome

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DEPRESSION; GERONTOPSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 27844524459     PISSN: 0022006X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.982     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
2. Bauer, S., Lambert, M. J., & Nielsen, S. L. (2004). Clinical significance methods: A comparison of statistical techniques. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 60-70.
3. Beutler, L. E., & Moleiro, C. (2001). Clinical versus reliable and significant change. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 441-445.
4. Christensen, A., Atkins, D. C., Berns, S. B., Wheeler, J., Baucom, D. H., & Simpson, L. (2004). Integrative versus traditional behavioral couple therapy for moderately and severely distressed couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 176-191.
5. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1959). Interpretation of reliability and validity coefficients: Remarks on a paper by Lord. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 230-237.
6. Gladis, M. M., Gosch, E. A., Dishuk, N. M., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1999). Quality of life: Expanding the scope of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Significance, 67, 320-331.
7. Hageman, W. J., & Arrindell, W. A. (1999). Establishing clinically significant change: Increment of precision and the distinction between individual and group level of analysis. Behavior Research and Therapy, 37, 1169-1193.
8. Hsu, L. M. (1989). Reliable changes in psychotherapy: Taking into account regression toward the mean. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 459-467.
9. Hsu, L. M. (1999). Caveats concerning comparisons of change rates obtained with five methods of identifying significant client changes: Comment on Speer and Greenbaum (1995). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 594-598.
10. Jacobson, N. S., Dobson, K. S., Truax, P. A., Addis, M. E., Koerner, K., Gollan, J. K., et al. (1996). A component analysis of cognitive-behavioral treatment for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 295-304.
11. Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984). Toward a standard definition of clinically significant change. Behavior Therapy, 17, 308-311.
12. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
13. Kendall, P. C., Marrs-Garcia, A., Nath, S. R., Sheldrick, R. C. (1999). Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Significance, 67, 285-299.
14. Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (pp. 139-193). New York: Wiley.
15. Maassen, G. H. (2000). Principles of defining reliable change indices. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 622-632.
16. McGlinchey, J. B., Atkins, D. C., & Jacobson, N. S. (2002). Clinical significance methods: Which one to use and how useful are they? Behavior Therapy, 33, 529-550.
17. Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Sawyer, J. D. (1995). Clinical significance of the National Institute of Mental Health treatment of depression collaborative research program data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 321-326.
18. Ogles, B. M., Lunnen, K. M., & Bonesteel, K. (2001). Clinical significance: History, application, and current practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 421-446.
19. R Development Core Team (2004). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
20. Sheldrick, R. C., Kendall, P. C., & Heimberg, R. G. (2001). The clinical significance of treatments: A comparison of three treatments for conduct disordered children. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 418-429.
21. Speer, D. C. (1992). Clinically significant change: Jacobson and Truax (1991). revisited. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 402-408.
22. Speer, D. C. (1999). What is the role of two-wave designs in clinical research? Comment on Hageman and Arrindell. Behaviour, Research and Therapy, 37, 1203-1210.
23. Speer, D. C, & Greenbaum, P. E. (1995). Five methods for computing significant individual client change and improvement rates: Support for an individual growth curve approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 1044-1048.
24. Suen, H. K., & Ary, D. (1989). Analyzing quantitative behavioral observation data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.