Influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing total knee replacement: A prospective analysis of 410 consecutive cases

Knee

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 375-380

  Bauer, T ^a   Biau, D ^a   Colmar, M ^b   Poux, X ^c   Hardy, P ^a   Lortat Jacob, A ^a  

^a HÔPITAL AMBROISE PARÉ   (France)

^b Clinique Jeanne d'arc   (France)

^c Laboratoire Ceraver   (France)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Knee flexion; Posterior condylar offset; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT DEGENERATION; KNEE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 78650076022     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.001     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Hawker G., Wright J., Coyte P., Paul J., Dittus R., Croxford R., et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80:163-173.
2. Heck D.A., Robinson R.L., Partridge C.M., Lubitz R.M., Freund D.A. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1998, 356:93-110.
3. Noble P.C., Conditt M.A., Cook K.F., Mathis K.B. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2006, 452:35-43.
4. Maloney W.J., Schurman D.J. The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. Clin Orthop 1992, 278:147-152.
5. Akagi M., Ueo T., Matsusue Y., Akiyama H., Nakamura T. Improved range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the total condylar versus the KU knee. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1997, 56:225-232.
6. Dennis D., Komistek R., Stiehl J., Walker S., Dennis K. Range of motion following total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13:748-752.
7. Aigner C, Windhager R, Pechmann M, Rehak P, Engeleke K The influence of an anterior-posterior gliding mobile bearing on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:2257-2262.
8. Kim Y.H., Yoon S.H., Kim J.S. Range of motion of standard and high flexion stabilized total knee prostheses: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1470-1475.
9. Kettelkamp D.B., Johnson R.J., Smidt G.L., Chao E.Y., Walker M. An electrogoniometric study of knee motion in normal gait. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970, 52:775-790.
10. Laubenthal K.N., Smidt G.L., Kettelkamp D.B. A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living. Phys Ther 1972, 52:34-43.
11. Insall J., Scott W.N., Ranawat C.S. The total condylar knee prosthesis: a report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979, 61:173-180.
12. Menke W., Schmitz B., Salm S. Range of motion after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1992, 111:280-281.
13. Harvey I.A., Barry K., Kirby S.P., Johnson R., Elloy M.A. Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993, 75:950-955.
14. Anouchi Y.S., McShane M., Kelly F., Elting J., Stiehl J. Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1996, 331:87-92.
15. Lizaur A., Marco L., Cebrian R. Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997, 97:626-629.
16. Ritter M.A., Harty L.D., Davis K.E., Meding J.B., Berend M.E. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: clustering, log-linear regression and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85:1278-1285.
17. Ritter M.A., Berend M.E., Harty L.D., Davis K.E., Meding J.B., Keating E.M. Predicting range of motion after revision total knee arthroplasty: clustering and log-linear regression analyses. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:338-343.
18. Harwin S.F., Greene K.A., Hitt K. Early experience with a new total knee implant: maximizing range of motion and function with gender-specific sizing. Surg Technol Int 2007, 16:199-205.
19. Shoji H., Solomonow M., Yoshino S., D'Ambrosia R., Dabezies E. Factors affecting postoperative flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1990, 13:643-649.
20. Parsley B.S., Engh G.A., Dwyer K.A. Preoperative flexion: does it influence postoperative flexion after posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop 1992, 275:204-210.
21. Emerson R.H., Ayers C., Gead W.C., Higgins L.L. Surgical closing in primary total knee arthroplasties: flexion versus extension. Clin Orthop 1996, 331:74-80.
22. Bellemans J., Robjijns F., Duericnkx J., Banks S., Vandenneucker J. The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005, 13:193-196.
23. Gandhi R., de Beer J., Leone J., Petruccelli D., Winemaker M., Adili A. Predictive risk factors for stiff knees in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:46-52.
24. Goldstein WM, Raab DJ, Gleason TF, Branson JJ, Berland K Why posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting total knee replacements have similar ranges of motion. The importance of posterior condylar offset and cleanout of posterior condylar space. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:182-188.
25. Keating E.M., Ritter M.A., Harty L.D., Haas G., Meding J.B., Faris P.M., et al. Manipulation after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:282-286.
26. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty: influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002, 84:50-53.
27. Massin P., Gournay A. Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:889-896.
28. Soda Y., Oishi J., Nakasa T., Nishikawa K., Ochi M. New parameter of flexion after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: posterior condylar offset ratio on X-ray photographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007, 127:167-170.
29. Hanratty B.M., Thompson N.W., Wilson R.K., Beverland D.E. The influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after total knee replacement using a cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:915-918.
30. Huang H.T., Su J.Y., Wang G.J. The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:674-679.
31. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Scuderi G.R., Zingde S. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2007, 464:53-60.
32. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control. 1974, 19:716-723.
33. Hastie T., Tibshirani R. Generalized additive models. Stat Sci 1986, 1:297-318.
34. R Development Core Team (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
35. Lam LO, Swift S, Shakespeare D Fixed flexion deformity and flexion after total knee arthroplasty: what happens in the first 12 months after surgery and can a poor outcome be predicted?. Knee 2003, 10:181-185.
36. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Mahfouz M.R., Haas B.D., Stiehl J.B. Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2003, 416:37-57.
37. Banks S., Bellemans J., Nozaki H., Whiteside L.A., Harman M., Hodge W.A. Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 2003, 410:131-138.
38. Victor J., Banks S., Bellemans J. Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:646-655.
39. Gupta S.K., Ranawat A.S., Shah V., Zikria B.A., Zikria J.F., Ranawat C.S. The PFC Sigma RP-F TKA designed for improved performance: a matched-pair study. Orthopedics 2006, 29:S49-S52.
40. Figgie H.E., Goldberg V.M., Heiple K.G., Moller H.S., Gordon N.H. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986, 68:1035-1040.
41. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M. Posterior cruciate ligament balancing during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1988, 3:323-326.
42. Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K, Yamamoto T Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:59-62.
43. Dennis D.A. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causes and cure. Orthopedics 2001, 24:901-902.
44. Bengs B.C., Scott R.D. The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthropla sty 2006, 21:650-655.
45. Boldt J.G., Stiehl J.B., Holder J., Zanetti M., Munzinger U. Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2006, 30:420-425.
46. Mihalko W., Fishkin Z., Krakow K. Patellofemoral overstuff and its relationship to flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2006, 449:283-287.
47. Colwell C.W., Morris B.A. The influence of continuous passive motion on the results of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1992, 276:225-228.
48. Jordan L.R., Siegel J.L., Olivo J.L. Early flexion routine: an alternative method of continuous passive motion. Clin Orthop 1995, 315:231-233.
49. Peters C.L., Shirley B., Erickson J. The effect of a new multimodal perioperative anesthetic regimen on postoperative pain, side effects, rehabilitation, and length of hospital stay after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:132-138.
50. Yoshiya S., Matsui N., Komistek R.D., Dennis D.A., Mahfouz M., Kurosaka M. In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:777-783.
51. Kansara D., Markel D.C. The effect of posterior tibial slope on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:809-813.
52. Schurman D.J., Rojer D.E. Total knee arthroplasty: range of motion across five systems. Clin Orthop 2005, 430:132-137.
53. Mizner R.L., Patterson S.C., Stevens J.E., Axe M.J., Snyder-Makler L. Preoperative quadriceps strength predicts functional ability one year after total knee arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2005, 32:1533-1539.
54. Coudeyre E., Jardin C., Givron P., Ribinik P., Revel M., Rannou F. Could preoperative rehabilitation modify postoperative outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty? Elaboration of French clinical practice guidelines. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2007, 50:189-197.
55. Jaggers JR, Simpson CD, Frost KL, Quesada PM, Topp RV, Swank AM, et al. Prehabilitation before knee arthroplasty increases postsurgical function: a case study. J Strength Cond Res 2007, 21:632-634.
56. Schurman D.J., Matityahu A., Goodman S.B., Maloney W., Woolson S., Shi H., et al. Prediction of postoperative knee flexion in Insall-Burstein II total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998, 353:175-184.