Seismic design of RC structures: A critical assessment in the framework of multi-objective optimization

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1623-1639

  Lagaros, Nikos D ^a   Papadrakakis, Manolis ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Limit state fragility; Multi objective optimization; Performance based design; Prescriptive design procedures; Reinforced concrete buildings

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE BUILDINGS; OPTIMIZATION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN; REINFORCED-CONCRETE BUILDINGS;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

BUILDING CODE; BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; OPTIMIZATION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 34648825351     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.707     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Browning J. Proportioning earthquake-resistant RC frames in central/ eastern U.S. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(6):1267-1280.
2. Qiang X. Need of performance-based earthquake engineering in Taiwan: a lesson from the Chichi earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29(11):1609-1627.
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC). Methodology for evaluation and upgrade of reinforced concrete buildings. Report N. ATC-40, California Seismic Safety Commission, Sacramento, CA, 1996.
4. Applied Technology Council (ATC). NEHRP guidelines for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report No. FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
5. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). Vision 2000: A Framework for Performance-based Seismic Engineering. Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA, 1995.
6. American Society of Civil Engineers. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA-356. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2000.
7. Eurocode 8. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. ENV1998. CEN European Committee for standardization, Brussels, 1996.
8. Frangopol DM. Computer-automated design of structural systems under reliability-based performance constraints. Engineering Computations 1986; 3(2):109-115.
9. Kanagasundaram S, Karihaloo BL. Minimum cost design of reinforced concrete structures. Computers and Structures 1991; 41(6):1357-1364.
10. Moharrami H, Grierson DE. Computer-automated design of reinforced concrete frameworks. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1993; 119(7):2036-2058.
11. Balling RJ, Yao X. Optimization of reinforced concrete frames. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997; 123(2):193-202.
12. Koskisto OJ, Ellingwood BR. Reliability-based optimization of plant precast concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997; 123(3):298-304.
13. Sarma KC, Adeli H. Cost optimization of concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1998; 124(4):570-578.
14. Ganzerli S, Pantelides CP, Reaveley LD. Performance-based design using structural optimization. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29(11):1677-1690.
15. Lagaros ND, Papadrakakis M, Bakas N. Earthquake resistant optimum design of 3D reinforced concrete structures. Earthquake Engineering 2006; 10(4):533-564.
16. Li G, Cheng G. Optimal decision for the target value of performance-based structural system reliability. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2001; 22(4):261-267.
17. Chan C-M, Wang Q. Nonlinear stiffness design optimization of tall reinforced concrete buildings under service loads. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2006; 132(6):978-990.
18. Barakat S, Bani-Hani K, Taha MQ. Multi-objective reliability-based optimization of prestressed concrete beams. Structural Safety 2004; 26(3):311-342.
19. Chan C-M, Zou X-K. Elastic and inelastic drift performance optimization for reinforced concrete buildings under earthquake loads. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33(8):929-950.
20. European Committee for Standardization. Draft for development of eurocode 2: design of concrete structures. ENV 1992-1-1, European Committee for Standardization, 1992.
21. Krawinkler H, Zareian F, Medina RA, Ibarra LF. Decision support for conceptual performance-based design. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(1):115-133.
22. Lagaros ND, Fotis AD, Krikos SA. Assessment of seismic design procedures based on the total cost. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(11):1381-1401.
23. Sullivan TJ, Calvi GM, Priestley MJN, Kowalsky MJ. The limitations and performances of different displacement based design methods. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2003; 7(1):201-241.
24. Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN. A displacement-based seismic design procedure for RC buildings and comparison with EC8. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:1439-1462.
25. Ghobarah A. On drift limits associated with different damage levels. International Workshop on Performance-Based Seismic Design, Bled, Slovenia, 28 June-1 July 2004.
26. Coello Coello CA. An updated survey of GA-based multi-objective optimization techniques. ACM Computing Surveys 2000; 32(2):109-143.
27. Marler RT, Arora JS. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2004; 26(6):369-395.
28. Lagaros ND, Papadrakakis M. Robust seismic design optimization of steel structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2006, in press. DOI 10.1007/s00158-006-0047-5
29. Lagaros ND, Fragiadakis M, Papadrakakis M. Optimum design of shell structures with stiffening beams. AIAA Journal 2004; 42(1):175-184.
30. Papazachos BC, Papaioannou ChA, Theodulidis NP. Regionalization of seismic hazard in Greece based on seismic sources. Natural Hazards 1993; 8(1):1-18.
31. Fajfar P. Towards nonlinear methods for the future seismic codes. In Seismic Design Practice into the Next Century, Booth (ed.). Balkema: Rotterdam, 1998.
32. Mazzolani FM, Piluso V. The Theory and Design of Seismic Resistant Steel Frames. Taylor & Francis, 1996.
33. FEMA-National Institute of Building Sciences. HAZUS-MH MRI, Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology Earthquake Model, Washington, DC, 2003.