Distributional lexical semantics: Toward uniform representation paradigms for advanced acquisition and processing tasks

Natural Language Engineering

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 347-358

  Basili, R ^a   Pennacchiotti, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b YAHOO INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTIONAL PROPERTY; DOCUMENT FREQUENCY; KEY FACTOR OF SUCCESS; LEXICAL SEMANTICS; LOGIC-BASED APPROACH; SEMANTIC PROPERTIES; WORD CO-OCCURRENCE;

SECURITY OF DATA; SEMANTICS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 78650057336     PISSN: 13513249     EISSN: 14698110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1351324910000112     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Basili, R., De Cao, D., Marocco, P., and Pennacchiotti, M. 2007. Learning selectional preferences for entailment or paraphrasing rules. In Proceedings of Recent Advanced in Natural Language Processing '07, Borovets, Bulgaria.
2. Belkin, M., Niyogi, P., and Sindhwani, V. 2006. Manifold regularization: a geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. Journal of Machine Learning Research 7:2399-2434.
3. Berry, M. W., Dumais, S. T., and O'Brien, G. W. 1995. Using linear algebra for intelligent information retrieval. SIAM Review 37(4):573-595.
4. Birkhoff, G., and von Neumann, J. 1936. The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics 37:823-843.
5. Bloehdorn, S., Basili, R., Cammisa, M., and Moschitti, A. 2006. Semantic kernels for text classification based on topological measures of feature similarity. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 06), 18-22 December 2006, pp. 808-812, Hong Kong.
6. Bloehdorn, S., and Moschitti, A. 2007. Combined syntactic and semantic kernels for text classification. In Advances in Information Retrieval - Proceedings of the 29th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2007), 2-5 April 2007, pp. 307-318, vol. 4425, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Rome: Springer.
7. Budanitsky, A., and Hirst, G. 2006. Evaluating WordNet-based measures of semantic distance. Computational Linguistics 32(1):13-47.
8. Bullinaria, J., and Levy, J. P. 2007. Extracting semantic representations from word cooccurrence statistics: a computational study. Behaviour Research Methods 39:510-526.
9. Chiaramella, Y., and Chevallet, J. P. 1992. About retrieval models and logic. The Computer Journal 35:233-242.
10. Church, K. W., and Mercer, R. L. 1993. Introduction to the special issue on computational linguistics using large corpora. Computational Linguistics 19(1):1-24.
11. Collins, M., and Duffy, N. 2002. New ranking algorithms for parsing and tagging: kernels over discrete structures, and the voted perceptron. In ACL'02: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 263-270. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ.
12. Cristianini, N., and Shawe-Taylor, J. 2000. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods. Cambridge University Press.
13. Cristianini, N., Shawe-Taylor, J., and Lodhi, H. 2002. Latent semantic kernels. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 18 (2-3): 127-152.
14. Erk, K., and Padó, S. 2008. A structured vector space model for word meaning in context. In EMNLP'08: Proceedings of conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 897-906.
15. Fenstad, J. E. 1999. Why grammar needs geometry more than lambda-terms. In J. Gerbrandy, M. Marx, M. de Rijke, and Y. Venema Vossiuspers (eds.), Collection of paper for the 50th Birthday of Johan van Benthem. Amsterdam University Press.
16. Firth, J. R. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-55. In Studies in Linguistic Analysis, pp. 1-32.
17. Furnas, G. W., Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Landauer, T. K., Harshman, R. A., Streeter, L. A., and Lochbaum, K. E. 1988. Information retrieval using a singular value decomposition model of latent semantic structure. In Proceedings of SIGIR'88, New York.
18. Gärdenfors, P. 2004. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. The MIT Press.
19. Globerson, A., Chechik, G., Pereira, F., and Tishby, N. 2007. Euclidean embedding of cooccurrence data. Journal of Machine Learning Research 8:2265-2295.
20. Harris, Z. 1968. Mathematical Structures of Language. New York: Interscience Publishers.
21. Haussler, D. July, 1999. Convolution kernels on discrete structures. Technical Report, UCSCCRL-99-10, University of California,
22. Santa Cruz, CA. He, X., and Niyogi, P. 2003. Locality preserving projections. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, Canada.
23. Hofmann, T. 1999. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI'99, Stockholm, Sweden.
24. Kintsch, W. 2000. Metaphor comprehension: a computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7:257-266.
25. Landauer, T., and Dumais, S. 1997. A solution to plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104:211-240.
26. Lin, D. 1998. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar word. In Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL), Montreal, Canada.
27. Lin, D., and Pantel, P. 2001. DIRT-discovery of inference rules from text. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-01), San Francisco, CA.
28. Lowe, W., and McDonald, S. 2000. The direct route: mediated priming in semantic space. In COGSCI 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 675-680.
29. Lund, K., and Burgess, C. 1997. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 28:203-208.
30. Mitchell, T. M., Shinkareva, S. V., Carlson, A., Vicente, L. Malva, K.-M. C., Mason, R. A., and Just, M. A. 2008. Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science 320:1191-1195.
31. Moschitti, A. 2004. A study on convolution kernels for shallow statistic parsing. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 335-342.
32. Moschitti, A., Pighin, D., and Basili, R. 2008. Tree kernels for semantic role labeling. Computational Linguistics 34.
33. Ó Séaghdha, D., and Copestake, A. 2008. Semantic classification with distributional kernels. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), Manchester, UK, pp. 649-656. Coling 2008 Organizing Committee.
34. Pado, S., and Lapata, M. 2007. Dependency-based construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics 33(2):161-199.
35. Pantel, P., Bhagat, R., Coppola, B., Chklovski, T., and Hovy, E. 2007. Isp: Learning inferential selectional preferences. In Proceedings of HLT/NAACL, Rochester, NY, USA.
36. Pantel, P., and Lin, D. 2003. Automatically discovering word senses. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology/North American Association for Computational Linguistics, Edmonton, Canada.
37. Pennacchiotti, M., De Cao, D., Basili, R., Croce, D., and Roth, M. 2008. Automatic induction of framenet lexical units. In Proceedings of The Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2008) Waikiki, Honolulu, Hawaii.
38. Pereira, F. C. N., Tishby, N., and Lee, L. 1993. Distributional clustering of english words. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, pp. 183-190.
39. Pollard, C., and Sag, I. 1994. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Roweis, S., and Saul, L. 2000. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 290(5500):2323-2326.
41. Sahlgren, M. 2006. The Word-Space Model. PhD thesis, Stockholm University.
42. Salton, G., Wong, A., and Yang, C. 1975. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM 18:613-620.
43. Saul, L. K., and Roweis, S. T. 2003. Think globally, fit locally: unsupervised learning of low dimensional manifolds. Journal of Machine Learning Research 4:119-155.
44. Schutze, H. 1998. Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics 24(1):97-124.
45. Sindhwani, V., Belkin, M., and Niyogi, P. 2006. The geometric basis of semi-supervised learning. In O. Chapelle, B. S., and A. Zien (eds.), Semi-supervised Learning, pp. 217-235. MIT Press.
46. Sindhwani, V., and Melville, P. 2008. Document-word coregularization for semi-supervised sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of IEEE ICDM.
47. Tenenbaum, J., de Silva, V., and Langford, J. C. 2000. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290:2319-2323.
48. Van der Plas, L. 2008. Automatic Lexico-Semantic Acquisition for Question Answering. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
49. van Rijsbergen, C. J. 1986. A non-classical logic for information retrieval. The Computer Journal 29:481-485.
50. van Rijsbergen, K. 2004. The Geometry of Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
51. van Rijsbergen, C., and Lalmas, M. 1996. An information calculus for information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47:385-398.
52. Vapnik, V. 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
53. Varadarajan, V. S. 1985. Geometry of Quantum Theory. Springer-Verlag.
54. Weinberger, K. Q., and Chapelle, O. 2008. Large margin taxonomy embedding for document categorization. In D. Koller, D. Schuurmans, Y, Bengio, and L. Bottou (eds.), NIPS, pp. 1737-1744. MIT Press.
55. Widdows, D. 2004. Geometry and Meaning. Center for the Study of Language and Information/SRI.
56. Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.