Textual Entailment Features for Machine Translation Evaluation

EACL 2009 - 4th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Proceedings of theWorkshop

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 37-41

  Pado, Sebastian ^a   Galley, Michel ^a   Jurafsky, Dan ^a   Manning, Christopher D ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

EVALUATION METRICS; FEATURES SETS; LEXICAL SIMILARITY; MACHINE TRANSLATION EVALUATIONS; MT EVALUATIONS; REGRESSION MODELLING; SPECIFIC SEMANTICS; SYNTACTIC FEATURES; TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 78650054370     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie. 2005. METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and Summarization, pages 65-72, Ann Arbor, MI.
2. R. Barzilay and N. Elhadad. 2002. Inferring strategies for sentence ordering in multidocument news summarization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 17:35-55.
3. Chris Callison-Burch, Miles Osborne, and Philipp Koehn. 2006. Re-evaluating the role of BLEU in machine translation research. In Proceedings of EACL, pages 249-256, Trento, Italy.
4. Chris Callison-Burch, Cameron Fordyce, Philipp Koehn, Christof Monz, and Josh Schroeder. 2008. Further meta-evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 70-106, Columbus, OH.
5. Yee Seng Chan and Hwee Tou Ng. 2008. MAXSIM: A maximum similarity metric for machine translation evaluation. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 55-62, Columbus, Ohio.
6. William W. Cohen, Robert E. Schapire, and Yoram Singer. 1999. Learning to order things. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 10:243-270.
7. Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. 2005. The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Southampton, UK.
8. Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, Alfio Gliozzo, Efrat Marmorshtein, and Carlo Strapparava. 2006. Direct word sense matching for lexical substitution. In Proceedings of ACL, Sydney, Australia.
9. George Doddington. 2002. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-gram cooccurrence statistics. In Proceedings of HLT, pages 128-132, San Diego, CA.
10. Jeśus Giḿenez and Llúis M`arquez. 2008. A smorgasbord of features for automatic MT evaluation. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 195-198, Columbus, Ohio.
11. Sanda Harabagiu and Andrew Hickl. 2006. Methods for using textual entailment in open-domain question answering. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 905-912, Sydney, Australia.
12. Bill MacCartney and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. Modeling semantic containment and exclusion in natural language inference. In Proceedings of Coling, pages 521-528, Manchester, UK.
13. Bill MacCartney, Trond Grenager, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Daniel Cer, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Learning to recognize features of valid textual entailments. In Proceedings of NAACL, pages 41-48, New York City, NY.
14. Franz Josef Och. 2003. Minimum error rate training in statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 160-167, Sapporo, Japan.
15. Karolina Owczarzak, Josef van Genabith, and Andy Way. 2007. Dependency-based automatic evaluation for machine translation. In Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT/AMTA Workshop on Syntax and Structure in Statistical Translation, pages 80-87, Rochester, NY.
16. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei- Jing Zhu. 2002. BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 311-318, Philadelphia, PA.
17. Matthew Snover, Bonnie Dorr, Richard Schwartz, Linnea Micciulla, and John Makhoul. 2006. A study of translation edit rate with targeted human annotation. In Proceedings of AMTA, pages 223-231, Cambridge, MA.