Piloting in desert ants: Pinpointing the goal by discrete landmarks

Journal of Experimental Biology

Volumn 213, Issue 24, 2010, Pages 4174-4179

  Wehner, Rüdiger ^a   Müller, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Desert ants; Ocymyrmex; Panoramic vision; Piloting

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ANIMALS; ANTS; CUES; HOMING BEHAVIOR; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

FORMICIDAE; OCYMYRMEX; OCYMYRMEX ROBUSTIOR;

EID: 78650047867     PISSN: 00220949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.050674     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Åkesson, S. and Wehner, R. (2002). Visual navigation in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis: are snapshots coupled to a celestial system of reference? J. Exp. Biol. 205, 1971-1978.
2. Benhamou, S., Sauve, P. and Vovet, P. (1990). Spatial memory in large scale movements: efficiency and limitation of the egocentric coding process. J. Theor. Biol. 145, 1-12.
3. Bingman, V. P. (1998). Spatial representation and homing pigeon navigation. In Spatial Representation in Animals (ed. S. Healy), pp. 69-85. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Boeddeker, N., Dittmar, L., Stürzl, W. and Egelhaaf, M. (2010). The fine structure of honeybee head and body yaw movements in a homing task. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 277, 1899-1906.
5. Bolton, B. and Marsh, A. C. (1989). The Afrotropical thermophilic ant genus Ocymyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Nat. Hist. 23, 1267-1308.
6. Bowditch, N. (2002). The American Practical Navigator: An Epitome of Navigation. Bicentennial Edition. Bethesda, MD: National Imagery and Mapping Agency.
7. Cartwright, B. A. and Collett, T. S. (1983). Landmark learning in bees: Experiments and models. J. Comp. Physiol. A 151, 521-543.
8. Cheng, K., Collett, T. S., Pickhard, A. and Wehner, R. (1987). The use of visual landmarks by honeybees: Bees weight landmarks according to their distance from the goal. J. Comp. Physiol A 161, 469-475.
9. Cheung, A., Zhang, S., Stricker, C. and Srinivasan, M. V. (2007). Animal navigation: The difficulty of moving in a straight line. Biol. Cybern. 97, 47-61.
10. Dittmar, L., Stürzl, W., Baird, E., Boeddeker, N. and Egelhaaf, M. (2010). Goal seeking in honeybees: matching of optic flow snapshots? J. Exp. Biol. 213, 2913-2923.
11. Durier, V., Graham, P. and Collett, T. S. (2003). Snapshot memories and landmark guidance in wood ants. Curr. Biol. 13, 1614-1618.
12. Franz, M. O. and Mallot, H. A. (2000). Biomimetic robot navigation. Robotics Autonom. Syst. 30, 133-153.
13. Graham, P. and Cheng, K. (2009a). Which portion of the natural panorama is used for view-based navigation in the Australian desert ant? J. Comp. Physiol. A 195, 681-689.
14. Graham, P. and Cheng, K. (2009b). Ants use panoramic skyline as a visual cue during navigation. Curr. Biol. 19, R935-R937.
15. Graham, P., Durier, V. and Collett, T. S. (2004). The binding and recall of snapshot memories in wood ants (Formica rufa). J. Exp. Biol. 207, 393-398.
16. Graham, P., Philippides, A. and Baddeley, B. (2010). Animal cognition: multi-modal interactions in ant learning. Curr. Biol. 20, R639-R640.
17. Judd, S. P. D. and Collett, T. S. (1998). Multiple stored views and landmark guidance in ants. Nature 392, 710-714.
18. Lambrinos, D., Möller, R., Labhart, T., Pfeifer, R. and Wehner, R. (2000). A mobile robot employing insect strategies for navigation. Robotics Autonom. Syst. 30, 39-64.
19. Marsh, A. C. (1985a). Thermal response and temperature tolerance in a diurnal desert ant, Ocymyrmex barbiger. Physiol. Zool. 58, 629-636.
20. Marsh, A. C. (1985b). Microclimatic factors influencing foraging patterns and success of the thermophilic desert ant, Ocymyrmex barbiger. Insectes Soc. 32, 286-296.
21. Marsh, A. C. (1986). Checklist, biological notes and distribution of ants in the central Namib Desert. Madoqua 14, 333-344.
22. Merkle, T. and Wehner, R. (2010). Desert ants use foraging distance to adapt the nest search to the uncertainty of the path integrator. Behav. Ecol. 21, 349-355.
23. Merkle, T., Knaden, M. and Wehner, R. (2006). Uncertainty about nest position influences systematic search in desert ants. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 3545-3549.
24. Möller, R. (2001). Do insects use templates or parameters for landmark navigation? J. Theor. Biol. 210, 33-45.
25. Möller, R. and Vardy, A. (2006). Local visual homing by matched-filter descent in image distances. Biol. Cybern. 95, 413-430.
26. Möller, R., Lambrinos, D., Pfeifer, R. and Wehner, R. (1999). Do desert ants use partial image matching for landmark navigation? Proc. Neurobiol. Conf. Göttingen 27, 430.
27. Müller, M. and Wehner, R. (1994). The hidden spiral: systematic search and path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J. Comp. Physiol. A 175, 525-530.
28. Müller, M. and Wehner, R. (2010). Path integration provides a scaffold for landmark learning in desert ants. Curr. Biol. 20, 1368-1371.
29. Muser, B., Sommer, S., Wolf, H. and Wehner, R. (2005). Foraging ecology of the thermophilic Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. Austr. J. Zool. 53, 301-311.
30. Narendra, A., Cheng, K. and Wehner, R. (2007). Acquiring, retaining and integrating memories of the outbound distance in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. J. Exp. Biol. 210, 570-577.
31. Nicholson, D. J., Judd, S. P. D., Cartwright, B. A. and Collett, T. S. (1999). Learning walks and landmark guidance in wood ants, Formica rufa. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 1831-1838.
32. Seidl, T. and Wehner, R. (2006). Visual and tactile learning of ground structures in desert ants. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 3336-3343.
33. Stitz, H. (1923). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Land- und Süsswasserfauna Deutsch- Südwestafrikas. Ergebnisse der Hamburger deutsch-südwestafrikanischen Studienreise 1911. Hymenoptera: Formicidae, pp. 143-167. Hamburg.
34. Vardy, A. and Möller, R. (2005). Biologically plausible visual homing methods based on optic flow techniques. Connect. Sci. 17, 47-89.
35. Wallace, D. G., Hines, D. J., Gorny, J. H. and Whishaw, I. Q. (2003). A role for the hippocampus in dead reckoning: An ethological analysis using natural exploratory and food-carrying tasks. In The Neurobiology of Spatial Behaviour (ed. K. J. Jeffery), pp. 31-47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Wehner, R. (1987). Spatial organization of foraging behavior in individually searching desert ants, Cataglyphis (Sahara Desert) and Ocymyrmex (Namib Desert). Experientia 54, 15-42.
37. Wehner, R. and Räber, F. (1979). Visual spatial memory in desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Experientia 35, 1569-1571.
38. Wehner, R. and Srinivasan, M. V. (1981). Searching behaviour of desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). J. Comp. Physiol. 142, 325-338.
39. Wehner, R., Michel, B. and Antonsen, P. (1996). Visual navigation in insects: Coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. J. Exp. Biol. 199, 129-140.
40. Wehner, R., Meier, C. and Zollikofer, C. (2004). The ontogeny of foraging behaviour in desert ants, Cataglyphis bocolor. Ecol. Entomol. 29, 240-250.
41. Zeil, J., Hoffmann, M. I. and Chahl, J. S. (2003). The catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 450-469.