Moral judgments and the role of social harm: Differences in automatic versus controlled processing

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-6

  Usoof Thowfeek, Ramila ^a   Janoff Bulman, Ronnie ^a   Tavernini, Jessica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Automatic processing; Controlled processing; Moral judgment; Morality

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649984066     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dual-process models in social psychology 1999, Guilford Press, NY. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
2. Cushman F., Young L., Hauser M. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment. Psychological Science 2006, 17:1082-1089.
3. Greene J.D., Morelli S.A., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L.E., Cohen J.D. Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition 2008, 107:1144-1154.
4. Greene J.D., Sommerville R.B., Nystrom L.E., Darley J.M., Cohen J.D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 2001, Sept. 14, 293:2105-2108.
5. Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 2001, 108:814-834.
6. Haidt J. The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science 2007, 316:998-1002.
7. Haidt J., Koller S., Dias M. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65:613-628.
8. Janoff-Bulman R., Sheikh S., Hepp S. Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96:521-537.
9. Kohlberg L. Essays on moral development: Vol. I. The philosophy of moral development 1981, Harper & Row, San Francisco.
10. Kohlberg L. Essays on moral development: Vol. II. The psychology of moral development 1984, Harper & Row, San Francisco.
11. Krebs D. Morality: An evolutionary account. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2008, 3:149-172.
12. Monin B., Pizarro D., Beer J.S. Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate. Review of General Psychology 2007, 11:99-111.
13. Muha D. Cheating: When students cheat. Rutgers Focus (online) 2000, Available from http//ur.Rutgers.edu/focus/index.phtml?ArticleID=88&Issue_ID=12. Retrieved on June 20, 2007.
14. Piaget J. The moral judgment of the child 1965, Free Press, New York.
15. Rozin P., Lowery L., Imada S., Haidt J. The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 76:574-586.
16. Strichez M. Many teachers ignore cheating, survey finds. Education Week (online) 2001, Available from www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=34cheat.h20&keyords=Internet%2c%20Plagiarism. Retrieved on June, 20, 2007.
17. Turiel E. The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention 1983, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
18. Turiel E. The development of morality. Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development 1998, 863-932. Wiley, NY, vol. 3. 5th ed. N. Eisenberg (Ed.).
19. Valdesolo P., DeSteno D. The duality of virtue: Deconstructing the moral hypocrite. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44:1334-1338.