Assessing the accuracy and precision of musculoskeletal motion tracking using cine-PC MRI on a 3.0T platform

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 193-197

  Behnam, Abrahm J ^a,b   Herzka, Daniel A ^b   Sheehan, Frances T ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone; Dynamic; Knee; Muscle; Patella; Phantom; Validation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY AND PRECISION; FIELD STRENGTHS; IN-VIVO; KNEE; MOTION TRACKING; PATELLA; PHANTOM; PHASE CONTRASTS; SUBMILLIMETERS; VALIDATION;

BONE; MUSCLE; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CINE PHASE CONTRAST NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; KINEMATICS; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MOVEMENT; MUSCULOSKELETAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649981229     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.029     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ASTM Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods 2010, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. E177-08.
2. Bey M.J., Kline S.K., Tashman S., Zauel R. Accuracy of biplane X-ray imaging combined with model-based tracking for measuring in-vivo patellofemoral joint motion. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2008, 3:38.
3. Boling M., Padua D., Marshall S., Guskiewicz K., Pyne S., Beutler A. Gender differences in the incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2009.
4. Drace J.E., Pelc N.J. Tracking the motion of skeletal muscle with velocity-encoded MR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1994, 4:773-778.
5. Draper C.E., Santos J.M., Kourtis L.C., Besier T.F., Fredericson M., Beaupre G.S., Gold G.E., Delp S.L. Feasibility of using real-time MRI to measure joint kinematics in 1.5T and open-bore 0.5T systems. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008, 28:158-166.
6. Fellows R.A., Hill N.A., Gill H.S., Macintyre N.J., Harrison M.M., Ellis R.E., Wilson D.R. Magnetic resonance imaging for in vivo assessment of three-dimensional patellar tracking. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:1643-1652.
7. Fellows R.A., Hill N.A., Macintyre N.J., Harrison M.M., Ellis R.E., Wilson D.R. Repeatability of a novel technique for in vivo measurement of three-dimensional patellar tracking using magnetic resonance imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005, 22:145-153.
8. Fernandez J.W., Akbarshahi M., Kim H.J., Pandy M.G. Integrating modelling, motion capture and X-ray fluoroscopy to investigate patellofemoral function during dynamic activity. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 11:41-53.
9. Fregly B.J., Rahman H.A., Banks S.A. Theoretical accuracy of model-based shape matching for measuring natural knee kinematics with single-plane fluoroscopy. J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127:692-699.
10. Iwamoto J., Takeda T., Sato Y., Matsumoto H. Retrospective case evaluation of gender differences in sports injuries in a Japanese sports medicine clinic. Gender Med. 2008, 5:405-414.
11. Kalia V., Obray R.W., Filice R., Fayad L.M., Murphy K., Carrino J.A. Functional joint imaging using 256-MDCT: technical feasibility. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009, 192:W295-W299.
12. Laprade J., Lee R. Real-time measurement of patellofemoral kinematics in asymptomatic subjects. Knee 2005, 12:63-72.
13. Last J.M. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 1995, Oxford Univeristy Press, New York.
14. Moore D.C., Hogan K.A., Crisco J.J., Akelman E., Dasilva M.F., Weiss A.P. Three-dimensional in vivo kinematics of the distal radioulnar joint in malunited distal radius fractures. J. Hand Surg. [Am] 2002, 27:233-242.
15. Rebmann A.J., Sheehan F.T. Precise 3D skeletal kinematics using fast phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003, 17:206-213.
16. Seisler A.R., Sheehan F.T. Normative three-dimensional patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics: a dynamic, in vivo study. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 54:1333-1341.
17. Sheehan F.T., Mitiguy P. In regards to the "ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data". J. Biomech. 1999, 32:1135-1136.
18. Sheehan F.T., Zajac F.E., Drace J.E. Using cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging to non-invasively study in vivo knee dynamics. J. Biomech. 1998, 31:21-26.
19. Shibanuma, N., Sheehan, F.T., Lipsky, P., Stanhope, S.J., 2004. Sensitivity of femoral orientation estimates to condylar surface and MR image plane location. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 20, 300-305.
20. Shih Y.F., Bull A.M., McGregor A.H., Amis A.A. Active patellar tracking measurement: a novel device using ultrasound. Am. J. Sports Med. 2004, 32:1209-1217.
21. Tashman S. Comments on "validation of a non-invasive fluoroscopic imaging technique for the measurement of dynamic knee joint motion". J. Biomech. 2008, 41:3290-3291.
22. von Eisenhart-Rothe R., Siebert M., Bringmann C., Vogl T., Englmeier K.H., Graichen H. A new in vivo technique for determination of 3D kinematics and contact areas of the patello-femoral and tibio-femoral joint. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:927-934.
23. Wilson, N.A., Press, J.M., Koh, J.L., Hendrix, R.W., Zhang, L.Q., 2009. In vivo noninvasive evaluation of abnormal patellar tracking during squatting in patients with patellofemoral pain. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Am.) 91, 558-566.
24. Zhu Y., Drangova M., Pelc N.J. Fourier tracking of myocardial motion using cine-PC data. Magn. Reson. Med. 1996, 35:471-480.