Effects of model formulation and calibration data on uncertainty in dense nonaqueous phase liquids source dissolution predictions

Water Resources Research

Volumn 46, Issue 12, 2010, Pages

  Parker, Jack C ^a   Kim, Ungtae ^a   Widdowson, Mark ^b   Kitanidis, Peter ^c   Gentry, Randy ^a  

^a University of Tennessee Knoxville   (United States)

^b State University   (United States)

^c Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION DATA; COMPLEX MODEL; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; DATA SETS; DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS; DISCHARGE ESTIMATE; DISCHARGE PREDICTIONS; DISCHARGE RATES; DISSOLUTION RATES; DNAPL SOURCE ZONES; FIELD DATA; MASS-DISCHARGE; MODEL FORMULATION; MONITORING WELLS; MULTIPLE FUNCTION; PREDICTION ACCURACY; PREDICTION UNCERTAINTY; RATE PARAMETERS; RELEASE DATE; SIMPLIFIED MODELS; SOURCE DATA; SOURCE FUNCTIONS; SOURCE MASS; TCE CONCENTRATIONS; TRANSPORT MODELS;

CALIBRATION; DISSOLUTION; ESTIMATION; FORECASTING; IMPURITIES; LIQUIDS; MEASUREMENT ERRORS; MONITORING; TRICHLOROETHYLENE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WELLS;

DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS);

CALIBRATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATA SET; ERROR ANALYSIS; MASS TRANSFER; NUMERICAL MODEL; TRICHLOROETHYLENE;

EID: 78649922951     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2010WR009361     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Basu, N. N., P. S. C. Rao, I. C. Poyer, M. D. Annable, and K. Hatfield (2006), Flux-based assessment of a manufacturing site with trichloroethylene, J. Contam. Hydrol., 86, 105-127, doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.02.011.
2. Basu, N. B., P. S. C. Rao, R. W. Falta, M. D. Annable, J. W. Jawitz, and K. Hatfield (2008), Temporal evolution of DNAPL source and contaminant flux distribution: Impacts of source mass depletion, J. Contam. Hydrol., 95, 93-109, doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.08.001.
3. Brooks, M. C., A. L. Wood, M. D. Annable, K. Hatfield, J. Cho, C. Holbert, P. S. C. Rao, C. G. Enfield, K. Lynch, and R. E. Smith (2008), Changes in contaminant mass discharge from DNAPL source mass depletion: Evaluation at two field sites, J. Contam. Hydrol., 102, 140-153.
4. Cardiff, M., X. Liu, P. K. Kitanidis, J. Parker, and U. Kim (2010), Cost optimization of DNAPL source and plume remediation under uncertainty using a semi-analytic model, J. Contam. Hydrol., 113, 25-43, doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009. 11.004.
5. Cho, J., M. D. Annable, J. W. Jawitz, and K. Hatfield (2007), Passive flux meter measurement of water and nutrient flux in porous media, J. Environ. Qual., 36, 1266-1272, doi:10.2134/jeq2006.0370.
6. Christ, J. A., C. A. Ramsburg, K. D. Pennell, and L. M. Abriola (2006), Estimating mass discharge from dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zones using upscaled mass transfer coefficients: An evaluation using multiphase numerical simulations, Water Resour. Res., 42, W11420, doi:10.1029/2006WR004886.
7. Christ, J. A., A. Ramsburg, K. D. Pennell, and L. M. Abriola (2010), Predicting DNAPL mass discharge from pool-dominated source zones, J. Contam. Hydrol., 114, 18-34, doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.02.005.
8. Falta, R. W., P. S. Rao, and N. Basu (2005a), Assessing the impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones: I. Analytical modeling of source strength functions and plume response, J. Contam. Hydrol., 78, 259-280, doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.05.010.
9. Falta, R. W., P. S. Rao, and N. Basu (2005b), Assessing the impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones: II. Coupling source strength functions to plume evolution, J. Contam. Hydrol., 79, 45-66, doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.05.012.
10. Fure, A. D., J. W. Jawitz, and M. D. Annable (2006), DNAPL source depletion: Linking architecture and flux response, J. Contam. Hydrol., 85, 118-140, doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.01.002.
11. Jawitz, J. W., A. D. Fure, G. G. Demmy, S. Berglund, and P. S. C. Rao (2005), Groundwater contaminant flux reduction resulting from nonaqueous phase liquid mass reduction, Water Resour. Res., 41, W10408, doi:10.1029/2004WR003825.
12. Park, E., and J. C. Parker (2005), Evaluation of an upscaled model for DNAPL dissolution kinetics in heterogeneous aquifers, Adv. Water Resour., 28, 1280-1291, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.04.002.
13. Park, E., and J. C. Parker (2008), Effects of mass reduction, flow reduction and enhanced biodecay of DNAPL source zones, Transp. Porous Media, 73, 95-108, doi:10.1007/s11242-007-9164-x.
14. Parker, J. C, and E. Park (2004), Field-scale DNAPL dissolution kinetics in heterogeneous aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 40, W05109, doi:10.1029/ 2003WR002807.
15. Parker, J. C, E. Park, and G. Tang (2008), Dissolved plume attenuation with DNAPL source remediation, aqueous decay and volatilization-Analytical solution, model calibration, and prediction uncertainty, J. Contam. Hydrol, 102, 61-71, doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.03.009.
16. Parker, J. C, U. Kim, P. K. Kitanidis, M. Cardiff, and X. Liu (2010), Stochastic cost optimization of multistrategy DNAPL site remediation, Ground Water Monit. Rem., 30, 65-78, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6592.2010.01287.x.
17. Rao, P. S. C, and J. W. Jawitz (2003), Comment on "Steady-state mass transfer from single-component dense non-aqueous phase liquids in uniform flow fields" by T. C. Sale and D. B. McWhorter, Water Resour. Res., 39(3), 1068, doi:10.1029/2001WR000599.
18. Rao, P. S. C, J. W. Jawitz, C. G. Enfield, R. Falta, M. D. Annable, and A. L. Wood (2001), Technology integration for contaminated site remediation: Cleanup goals and performance metrics, pp. 410-412, Ground Water Qual., Sheffield, U. K.
19. Saenton, S., and I. Illangasekare (2007), Upscaling of mass transfer rate coefficient for the numerical simulation of dense nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution in heterogeneous aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 43, W02428, doi:10.1029/2005WR004274.
20. Sale, T. C, and D. B. McWhorter (2001), Steady state mass transfer from single-component dense nonaqueous phase liquids in uniform flow fields, Water Resour. Res., 37(2), 393-404, doi:10.1029/2000WR900236.
21. Soga, K., J. W. E. Page, and T. H. Illangasekare (2004), A review of NAPL source zone remediation efficiency and the mass flux approach, J. Hazard. Mater., 110, 13-27, doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.034.
22. Unlu, K., J. C. Parker, and P. K. Chong (1995), A comparison of three uncertainty analysis methods to assess groundwater impacts from landdisposed waste, Hydrogeol. J., 3(2), 4-18.
23. Zhu, J., and J. F. Sykes (2004), Simple screening models of NAPL dissolution in the subsurface, J. Contam. Hydrol., 72, 245-258, doi:10.1016/j. jconhyd.2003.11.002.