Stochastic cost optimization of multistrategy DNAPL site remediation

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 65-78

  Parker, Jack ^a   Kim, Ungtae ^a   Kitanidis, Peter K ^b   Cardiff, Michael ^b   Liu, Xiaoyi ^b  

^a University of Tennessee Knoxville   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDITIONAL COSTS; COMPLIANCE RULES; CONCENTRATION DATA; COST OPTIMIZATION; COST SAVING; DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS; DESIGN VARIABLES; ELECTRON DONORS; ENGINEERING PRACTICES; LOWER COST; MEASUREMENT NOISE; MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY; MODEL PREDICTION; NET PRESENT VALUE; NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATIONS; OPTIMIZED DESIGNS; OPTIMIZING DESIGN; PUMP-AND-TREAT; REMEDIATION DESIGN; REMEDIATION SYSTEMS; SIMULTANEOUS OPTIMIZATION; SITE CHARACTERISTICS; SITE REMEDIATION; SOIL CONCENTRATIONS; SOURCE ZONE; SUBTLE INTERACTION; THERMAL SOURCE; TOTAL COSTS;

BIOREMEDIATION; DESIGN; LIQUIDS; MONITORING; OPTIMIZATION; POLLUTION; PUMPS; REAL TIME CONTROL; SOILS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COST REDUCTION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BIOREMEDIATION; CALIBRATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA ACQUISITION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; LAND RECLAMATION; MONITORING SYSTEM; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PUMP AND TREAT; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SOIL PROFILE; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 77955780542     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: 17456592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2010.01287.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aly AH, Peralta RC. Optimal design of aquifer cleanup systems under uncertainty using a neural network and a genetic algorithm. Water Resources Research 1999, 35:2523-2532.
2. Andricevic R, Kitanidis PK. Optimization of the pumping schedule in aquifer remediation under uncertainty. Water Resources Research 1990, 26:875-885.
3. Becker DB, Minser B, Greeenwald R, Zhang Y, Harre K, Yager K, Zheng C, Peralta R. Reducing long-term remedial costs by transport modeling optimization. Ground Water 2006, 44:864-875.
4. Borden RC, Bedient PB. Transport of dissolved hydrocarbons influenced by oxygen limited biodegradation--theoretical development. Water Resources Research 1986, 22:1973-1982.
5. Cardiff M, Liu X, Kitanidis PK, Parker JC, Kim U. Cost optimization of DNAPL source and plume remediation under uncertainty using a semi-analytic model. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2010, 113:25-43.
6. Chan-Hilton AB, TB Culver. Groundwater remediation design under uncertainty using genetic algorithms. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2005, 131:25-34.
7. Cohen RM, Mercer JW. DNAPL Site Evaluation. 1993, Boca Raton, Florida, C. K. Smoley Publication
8. Erickson M, Mayer A, Horn J. Multi-objective optimal design of groundwater remediation systems: Application of the niched Pareto genetic algorithm (NPGA). Advances in Water Resources 2002, 25:51-65.
9. Feyen L, Gorelick SM. Framework to evaluate the worth of hydraulic conductivity data for optimal groundwater resources management in ecologically sensitive areas. Water Resources Research 2005, 41.
10. Gorelick SM, Voss CI, Gill PE, Murray W, Saunders MA. Aquifer reclamation design: The use of contaminant transport simulation combined with nonlinear programming. Water Resources Research 1984, 20:415-427.
11. Heron G, Parker K, Galligan J, Holmes TC. Thermal treatment of eight CVOC source zones to near nondetect concentrations. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation 2009, 29:56-65.
12. Kamanth RK, Newell CJ, Looney BB, Vengelas KM, Perex J. BioBalance-A Mass Balance Toolkit, User's Manual. 2006, Houston, Texas, GSI Environmental Inc
13. Lee S-I, Kitanidis PK. Optimal estimation and scheduling of aquifer remediation with incomplete information. Water Resources Research 1991, 27:2203-2217.
14. Liang H, Falta RW. Modeling field-scale cosolvent flooding for DNAPL source zone remediation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2008, 96:1-16.
15. Liu X, Cardiff M, Kitanidis PK. Parameter estimation in nonlinear environmental problems. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 2010, In press
16. Mayer A, Endres KL. Simultaneous optimization of dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source and contaminant plume remediation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2007, 91:288-311. no.
17. McKinney DC, Lin M-D. Pump-and-treat ground-water remediation system optimization. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 1996, 122:128-136.
18. Mugunthan P, Shoemaker CA. Time varying optimization for monitoring multiple contaminants under uncertain hydrogeology. Bioremediation Journal 2004, 8:129-146.
19. Alternatives for Ground Water Cleanup. 1994, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., National Academy Press
20. Parker JC, Park E, Tang G. Dissolved plume attenuation with DNAPL source remediation, aqueous decay and volatilization-Analytical solution, model calibration, and prediction uncertainty. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2008, 102:61-71.
21. Parker JC, Park E. Modeling field-scale dense nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution kinetics in heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resources Research 2004, 40:W05109.
22. Rittman BR, McCarty PL. Environmental Technology: Principles and Applications. 2001, New York, McGraw-Hill
23. Rizzo DM, Dougherty DE. Design optimization for multiple management period groundwater remediation. Water Resources Research 1996, 32:2549-2561.
24. Sadeghipour J, Yeh WW-G. Parameter identification of groundwater aquifer models: A generalized least squares approach. Water Resources Research 1984, 20:971-979.
25. Teutsch G, Finkel M. Integrated physico-chemical-economic modelling for optimal plume management at contaminated sites: A decision support system. In ModelCARE 2002: Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modelling: A Few Steps Closer to Reality 2002, 69-78. Prague, Czech Republic: IAHS Publications
26. Teutsch G, Rugner H, Zamfirescu D, Finkel M, Bittens M. Source remediation vs. plume management: Critical factors affecting cost-efficiency. Land Contamination and Reclamation 2001, 9:128-142.
27. Thomson NR, Hood ED, Farquhar GJ. Permanganate treatment of an emplaced DNAPL Source. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 2007, 27:74-85.
28. Tucciarelli T, Pinder G. Optimal data acquisition strategy for the development of a transport model for groundwater remediation. Water Resources Research 1991, 27:577-588.
29. Wagner BJ, Shamir U, Nemati HR. Groundwater quality management under uncertainty: Stochastic programming approaches and the value of information. Water Resources Research 1992, 28:1233-1246.
30. Wagner BJ, Gorelick SM. Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty. Water Resources Research 1987, 23:1162-1174.
31. Wymore RA, Macbeth TW, Rothermel JS, Peterson LN, Nelson LO, Sorenson Jr KS, Akladiss N, Tasker IR. Enhanced anaerobic bioremediation in a DNAPL residual source zone: Test Area North case study. Remediation Journal 2006, 16:5-22.