Exploring university alliances and comparable academic cooperation structures

Learning to Compete in European Universities: From Social Institution to Knowledge Business

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 19-47

  Deiaco, Enrico ^a   Gren, Ana M ^a   Melin, Göran ^a  

^a Swedish Institute for Studies in Education and Research   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649903109     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781848446106.00009     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Beerkens, H. (2004), Global Opportunities and Institutional Embeddedness - Higher Education in Europe and Southeast Asia, Enschede: Center for Higher Education and Policy Studies, University of Twente.
2. Broström, A., E. Deiaco and S. Sörlin (2004), ‘Tekniska universitet på världsmarknaden?- motiv och förutsättningar för en strategisk allians mellan KTH och Chalmers’, SISTER working paper 2004, 32.
3. Broström, A., Deiaco E. and G. Melin (2005), ‘Vägval för Örebro universitet och Mälardalens högskola. Utredning av förutsättningarna för fusion, allians eller annan samverkan’, SISTER working papers 2005, 38.
4. Buttner, H.G. (2002), ‘Ideals of the IDEA League’, paper presented at the IMHG General Conference, 16-18 September.
5. Cambridge-MIT Institute (2004), ‘Report by the Controller and Auditor General’, ordered by the House of Commons. Printed 15 April 2004, London: The Stationery Office, information from the website (www.ac.cam.uk), and an interview with Gordon Edge, member of the institute’s advisory board, also available on the National Audit Office website, www.nao.gov.uk.
6. Castells, M. (1996, 1997, 1998), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. 1-3, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7. Clark, B.R. (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press.
8. De Meyer, A., P.T. Harker and G. Hawawini (2004), ‘The globalization of business education’, in H. Gatignon and J.R. Kimberly (eds), The INSEAD-Wharton Alliance on Globalization, Strategies for Building Successful Global Business, London: Cambridge University Press.
9. Florida, R.L. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life, New York: Basic Books.
10. Gatignon, H. and J.R. Kimberly (eds) (2004), The INSEAD - Wharton Alliance on Globalization, Strategies for Building Successful Global Business, London:Cambridge University Press.
11. Georghiou, L. and T. Duncan (2002), ‘Background report on academic mergers, research quality and other added value issues related to the scale institution arising from the merger of UMIST/Victoria University of Manchester’, background report 18.09.02 (PREST).
12. Gomes-Casseres, B. (1996), The Alliance Revolution: The New Shape of Business Rivalry, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Gomes-Casseres, B. (2002), ‘Alliances (inter-firm)', in Routledge Encyclopedia of International Political Economy, Barry Jones (ed.), London: Routledge.
14. Harman, K. and V.L. Meek (2002), ‘Introduction to special issue: “Merger revisited:international perspectives on mergers in higher education” ', Higher Education, 44 (1), 1-4.
15. Lang, W.D. (2002), ‘A lexicon of inter-institutional cooperation’, Higher Education, 44, 153-83.
16. Markusen, A. (1996), ‘Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts’, Economic Geography, 72 (3), 293-313.
17. Neave, G., K. Blückert and T. Nybom (eds) (2006), The European Research University: an Historical Parenthesis?, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Saxenian, A. (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Trow, M. (1996), ‘Trust, markets and accountability in higher education: a comparative perspective’, Higher Education Policy, 9 (4), 309-24.
20. Trow, M. (2005), ‘Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access:forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII’, in Philip Altbach (ed.), International Handbook of Higher Education, Norwell, MA:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21. University College London (2004), Provost’s green paper: towards a vision and strategy for the future of UCL, accessed 7 August, 2008 at www.ucl.ac.uk.
22. Cambridge-MIT Institute (2006a), ‘Opportunities’, accessed 12 April 2007 at www.cambridge-mit.org/opportunity/cmipp/.
23. Cambridge-MIT Institute (2006b), ‘Working in Partnership. Cambridge University & MIT’, downloaded document source, 26 March 2007 at www.cambridgemit. org/object/download/1823/doc/cmi%20brochure%20final.pdf.
24. Cambridge-MIT Institute (2006c), accessed 18 April 2007 at www.cambridgemit. org/projects/.
25. Glasgow-Strathclyde Strategic Alliance (2004), ‘Synergy: a world class partnership’, accessed 29 March 2007 at www.strath.gla.ac.uk/synergy/foreword.html.
26. Harman, G. (1989), ‘The Dawkins reconstruction of Australian higher education’, Higher Education Policy, 2 (2), 25-30.
27. IDEA League (2006), History, 19 September 2006, accessed 26 March 2007 at www.idealeague.org/about/history.
28. INSEAD/Wharton Alliance (2007a), ‘The INSEAD Wharton Alliance’, accessed 14 April 2007 at www.insead.edu/alliance/.
29. INSEAD/Wharton Alliance (2007b), ‘List of alliance center research & dev - elopment projects, accessed 26 March 2007 at www.insead.edu/alliance/faculty/research_projects.htm.
30. International Alliance of Research Universities IARU (2007), IARU Projects, accessed 4 April 2007 at http://info.anu.edu.au/OVC/Alliances/IARU/Projects/index.asp.
31. International Alliance of Research Universities IARU (2007a), IARU Prospectus, accessed 4 April 2007 at http://info.anu.edu.au/OVC/Alliances/IARU/_Files/IARU_prospectus.pdf.
32. McGill (2004), ‘University of Miami and McGill team up’, McGill Reporter. 9 September 2004, 37 (01), accessed 7 August, 2008 at www.mcgill.ca/reporter/37/01/miami/.
33. Øresund University (2007a), ‘Introduction’, accessed 18 April 2007 at www.uni. oresund.org/sw2006.asp.
34. Øresund University (2007b), ‘Facts and Figures’, accessed 18 April 2007 at www.uni.oresund.org/graphics/Oeresundsuniversitet/presentationer/Presentatio nOresundUniversityEnglish.ppt#277,2, Bild 2.
35. SetSquared Partnership (2007a), accessed 26 March 2007 at www.setsquaredpartnership. co.uk/about-us/.
36. SetSquared Partnership (2007b), accessed 4 February 2007 at www.setsquaredpartnership. co.uk/companies/.
37. Wharton/INSEAD Alliance (2007a), www.wharton.upenn.edu/campus/alliance/.
38. Wharton/INSEAD Alliance (2007b), ‘Frequently Asked Questions’, accessed 4 March 2007 at www.wharton.upenn.edu/campus/alliance/faqs.cfm.
39. White Rose University Consortium (2007a), ‘The White Rose Consortium Structure’, accessed 22 March 2007 at www.whiterose.ac.uk/NewsDetail.aspx?id =60 Structure.
40. White Rose University Consortium (2007b), ‘The White Rose University Consortium History’, accessed 4 April 2007 at www.whiterose.ac.uk/AboutDetail.aspx?id=2.