Climate justice and the international regime

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 462-474

  Okereke, Chukwumerije ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGY;

CLIMATE JUSTICES; CURRENT REGIMES; ETHICAL STANDARDS; GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE; GLOBAL INEQUALITIES; INTERNATIONAL REGIMES; POLICY DEBATES; POWER POLITICS;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES;

EID: 78649900022     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.52     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Grubb M. Seeking fair weather? ethics and the international debate on climate change. Int Aff 1995, 71:462-496.
2. Okereke C, Schroeder H. How can the objectives of justice, development and climate change mitigation be reconciled in the treatment of developing countries in a post-Kyoto settlement? Clim Dev 2009, 1:10-15.
3. Heyward M. Equity and international climate change negotiations: a matter of perspective. Clim Policy 2007, 7:518-534.
4. Gardiner SM. Ethics and global climate change. Ethics 2004, 114:555-600.
5. Grasso M. A normative ethical framework in climate change. Clim Change 2007, 81:223-246.
6. Muller B. Equity in Climate Change: The Great Divide. Oxford Institute of Energy Studies EV31, 2002.
7. Muylaert de Araujo MS, Pires de Campos C, Pinguelli RL. GHG historical contribution by sectors: sustainable development and equity. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2005, 11:988-997.
8. Friman M, Linner B. Technology obscuring equity: historical responsibility in UNFCCC negotiations. Clim Policy 2008, 8:339-354.
9. Snidal D. Coordination versus prisoners dilemma: implications for international cooperation and regimes. Am Polit Sci Rev 1985, 79:923-942.
10. Grieco J. Anarchy and the limits of co-operation; A realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. Int Organ 1988, 42:485-507.
11. Krasner S. Structural causes and regime consequences; regimes as intervening variables. In: Stephen K, ed. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1983.
12. Keohane RO. After Hegemony Co-operation and Discord in the World Political Economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1984.
13. Vogler J. Taking institutions seriously: how regimes can be relevant tomultilevel environmental governance. Global Environ Politics 2003, 3:25-39.
14. Hasenclever A, Andreas P, Volker R. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
15. Young O. International Co-operation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment. Ithaca, New York: Cornwell University Press, 1989.
16. Franceschet A. Moral principles and political institutions: perspectives on ethics and international affairs. Millennium J Int Studies 2002, 31:347-357.
17. Dunne T. New thinking on international society. Brit J Politics Int Relations 2001, 3:223-244.
18. Dobson A. Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Dimensions of Social Justice. Oxford: University Press; 1998.
19. Sprinz D, Vaahtoranta T. The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy. Int Organ 1994, 8:77-105.
20. Susskind L, Ozawa C. Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
21. Ridely M, Low B. Can selfishness save the environment? Human Ecol Rev 1993, 1:1-13.
22. Ruggie J. Multilateralism: the anatomy of an institution. In: Ruggie JG, ed. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. NewYork: Columbia University Press; 1993, 3-47.
23. Wendt A. Constructing international politics. Int Secur 1995, 20:71-81.
24. Franck T. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
25. Hurrell A. Global inequality and international institutions. Metaphilosophy 2001, 32:34-57.
26. Wendt A. The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. Int Organ 1987, 41:335-370.
27. Wapner P. Governance in global civil society. In: Young O (ed.), Global Governance: Drawing Insight from Environmental Experience. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press; 1997.
28. Wolfer A. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Relations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1962, (originally written 1949).
29. Dyer, H. Normative theory and international relations. In: Dyer HC, Mangasarian L (eds). The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art. London: Macmillan; 1989.
30. Walzer M. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books; 1977.
31. Walker G, Bulkeley H. Geographies of environmental justice. Geoforum 2006, 37:655-659.
32. Grubb M, Sebenius J, Magalhaes A, Subak IM. Sharing the burden. In: Mintzer I (ed.) Confronting Climate Change: Risks, Implications and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
33. Shue H. The unavoidability of justice. In: Hurrell A, Kingsbury B (eds). International Politics of the Environment: Actors Interests and Institutions. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1992.
34. Athanasiou T, Baer P. Dead Heat: Global Justice and Global Warming. New York: Seven Stories Press; 2002.
35. Roberts JT, Parks B. Climate of Injustice: Global Inequity, North-South Politics and Climate Policy. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2007.
36. Price R. Moral limit and possibility in world politics. Int Organ 2008, 62:191-220.
37. Toth FL (ed.) Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. London: Earthscan; 1999.
38. Ikeme J. Equity, environmental justice and sustainability: incomplete approaches in climate change politics. Glob Environ Change 2003, 13:195-206.
39. Gupta S, Bhandari PM. An effective allocation criterion for CO2 emission. Energy Policy 1999, 27:727-736.
40. Parks B, Roberts JT. Environmental and ecological justice. In: Betsill MM, Hochstetler K and Stevis D eds. International Environmental Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
41. Shue H. Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law Policy, 1993, 15:39-59.
42. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers and Technical Summary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
43. Adger WN, Paavola J, Huq S,Mace MJ, eds. Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006.
44. Okereke C, Mann P, Osbahr H, Muller B, Ebeling J. Assessment of Key Negotiating Issues at Nairobi Climate COP/MOP and What it Means for the Future of the Climate Regime. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Working Paper, 2007, 106.
45. Breyman S. Knowledge as power: ecology movements and global environmental problems. In: Lipschutz RD, Conca K, eds. The State and Social Power in Global Environmental Politics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993.
46. Hawkins A. Contested ground: international environmentalism and global climate change. In: Lipschutz RD, Conca K, eds. The State and Social Power in Global Environmental Politics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993.
47. Sachs W, Santarius T, eds. Fair Future: Resource conflicts, security and global justice. London: Zed Books; 2005.
48. Hyder TO. Looking back to see forward. In: Mintzer I, Leonard JA, eds. Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Conventio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
49. Dasgupta C. The climate change negotiations. In: Mintzer I, Leonard JA, eds. Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
50. Biermann F, Bauer S. A World Environment Organization: Solution or Threat for Effective International Environmental Governance? Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing; 2005.
51. Ringius L, Torvanger A, Underdal A. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy, international environmental agreements. Politics Law Econ 2002, 2:1-22.
52. Paterson M. International justice and global warming. In: Holden B, ed. The Ethical Dimensions of Global Change. London: Macmillan; 1996a.
53. Rowlands IH. International fairness and justice in addressing global climate change. Env Polit, 1997, 6:1-19.
54. Barrett S. "Acceptable" allocations of tradeable carbon emission entitlements in a global warming treaty. Combatting Global Warming: Study on a Global System of Tradeable Carbon Emission Entitlements. Geneva: UNCTAD; 1992, 85-113.
55. Paavola J, Adger WN. 2006 fair adaptation to climate change. Ecol Econ 2006, 56:594-609.
56. Caney S. Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden J int Law, 2005, 18:747-775.
57. Page EA. Fairness on the day after tomorrow: justice, reciprocity and global climate change. Polit Stud 2007, 55:225-242.
58. Campbell D. Justice and international order: the case of Bosnia and Kosov. In: Jean-Marc C, Daniel W, eds. Ethics and International Affairs: Extent and Limits. New York: United Nations University Press; 2001.
59. Okereke C, Dooley K. Principles of justice in proposals and approaches to avoided deforestation: towards a post-Kyoto agreement. Glob Environ Change 20:82-95.
60. Ringius L, Torvanger A, Underdal A. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy, Int Environ Agreements: Politics Law Econ 2002, 2:1-22.
61. Okereke C. Global Justice andNeoliberal Environmental Governance: Ethics, Sustainable Development and International Co-operation. London: Routledge; 2008.
62. PatersonM. Global Warming and Global Politics. London: Routledge; 1996b.
63. Olmstead SM, Stavins RN. An international policy architecture for the post-Kyoto era. Am Econ Rev 2006, 96:35-38.
64. Najam A, Huq S, Sokona Y. Climate negotiations beyond Kyoto: developing countries concerns and interests. Clim Policy 2003, 3:221-231.
65. Paavola J, Adger WN. Justice and Adaptation to Climate Change. Tyndall centre Working paper No. 23, 2002.
66. Ashton J, Wang X. Equity and climate change: in principle and practice. Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort against Climate Change International Climate Efforts Beyond 2012. Report of the Climate Dialogue at Pocantico. Virginia: Pew Centre; 2002.
67. Bachram H. Climate Fraud and carbon colonialism: the new trade in Greenhouse gases. Capitalism Nat Socialism 2005, 15:5-20.
68. McCarthy J, Prudham S. Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum 2004, 35:275-283.
69. Okereke C. Global environmental sustainability: intragenerational equity and conceptions of justice in multilateral environmental regimes. Geoforum 2006, 37:725-738.
70. Grubb M, Sebenius J, Magalhaes A. Who Bears the Burden? Equity and Allocation in Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Abatement. Paper for SEI project for UNCED, June, 1991.
71. Hayes P. North-South Transfer, in P Hayes and K Smith (eds), The Global Greenhouse Regime: Who Pays? London: Earthscan, 1993.
72. Grubb M. The Greenhouse Effect: Negotiating Targets. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs; 1989.
73. Rajamani L. The principle of common but differentiated responsibility and the balance of commitments under the climate regime. Rev Eur Commun Int Environ Law 2000, 9:120-130.
74. Binaz S. Remarks on common but differentiated responsibility. ASIL Proc 2002, 96:359-361.
75. Borione D, Ripert J. Exercising common but differentiated responsibility. In: Mintzer I, Leonard JA, eds. Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
76. Harris PG. Common but differentiated responsibility: the Kyoto protocol and United States Policy. N.Y.U. Environ Law J 1999, 27:41-42.
77. Stone C. Common and differentiated responsibility principle in international law. Am J Int Law 2002, 98:276-301.
78. Matusi Y. Some aspects of the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities. Int Environ Agreements: Politics Law Econ 2002, 2:151-171.
79. Okereke C. Equity norms in global environmental governance. Global Environ Politics 2008, 8:25-50.
80. Shukla PR. Justice, equity and efficiency in climate change: a developing country perspective. In: Toth FL, ed. Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. London: Earthscan; 1999.
81. Den Elzen MGJ, Schaffer M, Lucas PL. Differentiating future commitments on the basis of countries relative historical responsibility for climate change: uncertainties in the Brazil proposal in the context of a policy implementation. Clim Change 2005, 71:277-301.
82. Oliva MJ. Climate Change, Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights, prepared for the seminar Trade and Climate Change, Copenhagen June 18-20, 2008.Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable.
83. Liverman D, Boyd E. The CDM. Ethics and development. In: Olsen KH, Fenhann J, eds. A Reformed CDM-Including New Mechanisms for Sustainable Development: Roskilde Denmark UNEP Risø Centre; 2008.
84. Boyd E, Hultman NE, Roberts TJ, Corbera, E, Ebeling J, Liverman, DM, et al. The Clean DevelopmentMechanism: An Assessment of Current Practice and Future Approaches for Policy, Tyndall Centre Working Paper 114, October 2007.
85. Shue H. Avoidable necessity: global warming, international fairness, and alternative energy. In: Shapiro I, DeCew JW, eds. Theory and Practice. New York: New York University Press; 1994.
86. Paterson M. Understanding Global Environmental Politics: Domination, Accumulation and Resistance. Houndmills: Macmillan; 2000.