Combined strategic and tactical negotiation methodology for resolving complex brownfield conflicts

Pesquisa Operacional

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 281-304

  Hipel, Keith W ^a   Hegazy, Tarek ^a   Yousefi, Saied ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Brownfield redevelopment; Infrastructure negotiation; Soft systems thinking

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649898270     PISSN: 01017438     EISSN: 16785142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0101-74382010000200003     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Al-Mutairi, M.S.; Hipel, K.W. & Kamel, M.S. (2008). Fuzzy Preferences in Conflicts. Journal of Systems and Systems Engineering, 17(3), 257-276.
2. Barnett, J. (1995). The Fractured Metropolis-Improving the New City, Restoring the Old City, Reshaping the Region. Harper Collins, New York, USA.
3. Bartsch, C.; Andress, C.; Seitzman, J. & Cooney, D. (1991). New Life for Old Buildings: Confronting Environmental and Economic Barriers to Industrial Reuse. Northeast-Midwest Institute, Washington, USA.
4. Begley, R. (1997). Resurrecting Brownfields. Environmental Science and Technology, 31(5), 226A-230A.
5. Benazon, N. (1995). Soil Remediation: A Practical Overview of Canadian Cleanup Strategies and Commercially Available Technology. Hazardous Materials Management (Fall), 10-26.
6. Ben-Haim, Y. & Hipel, K.W. (2002). The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Information-gap Uncertainty in Preferences. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 126, 319-340.
7. Bourne, L.S. (1995). Reurbanization and Urban Land Development: US Cities in Comparative Context. Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States, Washington.
8. Checkland, P. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology: A 30-year Retrospective and Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. 2nd ed., Wiley, Chichester, Sussex, United Kingdom.
9. Cheung, S. & Suen, H.C.H. (2002). A Multi-attribute Utility Model for Dispute Resolution Strategy Selection. Construction Management and Economics, 20, 557-568.
10. Cohen, S. (2002). Negotiating Skills for Managers. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
11. Darling, T. & Mumpower, J.L. (1990). Modeling Cognitive Influences on the Dynamics of Negotiations. Proc., 23rd Annu. International Conf on Sys. Sci., IEEE Computer Society Press, 22-30.
12. De Sousa, C. (2001). Contaminated Sites: The Canadian Situation in an International Context. Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 131-154.
13. Eden, C. (1988). Cognitive Mapping: A Review. European Journal of Operational Research, 36, 1-13.
14. Fang, L.; Hipel, K.W. & Kilgour, D.M. (1993). Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Wiley, New York, USA.
15. Fang, L.; Hipel, K.W.; Kilgour, M. & Peng, X. (2003a). A Decision Support System for Interactive Decision Making, Part 1: Model Formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, 33(1), 42-55.
16. Fang, L.; Hipel, K.W.; Kilgour, M. & Peng, X. (2003b). A Decision Support System for Interactive Decision Making, Part 2: Analysis and Output Interpretation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, 33(1), 56-66.
17. Fraser, N.M. & Hipel, K.W. (1984). Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions. North Holland, New York, USA.
18. Friend, J.K. & Hickling, A. (2005). Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford, The UK.
19. Glasner, K. (2000). Contract Disputes, the Role of ADR. Dispute Resolution Journal, 55(3), 50-55.
20. Griffiths, L. (1996). Contaminated Property in Canada. Carswell, Thomson Professional Publishing, Toronto, Canada.
21. Hamouda, L.; Kilgour, D.M. & Hipel, K.W. (2004). Strength of Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(5), 449-462.
22. Hamouda, L.; Kilgour, D.M. & Hipel, K.W. (2006). Strength of Preference in Graph Models for Multiple Decision Maker Conflicts. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 179, 314-327.
23. Harmon, K.M.J. (2003). Resolution of Construction Disputes: A Review of Current Methodologies. Leadership Management Engineering, 3(4), 187-201.
24. Henderson, D.A. (1996). Mediation Success: An Empirical Analysis. Ohio St. J. On Dispute Resolution, 105.
25. Hipel, K.W. (Editor). (2009a). Conflict Resolution, Volume 1. Eolss Publishers, Oxford, United Kingdom (ISBN-978-1-84826-120-4 (Adobe e-Book), ISBN-978-1-84826-570-7, Library Edition (Hard Copy).
26. Hipel, K.W. (Editor). (2009b). Conflict Resolution, Volume 2. Eolss Publishers, Oxford, United Kingdom (ISBN-978-1-84826-121-1 (Adobe e-Book), ISBN-978-1-84826-571-4, Library Edition (Hard Copy).
27. Hipel, K.W. & Ben-Haim, Y. (1999). Decision Making in an Uncertain World: Information-gap Modeling in Water Resources Management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, 29(4), 506-517.
28. Hipel, K.W. & Fang, L. (2005). Multiple Participant Decision Making in Societal and Technological Systems. In: Systems and Human Science - For Safety, Security, and Dependability: Selected Papers of the 1st International Symposium [edited by T. Arai, S. Yamamoto and K. Makino], SSR2003, Osaka, Japan, published by Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Chapter 1, 3-31.
29. Hipel, K.W.; Jamshidi, M.M.; Tien, J.M. & White, C.C. (2007). The Future of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Application Domains and Research Methods. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 37(5), 726-743.
30. Hipel, K.W.; Kilgour, D.M.; Fang, L. & Peng, X. (2001). Strategic Support for the Services Industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3), 358-369.
31. Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
32. Inohara, T. & Hipel, K.W. (2008a). Coalition Analysis in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Accepted for publication, Systems Engineering, 11(4), 343-359.
33. Inohara, T. & Hipel, K.W. (2008b). Interrelationships Among Noncooperative and Coalition Stability Concepts. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 17, 1-29.
34. Inohara, T.; Hipel, K.W. & Walker, S. (2007). Conflict Analysis Approaches for Investigating Attitudes and Misperceptions in the War of 1812. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 16(2), 1-21.
35. Inohara, T.; Yousefi, S. & Hipel, K.W. (2008). Propositions on Interrelationships among Attitude-based Stability Concepts. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, held in Singapore, October 12-15, 2502-2507.
36. Ji, S.; Liang, Y.; Xiao, X.; Li, J. & Tian, Q. (2007). An Attitude-adaptation Negotiation Strategy in Electronic Market Environments. Eight ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, IEEE Computer Society, 125-130.
37. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. Keeney, R.L. & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York, USA.
39. Kilgour, D.M. (2006). Introduction to Game Theory, MA 235 Course Package. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, Canada.
40. Kilgour, D.M.; Hipel, K.W.; Fang, L. & Peng, X. (2001). Coalition Analysis in Group Decision and Support. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(2), 159-175.
41. Li, K.W.; Hipel, K.W.; Kilgour, D.M. & Fang, L. (2004a). Preference Uncertainty in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 34(4), 507-520.
42. Li, K.W.; Kilgour, D.M. & Hipel, K.W. (2004b). Status Quo Analysis of the Flathead River Conflict. Water Resources Research, 40(5), W05S03, doi:10.1029/2003WR002596 (9 pages).
43. Li, K.W.; Kilgour, D.M. & Hipel, K.W. (2005). Status Quo Analysis in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56, 699-707.
44. Loosemore, M. (1999). Bargaining Tactics in Construction Disputes. Construction Management and Economics, 17, 177-188.
45. Mix, D. (1997). ADR in the Construction Industry: Continuing the Development of a More Efficient Dispute Resolution Mechanism. 12 Ohio St. J. On Dispute Resolution, 463.
46. Nash, J.F. (1950). Equilibrium Points in n-Person Games. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 36, 48-49.
47. Nash, J.F. (1951). Noncooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286-295.
48. National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE) (2003). Cleaning up the Past, Building the Future: A National Brownfield Redevelopment Strategy for Canada. ISBN 1-894737-05-9, Ottawa, Canada.
49. Obeidi, A.; Hipel, K.W. & Kilgour, D.M. (2005). The Role of Emotions in Envisioning Outcomes in Conflict Analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14, 481-500.
50. Obeidi, A.; Kilgour, D.M. & Hipel, K.W. (2009). Perceptual Stability Analysis of a Graph Model System. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, Humans and Systems, 39(5), 993-1006.
51. Page, W. (1997). Contaminated Sites and Environmental Cleanup: International Approaches to Presentation, Remediation, and Reuse. Academic Press, San Diego, USA.
52. Pena-Mora, F. & Wang, C.Y. (1998). Computer-Supported Collaborative Negotiation Methodology. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 12(2), 64-81.
53. Pinnell, S. (1999). Partnering and the Management of Construction Disputes. Dispute Resolution Journal, 54(1), 16-22.
54. PolicyLink (2008). Equitable Development Toolkit. Building Regional Equity. , accessed on January 05, 2009.
55. Raiffa, H.; Richardson, J. & Metcalfe, D. (2002). Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.
56. Richter, I.E. (2000). The Project Neutral: Neutralizing Risk, Maintaining Relationships & Watching the Bottom Line. Construction Business Review, 8(2), 52-54.
57. Rosenhead, J. & Mingers, J. (Ed.) (2001). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, xviii + 366 pages.
58. US Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2007). Annual Report. , accessed on March 23, 2008.
59. Von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. 1st ed. Wiley, New York, USA.
60. Walker, S.; Hipel, K.W. & Inohara, T. (2009). Strategic Decision Making for Improved Environmental Security: Coalitions and Attitudes. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 18(4), 461-476.
61. Xu, H.; Hipel, K.W. & Kilgour, D.M. (2009a). Multiple Levels of Preference in Interactive Strategic Decisions. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 57, 3300-3313.
62. Xu, H.; Hipel, K.W. & Kilgour, D.M. (2009b). Matrix Representation of Solution Concepts in Multiple Decision Maker Graph Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, 39(1), 96-108.
63. Yousefi, S.; Hipel, K.W. & Hegazy, T. (2008). Construction Negotiations: Does Attitude Matter? Proceedings of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, the 2008 Annual Conference, held in Quebec City, Canada, June 10-13, 2008, pp. 289-297.
64. Yousefi, S. Hipel, K.W. & Hegazy, T. (2010). Considering Attitudes in Strategic Negotiation over Brownfield Disputes. ASCE Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, to appear.
65. Zuhair, S.M.M.; Taylor, D.B. & Kramer, R.A. (1992). Choice of Utility Function Form: Its Effect on Classification of Risk Preferences and the Prediction of Farmer Decisions. Agricultural Economics, 6, 333-344.