Multiple levels of preference in interactive strategic decisions

Discrete Applied Mathematics

Volumn 157, Issue 15, 2009, Pages 3300-3313

  Xu, Haiyan ^a,b   Hipel, Keith W ^b   Marc Kilgour, D ^c  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Degree of preference; Graph model for conflict resolution; Multiple decision makers; Multiple level hierarchies of preference; Stability

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT SITUATION; DECISION MAKERS; DEGREE OF PREFERENCE; FIXED PARAMETERS; GRAPH MODEL; GRAPH MODEL FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION; LEVEL 2; LEVEL-1; MULTI OBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING; MULTIPLE DECISION MAKERS; MULTIPLE LEVELS; MULTIPLE-LEVEL HIERARCHIES OF PREFERENCE; NEW SOLUTIONS; PREFERENCE RANKING; SEQUENTIAL STABILITY; STRATEGIC DECISIONS; THREE-LEVEL;

DECISION THEORY; SYSTEM STABILITY;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 69249209726     PISSN: 0166218X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2009.06.032     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Fang L., Hipel K.W., and Kilgour D.M. Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (1993), Wiley, New York, USA
2. Fang L., Hipel K.W., Kilgour D.M., and Peng X. A decision support system for interactive decision making, Part 1: Model formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C 33 1 (2003) 42-55
3. Fang L., Hipel K.W., Kilgour D.M., and Peng X. A decision support system for interactive decision making, Part 2: Analysis and output interpretation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C 33 1 (2003) 56-66
4. Fraser N.M., and Hipel K.W. Solving complex conflicts. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 9 (1979) 805-817
5. Hamouda L., Kilgour D.M., and Hipel K.W. Strength of preference in the graph model for conflict resolution. Group Decision and Negotiation 13 (2004) 449-462
6. Hamouda L., Kilgour D.M., and Hipel K.W. Strength of preference in graph models for multiple-decision-maker conflicts. Applied Mathematics and Computation 179 (2006) 314-327
7. Hipel K.W. Conflict resolution: Theme overview paper in conflict resolution. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) (2002), EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK
8. Howard N. Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior (1971), MIT press, Cambridge, MA
9. Kilgour D.M., Hipel K.W., and Fang L. The graph model for conflicts. Automatica 23 (1987) 41-55
10. Li K.W., Kilgour D.M., and Hipel K.W. Status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56 (2005) 699-707
11. Mas-Colell A., Whinston M., and Green J. Microeconomic Theory (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
12. Nash J.F. Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Nat. Academy Sci., New York, NY 36 (1950) 48-49
13. Nash J.F. Noncooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54 (1951) 286-295
14. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
15. Saaty T.L. Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 32 (1986) 841-855
16. Saaty T.L., and Alexander J.M. Conflict Resolution: The Analytic Hierarchy Approach (1989), Praeger Publishers, New York
17. Wang Y., Yang J., and Xu D. A preference aggregation method through the estimation of utility intervals. Computers and Operations Research 32 (2005) 2027-2049
18. Zeng D.Z., Fang L., Hipel K.W., and Kilgour D.M. Generalized metarationalities in the graph model for conflict resolution. Discrete Applied Mathematics 154 (2006) 2430-2443