More spiritual than religious: Changes in the religious field require new approaches

Lived Religion: Conceptual, Empirical and Practical-Theological Approaches

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 53-67

  Streib, Heinz ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649877906     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004163775.i-404     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1971). Genesis and Structure of the Religious Field. Comparative Social Research, 13 (1991), 1-44.
3. Bourdieu, P.. (1987). Legitimation and Structured Interest in Weber's Sociology of Religion. In: S. Lash & S. Whimster (Eds.), Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity (pp. 119-136). London: Allen & Unwin.
4. Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1985). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor-Inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional Manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources 1992.
5. Daiber, K.-F. (2002). Mysticism: Troeltsch's Third Type of Religious Collectivities. In: Social Compass, 49, 329-341.
6. Dinter, A., Heimbrock, H.-G., & Söderblom, K. (Eds.) (2007). Einführung in die Empirische Theologie. Göttingen: Vandehoeck&Rupprecht.
7. Gebhardt, W. (2002). Signaturen der religiösen Gegenwartskultur. die Verszenung der Kirchen und die Eventisierung der Religion. In: W. Isenberg (Ed.), Orte für den Glauben. Die zukünftige Gestalt des Christentums in der säkularen Welt (pp. 9-23). Bensberg.
8. Greenwald, D. F. & Harder, D. W. (2003). The Dimensions of Spirituality. In: Psychological Reports, 92, 975-980.
9. Hood, R. W. (1975). The Construction and Preliminary Validation of a Measure of Reported Mystical Experience. In: Journal for the Scientifi c Study of Religion, 14, 29-41.
10. Hood, R. W.. (2006). The Common Core Thesis in the Study of Mysticism. In: P. McNamara (Ed.), Where God and Science Meet: How Brain and Evolutionary Studies Alter our Understanding of Religion, Vol. 3. Westport, Conn: Praeger Publishers.
11. Houtman, D. & Aupers, S. (2007). The Spiritual Turn and the Decline of Tradition: The Spread of Post-Christian Spirituality in 14 Western Countries, 1981-2000. In: Journal for the Scientifi c Study of Religion, 46, 305-320.
12. Keller, B., Csöff, R.-M., & Streib, H. (2007). The Bielefeld-Based Cross-Cultural Research on Deconversion: Qualitative Results (Final Report, Vol. II) Contributions to Biographical Research in Religion, No. 4, Bielefeld: University of Bielefeld, Evangelische Theologie.[online at: http://rf.isert-network.com/docs_en/FinalReport-Vol.2-Qualitative.pdf ].
13. Keller, B., Csöff, R.-M., & Streib, H. (forthcoming). Who Says 'I am more Spiritual than Religious'? 'More Spiritual' Self-Identifi cations and the Semantics of Spirituality in Qualitative Analysis.
14. Knoblauch, H. (2003). Europe and Invisible Religion. In: Social Compass, 50, 267-274.
15. Luckmann, T. (1967). The Invisible Religion. The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. New York: Macmillan.
16. Marler, P. L. & Hadaway, C. K. (2002). 'Being Religious' or 'Being Spiritual' in America: A Zero-Sum Proposition? In: Journal for the Scientifi c Study of Religion, 41, 289-300.
17. Ryff, C. D. & Singer, B. H. (1996). Psychological Well-Being: Meaning, Measurement, and Implications for Psychotherapy Research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65, 14-23.
18. Schleiermacher, F. (1799). On Religion. Speeches to its Cultured Despisers. translated and edited by Richard Crouter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.
19. Smith, W. C. (1963). The Meaning and End of Religion. Minneapolis: Fortress Press 1991.
20. Smith, W. C.. (1979). Faith and Belief. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21. Streib, H. (1998). Alltagsreligion oder: Wie religiös ist der Alltag? Zur lebensweltlichen Verortung von Religion in praktisch-theologischem Interesse. In: International Journal for Practical Theology, 2, 23-51.
22. Smith, W. C.. (2007a). The Bielefeld-Based Cross-Cultural Research on Deconversion: Quantitative Results (Final Report, Vol. I) Contributions to Biographical Research in Religion, No. 3, Bielefeld: University of Bielefeld, Evangelische Theologie.[online at: http://rf.isertnetwork.com/docs_en/FinalReport-Vol.1-Quantitative.pdf ].
23. Smith, W. C.. (2007b). Religious Praxis: De-Institutionalized? Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. In: H. Streib (Ed.), Religion inside and outside Traditional Institutions (pp. 147-174). Leiden: Brill.
24. Thomas, G. (2001). Implizite Religion. Theoriegeschichtliche und theoretische Untersuchungen zum Problem ihrer Identifi kation. Würzburg: Ergon.
25. Troeltsch, E. (1911). Das stoisch-christliche Naturrecht und das moderne profane Naturrecht. In: Verhandlungen des Ersten Deutschen Soziologentages (pp. 166-214). Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
26. Troeltsch, E. (1912). The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, Vol. 2. London; New York: George Allen & Unwin; MacMillan 1956.
27. Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., Cole, B., Rye, M. S., Butter, E. M., Belavich, T. G. et al. (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. In: Journal for the Scientifi c Study of Religion, 36, 549-564.