Rates of new or missed colorectal cancer after barium enema and their risk factors: A population-based study

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 103, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 3142-3148

  Toma, Jonathan ^a   Paszat, Lawrence F ^b,c   Gunraj, Nadia ^c   Rabeneck, Linda ^a,b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

^d DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARIUM; BARIUM SULFATE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; ENEMA;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARIUM ENEMA; CANADA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA EXTRACTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIVERTICULOSIS; DOUBLE CONTRAST BARIUM ENEMA; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PELVIS SURGERY; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DETERMINATION; COLORECTAL TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; REGISTER; RISK FACTOR;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BARIUM SULFATE; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; ENEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 58149384450     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02199.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Canadian Cancer Society National Cancer Institute of Canada : Canadian Cancer Statistics 2007, Toronto, Canada, 2007.
2. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2007. Atlanta GA : American Cancer Society, 2007.
3. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002 137 : 129 31.
4. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008 58 : 1 31.
5. Cooper GS, Koroukian SM. Geographic variation among Medicare beneficiaries in the use of colorectal carcinoma screening procedures. Am J Gastroenterol 2004 99 : 1544 50.
6. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF. A population-based estimate of the extent of colorectal cancer screening in Ontario. Am J Gastroenterol 2004 99 : 1141 4.
7. Klabunde CN, Jones E, Brown ML, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with double-contrast barium enema: A national survey of diagnostic radiologists. Am J Roentgenol 2002 179 : 1419 27.
8. Strom E, Larsen JL. Colon cancer at barium enema examination and colonoscopy: A study from the county of Hordaland, Norway. Radiology 1999 211 : 211 4.
9. Culpan DG, Mitchell AJ, Hughes S, et al. Double contrast barium enema sensitivity: A comparison of studies by radiographers and radiologists. Clin Radiol 2002 57 : 604 7.
10. Tawn DJ, Squire CJ, Mohammed MA, et al. for the Royal College of Radiologists Clinical Radiology Audit Sub-Committee National audit of the sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema for colorectal carcinoma, using control charts. Clin Radiol 2005 60 : 558 64.
11. Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, et al. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 1997 112 : 17 23.
12. Department of Health and Human Services, The international classification of diseases, 9th rev., clinical modification: ICD-9-CM (3rd ed.), Diseases: tabular list Volume 1. Washington, DC : Government Printing Office, 1989 March.
13. Department of Health and Human Services, The international classification of diseases, 10th rev., clinical modification: ICD-10-CM (Draft ed.), Diseases: tabular list Volume 1. Washington, DC : Government Printing Office, 2003 June.
14. Robles SC, Marrett LD, Clarke EA, et al. An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registration. J Clin Epidemiol 1988 41 : 495 501.
15. Chen TH, Yen MF, Lai MS, et al. Evaluation of a selective screening for colorectal carcinoma: The Taiwan Multicenter Cancer Screening (TAMCAS) project. Cancer 1999 86 : 1116 28.
16. Gupta S, Roos LL, Walld R, et al. Delivering equitable care: Comparing preventive services in Manitoba. Am J Public Health 2003 93 : 2086 92.
17. Wilkins R. Use of postal codes and addresses in the analysis of health data. Health Rep 1993 5 : 157 77.
18. Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: Validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 1992 82 : 703 10.
19. Singh SM, Paszat LF, Li C, et al. Association of socioeconomic status and receipt of colorectal cancer investigations: A population-based retrospective cohort study. CMAJ 2004 171 : 461 5.
20. Tan KY, Seow-Choen F, Ng C, et al. Which colorectal cancers are missed by double contrast barium enema? Tech Coloproctol 2004 8 : 169 72.
21. Baker SR, Alterman DD. False-negative barium enema in patients with sigmoid cancer and coexistent diverticula. Gastrointest Radiol 1985 10 : 171 3.
22. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: A population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007 132 : 96 102.
23. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005 237 : 893 904.