Musculoskeletal-see-through mirror: Computational modeling and algorithm for whole-body muscle activity visualization in real time

Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology

Volumn 103, Issue 2-3, 2010, Pages 310-317

  Murai, Akihiko ^a   Kurosaki, Kosuke ^a   Yamane, Katsu ^b   Nakamura, Yoshihiko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b DISNEY RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Electromyography (EMG); Motion capture; Muscle dynamics model; Musculoskeletal model; Real time visualization

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KINESIOTHERAPY; METHODOLOGY; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCLE TONE; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EXERCISE MOVEMENT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCLE TONUS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; OPTICAL DEVICES;

EID: 78649853713     PISSN: 00796107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aist Japanese body dimension data 1997-98 http://riodb.ibase.aist.go.jp/dhbodydb/97-98/index.html.en.
2. Bhargava L., Pandy M., Anderson F. A phenomenological model for estimating metabolic energy consumption in muscle contraction. Journal of Biomechanics 2004, 37:81-88.
3. Buchanan T., Delp S., Solbeck J. Muscular resistance to varus and valgus loads at the elbow. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1998, 120:634-639.
4. Caicoya A., Illert M., Jänike R. Monosynaptic Ia pathways at the cat shoulder. The Journal of Physiology 1999, 518:825-841.
5. Delp S., Loan J. A computational framework for simulating and analyzing human and animal movement. IEEE Computing in Science and Engineering 2000, 2:46-55.
6. Delp S., Anderson F., Arnold A., Loan P., Habib A., John C., Guendelman E., Thelen D. Opensim: Open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2007, 54:1940-1950.
7. Frit N., Illert M., de la Motte S., Reeh P., Saggau P. Pattern of monosynaptic Ia connections in the cat forelimb. The Journal of Physiology 1989, 419:321-351.
8. Engberg I., Lundberg A. An electromyographic analysis of muscular activity in the hindlimb of the cat during unrestrained locomotion. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 1969, 75:614-630.
9. Forster E., Simon U., Augat P., Claes L. Extension of a state-of-the-art optimization criterion to predict co-contraction. Journal of Biomechanics 2004, 37:577-581.
10. Hill A. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 1938, 126:136-195.
11. Harris C., Wolpert D. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 1998, 394:780-784.
12. Illert M. Monosynaptic Ia pathways and motor behaviour of the cat distal forelimb. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 1996, 56:423-434.
13. Knott M., Voss D. Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation: Patterns and Techniques 1968, Harper & Row. 2nd ed.
14. Lloyd D., Besier T. An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. Journal of Biomechanics 2003, 36:765-776.
15. Murai A., Kurosaki K., Yamane K., Nakamura Y. Computationally fast estimation of muscle tension for realtime bio-feedback. Proceedings of the 31th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference 2009, 6546-6549.
16. Merletti R. Standards for reporting EMG data. Journal of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology 1999, 9.
17. Nihon-Kohden Web-7000 http://www.nihonkohden.com.
18. Nakamura Y., Hanafusa H. Inverse kinematic solutions with singularity robustness for robot manipulator control. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 1986, 108:163-171.
19. Nakamura Y., Yamane K., Murai A. Macroscopic modeling and identification of the human neuromuscular network. Proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference 2006, 99-105.
20. Nakamura Y., Yamane K., Fujita Y., Suzuki I. Somatosensory computation for man-machine interface from motion-capture data and musculoskeletal human model. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 2005, 21:58-66.
21. Nussbaum M., Chaffin D. Lumbar muscle force estimation using a subject-invariant 5-parameter EMG-based model. Journal of Biomechanics 1998, 31:667-672.
22. Orin D., McGhee R., Vukobratovic M., Hartoch G. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of open-chain linkages utilizing Newton-Euler methods. Mathematical Biosciences 1979, 43:107-130.
23. Patel C., North W. Randomised controlled trial of yoga and bio-feedback in management of hypertension. Lancet 1975, 19:93-95.
24. Park S., Hodgins J. Data-driven modeling of skin and muscle deformation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 2008, 27:3.
25. Rasmussen J., Damsgaard M., Voigt M. Muscle recruitment by the min/max criterion-a comparative numerical study. Journal of Biomechanics 2001, 34:409-415.
26. Sakurai S., Ohtsuki T. Muscle activity and accuracy of performance of the smash stroke in badminton with reference to skill and practice. Journal of Sports Sciences 2000, 18:901-914.
27. Stroeve S. Impedance characteristics of a neuro-musculoskeletal model of the human arm I: Posture control. Biological Cybernetics 1999, 81:475-494.
28. Teran J., Sifakis E., Blemker S. Creating and simulating skeletal muscle from the visible human data set. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2005, 11:317-328.
29. Yamane K., Fujita Y., Nakamura Y. Estimation of physically and physiologically valid somatosensory information. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2005, 2635-2641.
30. Zajac F. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 1989, 17:359-411.