A collaborative approach for spam detection

Proceedings - 2nd International Conference on Evolving Internet, Internet 2010, 1st International Conference on Access Networks, Services and Technologies, Access 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 92-97

  Sousa, Pedro ^a   Machado, Artur ^a   Rocha, Miguel ^a   Cortez, Paulo ^a   Rio, Miguel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Electronic mail; Filtering; Spam

Indexed keywords

ANTI-SPAM; COLLABORATION; COLLABORATIVE APPROACH; E-MAIL (SPAM); EMAIL SERVICES; END-USERS; FILTERING; NETWORKING SERVICES; RESEARCH EFFORTS; SPAM; SPAM DETECTION; SPAM FILTER;

ELECTRONIC MAIL;

INTERNET;

EID: 78649827756     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/INTERNET.2010.25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group. Email Metrics Program: The Network Operators' Perspective. Report #10 - third and fourth quarter 2008, S. Francisco CA, USA, March 2009.
2. A. Ramachandran and N. Feamster. Understanding the Network-Level Behavior of Spammers. In Proc. of SIG-COMM'06, pp. 291-302, 2006.
3. V. Cheng and C. Li, Personalized Spam Filtering with Semisu-pervised Classifier Ensemble, in IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, 2006.
4. C. Kanich et al., Spamalytics: An Empirical Analysis of Spam Marketing Conversion, in Computer and Communications Security Conference (CCS08). ACM, pp. 27-31, 2008.
5. J. Mendez, I. Cid, D. Glez-Pena, M. Rocha, and F. Fdez-Riverola, A Comparative Impact Study of Attribute Selection Techniques on Naive Bayes Spam Filters, in 8th Industrial Conference on Data Mining, LNAI 5077, pp. 213-227, 2008.
6. Z. Zhong et al., ALPACAS:A Largescale Privacy-Aware Collaborative Antispam System, Proc. INFOCOM, pp. 556-564, 2008.
7. M. Chang, W. Yih, and C. Meek, Partitioned Logistic Regression for Spam Filtering, in 14th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 97-105, 2008.
8. A. Gray and M. Haahr, Personalised, Collaborative Spam Filtering, in 1st Conf. on E-Mail and Anti-Spam CEAS, 2004.
9. B. Nelson et al., Exploiting Machine Learning to Subvert Your Spam Filter, in 1st Usenix Workshop on Large-Scale Exploits and Emergent Threats. ACM Press, pp. 1-9, 2008.
10. E. Blanzieri and A. Bryl. A survey of learning-based techniques of email spam filtering. Artificial Intelligence Review, 29(1):63-92, 2008.
11. R. Grossman, M. Hornick, and G. Meyer, Data Mining Standards Initiatives, Communications of ACM, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 59-61, 2002.
12. A. Garg, R. Battiti, and R. Cascella, May I borrow your filter? Exchanging filters to combat spam in a community, in 20th Int. Conf. on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, Vol. 2, pp.489-493, 2006.
13. H. Kim et al., Preventing session table explosion in packet inspection computers, IEEE Trans. on Computers, pp. 238-240, 2005.
14. H. Yu, M. Kaminsky, P. Gibbons, and A. Flaxman, Sybil-guard: Defending against sybil attacks via social networks, IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking (TON), vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 576-589, 2008.
15. V. Metsis, I. Androutsopoulos, and G. Paliouras, Spam Filtering with Naive Bayes Which Naive Bayes?, in Third Conf. on Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS), pp. 125134, 2006.
16. T. Fawcett, "In vivo spam filtering: A challenge problem for KDD, SIGKDD Explorations, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 140148, 2003.
17. T. Fawcett, An introduction to ROC analysis, Pattern recognition letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861874, 2006.