Subjective risk vs. objective risk can lead to different post-cesarean birth decisions based on multiattribute modeling

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 67-78

  Sharma, Poonam S ^a   Eden, Karen B ^a   Guise, Jeanne Marie ^a,b   Jimison, Holly B ^a   Dolan, James G ^c  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process; Childbirth; Decision tree; Risk communication; Shared decision making; VBAC

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILDBIRTH EDUCATION; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYBRID; MATERNAL WELFARE; PERINATAL PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

CESAREAN SECTION; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PROBABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 78649821010     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. J.M. Guise, M. Berlin, M. McDonagh, P. Osteweil, P. Nygren, and M. Helfand Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review Obstet Gynecol 103 2004 420 429
2. J.M. Guise, M.S. McDonagh, J. Hashima, D.F. Kraemer, K.B. Eden, and M. Berlin Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) Evidence report/technology assessment no. 71 2003 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD
3. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery: clinical management guidelines for obstetricians-gynecologists ACOG practice bulletin no. 5 1999 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Washington, DC
4. K.B. Eden, J.N. Hashima, P. Osterweil, P. Nygren, and J.M. Guise Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: a review of the evidence Birth 31 2004 49 60
5. J.H. Chuang, and R.A. Jenders Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section for the women with a previous cesarean section: a decision analysis Proc AMIA Symp 1999 226 230
6. D.D. Mankuta, M.M. Leshno, M.M. Menasche, and M.M. Brezis Vaginal birth after cesarean section: trial of labor or repeat cesarean section? A decision analysis Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 2003 714 719
7. R. Brown Aider priorities influence decision aid usefulness Interfaces 35 8 2005 511 521
8. R. Brown Making decision research useful - not just rewarding Society for Judgement and Decision Making 1 2 2006 1 12
9. T.L. Saaty, and L.G. Vargas Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes Theorem and the Analytic Hierarchy Process Operations Research 46 1998 491 502
10. J.G. Dolan, and S. Frisina Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid for colorectal cancer screening Med Decis Making 22 2002 125 139
11. D. Baker, D. Bridges, and R. Hunter Guidebook to decision-making methods 2001 US Department of Energy Available at http://emi-web.inel.gov/Nissmg/ Guidebook-2002.pdf Accessed September 30, 2009
12. J.G. Dolan, B.J. Isselhardt, and J.D. Cappuccio The analytic hierarchy process in medical decision making: a tutorial Med Decis Making 9 1 1989 40 50
13. K.B. Eden, J.G. Dolan, N.A. Perrin, D. Kocaoglu, N. Anderson, and J. Case Patients were more consistent in randomized trial at prioritizing childbirth preferences using graphic-numeric than verbal formats J Clin Epidemiol 62 2009 415 424
14. K.H. Carter, N.P. Ritchey, F. Castro, L.P. Caccamo, E. Kessler, and B.A. Erickson Analysis of three decision-making methods: a breast cancer patient as a model Med Decis Making 19 1 1999 49 57
15. L.G. Vargas Utility theory and reciprocal pairwise comparisons: the eigenvector method Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 20 6 1986 387 391
16. E. Pare, J.N. Quinones, and G.A. Macones Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes BJOG 113 1 2006 75 85
17. G.C.S. Smith, J.P. Pell, A.D. Cameron, and R. Dobbie Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies JAMA 287 2002 2684 2690
18. M.B. Landon, J.C. Hauth, K.J. Leveno, C.Y. Spong, S. Leindecker, and M.W. Varner Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery N Engl J Med 351 2004 2581 2589
19. Expected value decision making H.C. Sox, M.A. Blatt, M.C. Higgins, K.I. Marton, Medical decision making 1988 Butterworth-Heinemann Boston 147 166
20. A. Chung, A. Macario, Y.Y. El-Sayed, E.T. Riley, B. Duncan, and M.L. Druzin Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean Obstet Gynecol 97 2001 932 941
21. H.A. Llewellyn-Thomas Investigating patients' preferences for different treatment options Can J Nurs Res 29 3 1997 45 64
22. M. Helfand Shared decision making, decision aids, and risk communication Med Decis Making 27 2007 516 521
23. H. Kremer, G. Ironson, N. Schneiderman, and M. Hautzinger "It's My Body": does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict? Med Decis Making 27 2007 522 532
24. L. Fraenkel, and S. McGraw Participation in medical decision making: the patients' perspective Med Decis Making 27 2007 533 538
25. R.B. Deber, N. Kraetschmer, and J. Irvine What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med 156 1996 1414 1420
26. S. Liu, R. Liston, K.S. Joseph, M. Heaman, R. Sauve, and M.S. Kramer Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term CMAJ 176 2007 455 460