Technology and Web-based support

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 44, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2008, Pages 75-82

  Smith, Carol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649802889     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5175/JSWE.2008.773247715     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Arthur, D., et al. (2001). The effect of technology on the caring attributes of an international sample of nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies 38(1), 37-43. (Pubitemid 33660474)
2. Axisa, F., et al. (2005). Flexible technologies and smart clothing for citizen medicine, home healthcare, and disease prevention. IEEE Transactions in Information Technology in Biomedicine 9(3), 325-336. (Pubitemid 41388198)
3. Barlow, J. (2004). Introducing telecare: The international experience. Public Policy and Aging Report 14(1), 10-15.
4. Bass, D. M., et al. (1998). The buffering effect of a computer support network on caregiver strain. Journal of Aging and Health 10(1), 20-43.
5. Beauchamp, N., et al. (2005). Worksite-based Internet multimedia program for family caregivers of persons with dementia. Gerontologist 45(6), 793-801. (Pubitemid 41759785)
6. Berland, G. K., et al. (2001). Health information on the Internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. Journal of the American Medical Association 285(20), 2612-2621. (Pubitemid 32479901)
7. Bowles, K. H, & Baugh, A. C. (2007). Applying research evidence to optimize telehomecare. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 22(1), 5-15.
8. Brennan, P. F., et al. (1995). The effects of a special computer network on caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease. Nursing Research 44(3), 166-172.
9. Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies. (2008). What is CHESS? University of Wisconsin-Madison. https://chess.wisc.edu/chess/projects/about-ch ess.aspx
10. Connors, H., et al. (2007). HITS: Health Information Technology Scholars program. http://www.hits-colab.org
11. Currell, R., et al. (2001).Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Nursing Times 97(35), 35.
12. Czaja, S. J., et al. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging 21(2), 333-352. (Pubitemid 44212031)
13. Czaja, S. J., & Schultz, R. Innovations in technology and aging: Introduction. Generations 30(2), 6-8.
14. Dauz, E., et al. (2004). Installing computers in older adults' homes and teaching them to access a patient education Web site: Asystematic approach. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 22(5), 266-272. (Pubitemid 39456927)
15. Davis Kirsch, S. E., & Lewis, F. M. (2004). Using the World Wide Web in healthrelated intervention research. A review of controlled trials. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 22(1), 8-18. (Pubitemid 41632363)
16. Day, M., et al. (2007). Exploring underutilization of videophones in hospice settings. Telemedicine Journal and E Health 13(1), 25-31. (Pubitemid 46427769)
17. Fox, S. (2006, Oct. 29). Online health search 2006. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project, Pew Internet Project reports, Health. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP-Online-Health-2006.pdf
18. Fox, S. (2007, Oct. 8). E-patients with a disability or chronic disease. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project, Pew Internet Project reports, Health. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/EPatients-Chronic-Conditions- 2007.pdf
19. Fox, S., & Rainie, L. (2004 May). Vital decisions: How Internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project; Pew Internet Project reports: Health; http://www. pewin ternet.org/pdfs/PIP-Vital-Decisions-May2 002.pdf.
20. Freedman, V. A., et al. (2006). Trends in the use of assistive technology and personal care for late-life disability, 1992-2001. Gerontologist 46(1), 124-127. (Pubitemid 43214423)
21. Glasgow, R. E. (2007). eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 32(suppl. 5), S119-S126. (Pubitemid 46656328)
22. Gustafson, D. H., et al. (2002). CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. International Journal of Medical Informatics 65(3), 169-177. (Pubitemid 35286370)
23. Hersh, W. R., et al. (2001a). Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1, 5.
24. Hersh, W. R., et al. (2001b, July). Telemedicine for the Medicare population. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department for Health and Human Services; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Publication No. 01-E012. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid= hstat1.chapter.33002
25. Hersh, W. R., et al. (2006). Diagnosis, access and outcomes: update of a systematic review of telemedicine services. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 12(suppl. 2), S3-S31.
26. Hsu, J., et al. (2005). Use of e-health services between 1999 and 2002: Agrowing digital divide. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 2(2), 164-171. (Pubitemid 40298951)
27. Johnston, B., et al. (2000). Outcomes of the Kaiser Permanente Tele-Home Health Research Project. Archives of Family Medicine 9(1), 40-45. (Pubitemid 30609723)
28. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. (2007). Introducing smart homes. http://www.jrf.org.uk/housingandcare/smarthomes
29. Kaufman, D. R., & Rockoff, M. L. (2006). Increasing access to online information about health: A program for inner-city elders in community-based organizations. Generations 30(2), 55-57. (Pubitemid 44971840)
30. Kelly, K., et al. (2007, Nov. 16-29). Technology and family caregiving: Advantages and challenges for delivering education, training and support. In The Era of Global Aging: Challenges and Opportunities. Paper presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
31. Kinney, J. M., & Kart, C. S. (2006). Not quite a panacea: Technology to facilitate family caregiving for elders with dementia. Test of a monitoring system. Generations 30(2), 64-66. (Pubitemid 44971843)
32. Krishna, S., et al. (2003). Internet-enabled interactive multimedia asthma education program: A randomized trial. Pediatrics 111(3), 503-510. (Pubitemid 36330705)
33. Lehoux, P. (2004). Patients' perspectives on high-tech home care: A qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies. BMC Health Servics Research 4(1), 28.
34. Matthews, J. T. (2006). Existing and emerging healthcare devices for elders to use at home. Novel ways of meeting everyday needs. Generations 30(2), 13-19. (Pubitemid 44971833)
35. Murray, E., et al. (2003). The impact of health information on the Internet on the physician-patient relationship: Patient perceptions. Archives of Internal Medicine 163(14), 1727-1734. (Pubitemid 36898962)
36. Pare, G., et al. (2007). Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: The evidence base. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(3), 269-277. (Pubitemid 46646987)
37. Pollack, M. E. (2006). Autominder: A case study of assistive technology for elders with cognitive impairment. Generations 30(2), 67-68.
38. Rialle, V., et al. (2002). Health "smart" home: Information technology for patients at home. Journal of Telemedicine and E Health 8(4), 395-409. (Pubitemid 36152408)
39. Rooney, E. M., et al. 1997). A model for nurse case-managed home care using televideo. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 45(12), 1523-1528.
40. Schultz, R., et al. (2002, Sept.). Technology-based caregiver intervention research: Current status and future directions [Keynote address]. International Conference on Gerontechnology, Miami, FL: International Society for Gerontechnology, p. 15-47. http://www.gerontechnology.info/Journal/Content/ Volume-2/nr-1/pdf/15-47.pdf
41. Smith, C. E. (2005). Technological home care: Improving caregiving [National Institute of Nursing Research grant]. Kansas City: University of Kansas Medical Center.
42. Smith, C. E., et al. (2002a). Feasibility of in-home telehealth for conducting nursing research. Clinical Nursing Research 11(2), 220-233.
43. Smith, C. E., et al. (2002b). Quality assurance processes for designing patient education Web sites. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 20(5), 191-200. (Pubitemid 44763602)
44. Smith, C. E., et al. (2006). Telehealth services to improve nonadherence: A placebocontrolled study. Telemedicine Journal and E Health 12(3), 289-296. (Pubitemid 43993729)
45. Stefanov, D. H., et al. (2004). The smart house for older persons and persons with physical disabilities: Structure, technology arrangements, and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 12(2), 228-250. (Pubitemid 38765753)
46. Stiehl, W. D., et al. (2006, Nov. 3-6.) The design of the Huggable: A therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In AAAI Fall Symposium on Caring Machines: AI in eldercare. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC.http://web.media.mit.edu/~wdstiehl/Publications/FS205StiehlWDtoAppear.pdf
47. Whitten, P. (2006). Telemedicine: Communication technologies that revolutionize healthcare services. Simple applications now, virtual reality and simulation soon. Generations 30(2), 20-24. (Pubitemid 44971834)
48. Whitten, P., et al. (2000). Results of a metaanalysis of cost-benefit research: Is this a question worth asking? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 6(Suppl. 1), S4-S6.
49. Wright, L. K., et al. (1998). Telecommunication interventions for caregivers of elders with dementia. Advances in Nursing Science 20(3), 76-88. (Pubitemid 128455049)