Interobjectivity: Representations and artefacts in Cultural Psychology

Culture and Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 451-463

  Sammut, Gordon ^a   Daanen, Paul ^b   Sartawi, Mohammad ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALTA   (Malta)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cultural psychology; interobjectivity; object relations; phenomenology; social representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649782877     PISSN: 1354067X     EISSN: 14617056     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X10380158     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams, D.K. (1931). A restatement of the problem of learning. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 150-178.
2. Asch, S.E. (1987). Social psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1952).
3. Brown, J.F. (1929). The methods of Kurt Lewin in the psychology of action and affection. Psychological Review, 36, 200-221.
4. Chryssides, A., Dashtipour, P., Keshet, S., Righi, C., Sammut, G., & Sartawi, M. (2009). We dona't share! The social representation approach, enactivism and the fundamental incompatibilities between the two. Culture & Psychology, 15, 83-95.
5. Coelho Jr, N.E., & Figueiredo, L.C. (2003). Patterns of intersubjectivity in the constitution of subjectivity: Dimensions of otherness. Culture & Psychology, 9, 193-208.
6. Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory & Psychology, 5, 467-481.
7. Daanen, P. (2009). Conscious and non-conscious representation in social representations theory: Social representations theory from the phenomenological point of view. Culture & Psychology, 15, 372-385.
8. Farr, R. (1993). Theory and method in the study of social representations. In G. M. Breakwell, & D. V. Canter (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations (pp. 15-38). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Furnham, A., & Argyle, M. (1998). The psychology of money. London: Routledge.
10. Gibson J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11. Gieryn, T.F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781-795.
12. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Honderich, T. (Ed.) (2005). The Oxford companion to philosophy (New edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol I). London: Macmillan.
15. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. London: Lund Humphries.
16. Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 3, 228-245.
17. Latour, B. (1999). Pandoraa's hope: An essay on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Lewin, K. (1951). Field research in social sciences. New York: Harper & Row.
19. Marková, I. (2003). Constitution of the self: Intersubjectivity and dialogicality. Culture & Psychology, 9, 249-259.
20. Mead, G.H. (1925). The genesis of self and social control. International Journal of Ethics, 35(3), 251-277.
21. Moghaddam, F.M. (2003). Interobjectivity and culture. Culture & Psychology, 9, 221-232.
22. Moghaddam, F.M. (2006). Interobjectivity: The collective roots of individual consciousness and social identity. In T. Postmes, & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 155-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Moghaddam, F.M. (2008). Multiculturalism and intergroup relations: Psychological implications for democracy in global context. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24. Schacter, R. (2008). An ethnography of iconoclash: An investigation into the production, consumption and destruction of street-art in London. Journal of Material Culture, 13(1), 35-61.
25. Soanes, C. (Ed.) (2005). Pocket Oxford English Dictionary (9th edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Star, S.L., & Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translationsa' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeleya's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
27. Taylor, C. (2006). Merleau-Ponty and the epistemic picture. In T. Carman, & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Merleau-Ponty (pp. 26-49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Valsiner, J., & Rosa, A. (Eds.) (2007). The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.