We don't share! the social representation approach, enactivism and the fundamental incompatibilities between the two

Culture and Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 83-95

  Chryssides, Alison ^a   Dashtipour, Parisa ^a   Keshet, Shira ^a   Righi, Celine ^a   Sammut, Gordon ^a   Sartawi, Mohammad ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dialogical epistemology; Enactivism; Social representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 59549098216     PISSN: 1354067X     EISSN: 14617056     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X08096514     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Bauer, M.W., & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm of research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 163-186.
2. Baum, W.M. (2004). Molar and molecular views of choice. Behavioural Processes, 66, 349-359.
3. Doise, W. (1986). Levels of explanation in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Harré, R. (1984). Some reflections on the concept of social representations. Social Research, 51, 927-938.
5. Himmelweit, H.T. (1990). Societal psychology: Implications and scope. In H.T. Himmelweit & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Societal psychology. London: Sage.
6. Jodelet, D. (1991). Madness and social representations (pp. 17-45). Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Jovchelovitch, S. (2006). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. London: Routledge.
8. Marková, I. (1982). Paradigms, thought and language. London: Wiley.
9. Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviourist (C.W. Morris, Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11. Moscovici, S. (1973). Foreword. In C. Herzlich, Health and illness: A social psychological analysis (pp. ix - xiv). London: Academic Press.
12. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R.M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity.
14. Rose, D., Efraim, D., Gervais, M., Joffe, H., Jovchelovitch, S., & Morant, N. (1995). Questioning consensus in social representations theory. Papers on Social Representations, 4, 1-6.
15. Vergheggen, T., & Baerveldt, C. (2007). We don't share! The social representation approach, enactivism and the ground for an intrinsically social psychology. Culture & Psychology, 13, 5-27.
16. Wagner, W. (1993). Can representations explain social behaviour? A discussion of social representations as rational systems. Papers on Social Representations, 2, 236-249.
17. Wagner, W. (1995). Description, explanation and methods in social representation research. Papers on Social Representations, 4, pp. 156-176.
18. Wagner, W. (1998). Social representations and beyond: Brute facts, symbolic coping and domesticated worlds. Culture & Psychology, 4, 297-329.
19. Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Marková, I., & Rose, D. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 95-125.
20. Wagner, W., & Hayes, N. (2005). Everyday discourse and common sense: The theory of social representations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
21. Wagner, W., Mecha, A., & do Rosário Carvlho, M. (2008). Discourse and representation in the construction of witchcraft. In T. Sugiman, K.J. Gergen, W. Wagner, & Y. Yamada (Eds.), Meaning in action: Constructions, narratives and representations (pp. 37-48). New York: Springer.
22. Wetherell, M., & Maybin, J. (2002). The distributed self: A social constructionist perspective. In R. Stevens (Ed.), Understanding the self (pp. 219-279). London: Sage.