Science-policy consultation as boundary spanning: The interaction of science and politics in two us bioregional assessments

Sustainable Forestry: From Monitoring and Modelling to Knowledge Management and Policy Science

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 129-144

  Pregernig, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649765080     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Beck, U. and Bonß, W. (1984) Soziologie und Modernisierung: Zur Ortsbestimmung der Verwendungsforschung. Soziale Welt 35, 381-406.
2. Beck, U. and Bonß, W. (1989) Verwissenschaftlichung ohne Aufklärung? Zum Strukturwandel von Sozialwissenschaft und Praxis. In: Beck, U. and Bonß, W. (eds) Weder Sozialtechnologie noch Aufklärung? Analysen zur Verwendung sozialwissenschaftlichen Wissens. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, pp. 7-45.
3. Cash, D.W. and Clark, W.C. (2001) From Science to Policy: Assessing the Assessment Process. KSG Faculty Research Working Paper 01-045, Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
4. Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N., Eckley, N. and Jäger, J. (2002) Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking Research, Assessment and Decision Making. KSG Faculty Research Working Paper 02-046, Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
5. Clark, W.C., Mitchell, R.B., Cash, D.W. and Alcock, F. (2002) Information as Influence: How Institutions Mediate the Impact of Scientific Assessments on Global Environmental Affairs. KSG Faculty Research Working Paper 02-044, Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
6. Cortner, H.J., Wallace, M.G. and Moote, M.A. (1999) A political context model for bioregional assessments. In: Johnson, K.N., Swanson, F., Herring, M. and Greene, S. (eds) Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 71-82.
7. Dunn, W.N. (1993) Policy reforms as arguments. In: Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina, pp. 254-290.
8. Engels, A. (2002) European Forum of Integrated Environmental Assessment: evaluation of four science-policy interface workshops. Mimeo, Amsterdam.
9. Erman, D.C. (ed.) (1996) Status of the Sierra Nevada: The Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, 4 vols. Centre for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, California.
10. Erman, D.C. (1999) Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: case study. In: Johnson, K.N., Swanson, F., Herring, M. and Greene, S. (eds) Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 304-320.
11. Farrell, A., VanDeveer, S.D. and Jäger, J. (2001) Environmental assessments: four underappreciated elements of design. Global Environmental Change 11, 311-333.
12. Gieryn, T.F. (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48, 781-795.
13. Gieryn, T.F. (1995) Boundaries of science. In: Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Peterson, J.C. and Pinch, T.J. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 393-443.
14. Glynn, S., Cunningham, P. and Flanagan, K. (2003) Typifying Scientific Advisory Structures and Scientific Advice Production Methodologies: Final Report. PREST, Manchester, UK.
15. Guston, D.H. (2001) Toward a 'best practice' of constructing 'serviceable truths'. In: Hisschemöller, M., Hoppe, R., Dunn, W.N. and Ravetz, J.R. (eds) Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp. 97-118.
16. Herring, M. (1999) Introduction. In: Johnson, K.N., Swanson, F., Herring, M. and Greene, S. (eds) Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 1-8.
17. Jasanoff, S. (1987) Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science 17, 195-230.
18. Jasanoff, S. (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
19. Jasanoff, S. and Wynne, B. (1998) Science and decisionmaking. In: Rayner, S. and Malone, E.L. (eds) Human Choice and Climate Change. Vol. 1: The Societal Framework. Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 1-87.
20. Johnson, K.N. and Herring, M. (1999) Understanding bioregional assessments. In: Johnson, K.N., Swanson, F., Herring, M. and Greene, S. (eds) Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 341-376.
21. Keating, T.J. and Farrell, A. (1999) Transboundary Environmental Assessment: Lessons from the Ozone Transport Assessment Group. Technical Report NCEDR/99-02, NCEDR, Knoxville, Tennessee.
22. Knott, J.H. and Wildavsky, A. (1980) If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem?. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1, 537-574.
23. Machida, D.T. (1999) Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: policy review. In: Johnson, K.N., Swanson, F., Herring, M. and Greene, S. (eds) Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 330-338.
24. Meidinger, E. and Shannon, M. (1996) The Southern Appalachian Ecosystem Assessment: Overview case study prepared for the Rennsalaerville Science and Policy Seminar, USDA Forest Service, 4-6 June 1996. Mimeo, Buffalo, New York.
25. Miller, C.A., Jasanoff, S., Long, M., Clark, W.C., Dickson, N., Iles, A. and Parris, T.M. (1997) Shaping knowledge, defining uncertainty: the dynamic role of assessments. In: Clark, W.C., McCarthy, J.J. and Shea, E. (eds) A Critical Evaluation of Global Environmental Assessments. Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 79-113.
26. Mitchell, R.B., Clark, W.C., Cash, D.W. and Alcock, F. (2004) Science, scientists, and the policy process: lessons from global environmental assessments for the northwest forest. In: Arabas, K. and Bowersox, J. (eds) Forest Futures: Science, Politics and Policy for the Next Century. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland. pp. 95-111.
27. Nowotny, H. (1994) 'Wissen entsteht im Kontext der Anwendung': Theoretische und praktische Anmerkungen zum Wissenschaftstransfer. In: Apeltauer, M. (ed.) Wissen an der Börse: Bürgernahe Wissenschaft in Österreich. Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung, Vienna, Austria, pp. 31-37.
28. Pregernig, M. (2005) Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung als kulturgebundene Grenzarbeit: Vergleich der Interaktionsmuster in den USA und Österreich. In: Bogner, A. and Torgersen, H. (eds) Wozu Experten? Form und Funktion wissenschaftlicher Politikberatung in gesellschaftstheoretischer und empirischer Perspektive. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany, pp. 255-278.
29. Price, D.K. (1981) The spectrum from truth to power. In: Kuehn, T.J. and Porter, A.L. (eds) Science, Technology, and National Policy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 95-131.
30. Rein, M. and Schön, D.A. (1991) Frame-reflective policy discourse. In: Wagner, P., Weiss, C.H., Wittrock, B., and Wollmann, H. (eds) Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 262-289.
31. Rich, R.F. (1997) Measuring knowledge utilization: processes and outcomes. Knowledge and Policy 10, 11-24.
32. Ronge, V. (1989) Verwendung sozialwissenschaftlicher Ergebnisse in institutionellen Kontexten. In: Beck, U. and Bonß, W. (eds) Weder Sozialtechnologie noch Aufklärung? Analysen zur Verwendung sozialwissenschaftlichen Wissens. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, pp. 332-354.
33. Ruth, L. (2000) Conservation on the cusp: the reformation of national forest policy in the Sierra Nevada. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 18, 1-97.
34. SAMAB (1996) The Southern Appalachian Assessment, 5 vols. Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere Cooperative, Knoxville, Tennessee.
35. Stewart, W.C. (1996) Economic assessment of the ecosystem. In: Erman, D.C. (ed.) Status of the Sierra Nevada: The Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project - Volume III. Centre for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, California, pp. 973-1063.
36. van Sickle, C. (2001) Southern Appalachian case study. In: Jensen, M.E. and Bourgeron, P.S. (eds) A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments. Springer, New York, pp. 472-488.
37. Webber, D.J. (1992) The distribution and use of policy knowledge in the policy process. In: Dunn, W.N. and Kelly, R.M. (eds) Advances in Policy Studies since 1950. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, pp. 383-418.
38. Weingart, P. (1999) Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Science and Public Policy 26, 151-161.
39. Weiss, C.H. (1977) Research for policy's sake: the enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis 3, 531-545.
40. Weiss, C.H. (1980) Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1, 381-404.