The relationship between students' reading orientations and their strategic activity during a collaborative reading task

Reading Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 546-579

  Davis, Dennis S ^a   Neitzel, Carin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649764983     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02702710903256593     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ainley, M. D. (1993). Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 395-405.
2. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language, and the structure of prose (pp. 21-44). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
4. Bereiter, C., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2(2), 131-156.
5. Block, C. C., & Parris, S. R. (Eds.). (2008). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
6. Bondy, E. (1990). Seeing it their way: What children's definitions of reading tell us about improving teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 33-45.
7. Borko, H., & Eisenhart, M. (1986). Students' conceptions of reading and their reading experiences in school. The Elementary School Journal, 86(5), 589-611.
8. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
9. Canney, G., & Winograd, P. (1979). Schemata for reading and reading comprehension performance. Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois.
10. Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V., & Baldwin, L. (1990). The reading crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Durkin, D. (1978-1979).What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14(4), 481-533.
12. Guthrie, J. T., & Anderson, E. (1999). Engagement in reading: Processes of motivated, strategic, knowledgeable, social readers. In J. T. Guthrie & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Engaged reading: Processes, practices, and policy implications (pp. 17-46). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
13. Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
14. Horner, S. L., & Shwery, C. S. (2002). Becoming an engaged, self-regulated reader. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 103-109.
15. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 575-611.
16. Johns, J. (1972a). Children's concepts of reading and their reading achievement. Journal of Reading Behavior, 4(4), 56-57.
17. Johns, J. (1972b). Concepts of reading among good and poor readers. Education, 95, 58-60.
18. Keene, E. O., & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader's workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
19. Knapp, N. F. (2002). Tom and Joshua: Perceptions, conceptions, and progress in meaning-based reading instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(1), 59-98.
20. Kucan, L., & Beck, I. L. (1997). Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction, and social interaction. Review of Educational Research, 67(3), 271-299.
21. Langer, J. A. (1986). A sociocognitive perspective on literacy. In J. Langer (Eds.), Language, literacy and culture: Issues of society and schooling (pp. 1-20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Meyers, M., & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(5), 680-690.
23. Moje, E. B. (2000). "To be part of the story": The literacy practices of gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102(3), 651-690.
24. Moje, E. B., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N., & Morris, K. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107-154.
25. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Development.
26. Newman, R. S. (2002). How self-regulated learners cope with academic difficulty: The role of adaptive help seeking. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 132-138.
27. Newman, R. S., & Schwager, M. T. (1995). Students' help seeking during problem solving: Effects of grade, goal, and prior achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 352-376.
28. Padak, N. D., Vacca, R. T., & Stuart, D. (1993). Rethinking reading for children at risk. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 9, 361-368.
29. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
30. Pressley, M. (2003). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. Farstrup & J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 291-309). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
31. Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Guilford.
32. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampston, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998). Literacy instruction in 10 fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(2), 159-194.
34. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Office of Education Research and Improvement.
35. Rasinski, T. V., & DeFord, D. E. (1988). First graders' conceptions of literacy: A matter of schooling. Theory Into Practice, 27(1), 53-61.
36. Ruddell, R. B., & Unrau, N. J. (2004). Reading as a meaning-construction process: The reader, the text, and the teacher. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (Vol. 5). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
37. Schommer, M. (1994). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning. In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 25-40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Scott, M. M., & Hattfield, J. G. (1985). Problems of analyst and observer agreement in naturalistic narrative data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 207-218.
39. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
40. Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System. (2007). System and school trend analyses. Retrieved from https://tvaas.sas.com/evaas/welcome.jsp
41. Van Den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers' goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory and Cognition, 29(8), 1081-1087.
42. Weintraub, S., & Denny, T. P. (1965). What do beginning first-graders say about reading? Childhood Education, 41(6), 326-327.
43. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
44. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.