Balance between calibration objectives in a conceptual hydrological model;Equilibre entre objectifs de calage dans un modèle hydrologique conceptuel

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1017-1032

  Booij, Martijn J ^a   Krol, Maarten S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Calibration objectives*Combined rank measure*Parameter identifiability*Model validation*HBV model*Meuse basin

Indexed keywords

HIGH FLOW; HYDROGRAPHS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; LOW FLOW; MODEL VALIDATION; OPTIMUM BALANCE; PARAMETER IDENTIFIABILITY; SINGLE OBJECTIVE; VALIDATION TEST; WATER BALANCE;

CATCHMENTS; CLIMATE MODELS; RUNOFF;

CALIBRATION;

CALIBRATION; CATCHMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FLOW MODELING; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERIZATION; WATER BUDGET;

MEUSE BASIN;

HEPATITIS B VIRUS;

EID: 78649753940     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2010.505892     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akhtar, M., Ahmad, N. & Booij, M. J. (2008) The impact of climate change on the water resources of Hindukush-Karakorum- Himalaya region under different glacier coverage scenarios. J. Hydrol. 355, 148-163.
2. Akhtar, M., Ahmad, N. & Booij, M. J. (2009) Use of regional climate model simulations as input for hydrological models for the Hindukush-Karakorum-Himalaya region. Hydrol. Earth System Sci. 13, 1075-1089.
3. Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Parent, E. & Bárdossy, A. (2010) The Court of Miracles of Hydrology: can failure stories contribute to hydrological science? Hydrol. Sci. J. 55(6), 849-856 (this issue).
4. Ashagrie, A. G., De Laat, P. J. M., De Wit, M. J. M., Tu, M. & Uhlenbrook, S. (2006) Detecting the influence of land use changes on discharges and floods in the Meuse River Basin - the predictive power of a ninety-year rainfall-runoff relation? Hydrol. Earth System Sci. 10, 691-701.
5. Bastidas, L. A., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Shuttleworth, W. J. & Yang, Z. L. (1999) Sensitivity analysis of a land surface scheme using multicriteria methods. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 104, 19481-19490.
6. Bergström, S. (1995) The HBV model. In: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology (V. P. Singh, ed.), 443-476. Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications.
7. Booij, M. J. (2005) Impact of climate change on river flooding assessed with different spatial model resolutions. J. Hydrol. 303, 176-198.
8. Cheng, C. T.,Wu, X.Y.& Chau, K.W. (2005) Multiple criteria rainfall- runoff model calibration using a parallel genetic algorithm in a cluster of computers. Hydrol. Sci. J. 50(6), 1069-1087.
9. Cloke, H. L. & Pappenberger, F. (2009) Ensemble flood forecasting: a review. J. Hydrol. 375, 613-626.
10. Deckers, D. L. E. H., Booij, M. J., Rientjes, T. H. M. & Krol, M. S. (2010) Catchment variability and parameter estimation in multiobjective regionalisation of a rainfall-runoff model. Water Resour. Manag. in press, doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9642-8.
11. De Wit, M. J. M., Van den Hurk, B., Warmerdam, P. M. M., Torfs, P. J. J. F., Roulin, E. & Van Deursen, W. P. A. (2007) Impact of climate change on low-flows in the river Meuse. Climatic Change 82, 351-372.
12. Doherty J. & Hunt, R. J. (2009) Two statistics for evaluating parameter identifiability and error reduction. J. Hydrol. 366, 119-127.
13. Duan, Q., Ajami, N. K., Gao, X. & Sorooshian, S. (2007) Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging. Adv. Water Resour. 30, 1371-1386.
14. Efstratiadis, A. & Koutsoyiannis, D. (2010) One decade of multiobjective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review. Hydrol. Sci. J. 55(1), 58-78.
15. Engeland, K. & Hisdal, H. A. (2009) Comparison of low flow estimates in ungauged catchments using regional regression and the HBV-model. Water Resour. Manag. 23, 2567-2586.
16. Fenicia, F., Savenije, H. H. G., Matgen, P. & Pfister, L. (2007a) A comparison of alternative multiobjective calibration strategies for hydrological modeling. Water Resour. Res. 43, W03434.
17. Fenicia, F., Solomatine, D. P., Savenije, H. H. G.& Matgen, P. (2007b) Soft combination of local models in a multi-objective framework. Hydrol. Earth System Sci. 11, 1797-1809.
18. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S. & Spiegelhalter D. J. (1996) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice: Interdisciplinary Statistics. London: Chapman & Hall.
19. Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K. & Martinez, G. F. (2009) Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. J. Hydrol. 377, 80-91.
20. Harlin, J. & Kung, C. (1992) Parameter uncertainty and simulation of design floods in Sweden. J. Hydrol. 137, 209-230.
21. Hundecha, Y. & Bardossy, A. (2004) Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model. J. Hydrol. 292, 281-295.
22. Khu, S. T.& Madsen, H. (2005) Multiobjective calibration with Pareto preference ordering: an application to rainfall-runoff model calibration. Water Resour. Res. 41, W03004.
23. Leander, R. & Buishand, T. A. (2007) Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows. J. Hydrol. 332, 487-496.
24. Leander, R., Buishand, T. A., Aalders, P. & De Wit, M. J. M. (2005) Estimation of extreme floods of the River Meuse using a stochastic weather generator and a rainfall-runoff model. Hydrol. Sci. J. 50(6), 1089-1103.
25. Lidén, R. & Harlin, J. (2000) Analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling performance in different climates. J. Hydrol. 238, 231-247.
26. Lindström, G. (1997) A simple automatic calibration routine for the HBV model. Nordic Hydrol. 28, 153-168.
27. Lindström,G., Johansson, B., Persson,M., Gardelin,M.& Bergström, S. (1997) Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model. J. Hydrol. 201, 272-288.
28. Madsen, H. (2000) Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall- runoff model using multiple objectives. J. Hydrol. 235, 276-288.
29. Madsen, H. (2003) Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives. Adv. Water Resour. 26, 205-216.
30. Marshall, L., Nott, D. & Sharma, A. (2007) Towards dynamic catchment modelling: a Bayesian hierarchical mixtures of experts framework. Hydrol. Processes 21, 847-861.
31. Merz, R. & Blöschl, G. (2004) Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. J. Hydrol. 287, 95-123.
32. Nash, J. E. & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10, 282-290.
33. Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Mathevet, T., Perrin, C. & Michel, C. (2006) Dynamic averaging of rainfall-runoff model simulations from complementary model parameterizations. Water Resour. Res. 42, W07410, doi:10.1029/2005WR004636.
34. Schoups, G., Hopmans, J.W., Young, C. A., Vrugt, J. A. & Wallender, W. W. (2005) Multi-criteria optimization of a regional spatiallydistributed subsurface water flow model. J. Hydrol. 311, 20-48.
35. Seibert, J. (1999) Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfall- runoff model. Agric. For. Met. 98-99, 279-293.
36. Shrestha, D. L., Kayastha, N. & Solomatine, D. P. (2009) A novel approach to parameter uncertainty analysis of hydrological models using neural networks. Hydrol. Earth System Sci. 13, 1235-1248.
37. Smakhtin, V. Y., Sami, K. & Hughes, D. A. (1998) Evaluating the performance of a deterministic daily rainfall-runoff model in a low-flow context. Hydrol. Processes 12, 797-811.
38. SMHI (1999) Integrated hydrological modelling system. Manual version 4.5. Norrköping: SMHI.
39. Sorooshian, S. & Gupta, V. K. (1995) Model calibration. In: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology (V. P. Singh, ed.), 23-68. Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications.
40. Steele-Dunne, S., Lynch, P., McGrath, R., Semmler, T., Wang, S. Y., Hanafin, J. & Nolan, P. (2008) The impacts of climate change on hydrology in Ireland. J. Hydrol. 356, 28-45.
41. Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V. & Sorooshian, S. (1998) Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models. J. Hydrol. 204, 83-97.
42. Yu, P. S. & Yang, T. C. (2000) Fuzzy multi-objective function for rainfall-runoff model calibration. J. Hydrol. 238, 1-14.
43. Yu, P. S. & Wang, Y. C. (2009) Impact of climate change on hydrological processes over a basin scale in northern Taiwan. Hydrol. Processes 23, 3556-3568.
44. Wagener, T., McIntyre, N., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S. & Gupta, H. V. (2003) Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis. Hydrol. Processes 17, 455-476.