Citation analysis of nanotechnology at the field level: Implications of R&D evaluation

Research Evaluation

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 281-290

  Rogers, Juan D ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649735342     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820210X12827366906409     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Adams, J 2005. Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact. Scientometrics, 63(3), 367-581.
2. Burrell, Q 2005. Are sleeping beauties to be expected? Scientometrics, 65(3), 381-389.
3. Clauset, A, C S Shalizi and M E J Newman 2009. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51(4), 661-703.
4. Egghe, L 2005. Power Laws in Information Production Processes: Lotkaian Informetrics. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
5. Glänzel, W and E Garfield 2004. The myth of delayed recognition. Scientist, 18(11), 8.
6. Glänzel, W and U Schoepflin 1994. A stochastic model for the ageing analyses of scientific literature. Scientometrics, 30(1), 49-64.
7. Glänzel, W and U Schoepflin 1995. A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature. Journal of Information Science, 21(1), 37-53.
8. Glänzel, W, B Thus and B Schlemmer 2004. A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication, Scientometrics, 59(1), 63-77.
9. Greenberg, S 2009. How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network. British Medical Journal, 339; b2680. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2680.
10. Heinze, T, P Shapira, J Senker and S Kuhlmann 2007. Identifying creative research accomplishments: methodology and results for nanotechnology and human genetics. Scientometrics, 70(1), 125-152.
11. Hicks, D and S Katz 2010. Equity and Excellence in Research Funding. Working paper. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology. Available from the author: dhicks@gatech.edu.
12. Katz, S 2000. Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 27(1), February, 23-36.
13. Meyer, M 2007. What do we know about innovations in nanotechnology? Some propositions about an emerging field between hype and path dependency. Scientometrics, 70(3), 779-810.
14. Porter, A and J Youtie 2009. Where does nanotechnology belong in the map of science? Nature-Nanotechnology, 4, 534-536.
15. Porter, A, J Youtie, P Shapira and D Schoeneck 2008. Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715-728.
16. Van Raan, A 2004. Sleeping Beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467-472.