Late developers and the inequity of "equitable utilization" and the harm of "do no harm"

Water International

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 707-717

  Wegerich, Kai ^a   Olsson, Oliver ^b  

^a INTERNATIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE   (Uzbekistan)

^b LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Equitable utilization; International water law rules; Late developer; No harm; Transboundary rivers

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649733230     PISSN: 02508060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2010.533345     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allan, J.A., 2003. IWRM/IWRAM: a new sanctioned discourse? Occasional Paper 30 SOAS Water Issues Study Group. London: School of Oriental and African Studies/King's College London, University of London.
2. Berlin Rules, 2004. Available from: http://www.cawater-info.net/library/eng/l/berlin_rules.pdf [Accessed April 2010].
3. Boelens, R., 2008. The rules of the game and the game of the rules: normalization and resistance in Andean water control. PhD thesis. Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
4. Bourne, C., 2004. ILA Berlin Conference 2004 - water resources committee report - dissenting opinion. Available from: http://www.internationalwaterlaw.org/documents/intldocs/ila_berlin_rules_dissent.html [Accessed April 2010].
5. Caflisch, L., 1998. Regulation of the uses of international watercourses. In: S. Salman and L. Boisson de Chazournes, eds. International watercourses-enhancing cooperation and managing conflict. World Bank Technical Paper No. 414, 3-16. Washington, DC: World Bank.
6. Cascao, A.E., 2008. Ethiopia - challenges to Egyptian hegemony in the Nile Basin. Water Policy, 10 (Supplement 2), 13-28.
7. Daoudy, M., 2008. Hydro-hegemony and international water law: laying claims to water rights.Water Policy, 10 (Supplement 2), 89-102.
8. Dellapenna, J.W., 2001. Water rights and international law. In: P. Clark and S. Magee, eds. The Iraqi marshlands: a human and environmental study. The AMAR International Charitable Foundation, 222-236. Available from: http://ocha-gwapps1.unog.ch/rw/RWFiles2003.nsf/FilesByRWDocUNIDFileName/OCHA-64CRQ4-amar-irq-30nov.pdf/$File/amar-irq-30nov.pdf [Accessed April 2010].
9. Dore, R.P., 1971. The late development effect. IDS Communication Paper No. 103. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
10. Esteva, G., 1992. Development. In: W. Sachs, ed. The development dictionary. London: Zed Books, 6-25.
11. Frank, A.G., 1966. The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 18(4), 23-28.
12. Friedberger, M., 2000. The rural-urban fringe in the late twentieth century. Agricultural History, 74 (2), 502-514.
13. Hall, D., 1999. World system theory. In: A. Kuper and J. Kuper, eds. The social science encyclopaedia. London, New York: Routledge, 922-923.
14. Harrison, J., 2010. Networks of connectivity, territorial fragmentation, uneven development: the new politics of city-regionalism. Political Geography, 29 (1), 17-27.
15. Helsinki Rules, 1966. Available from: http://www.colsan.edu.mx/investigacion/aguaysociedad/proyectofrontera/Helsinki%20Rules%201966.pdf [Accessed April 2010].
16. House, J.W., 1982. Frontier on the Rio Grande: a political geography of development and social deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Lake, D.A., 2008. International political economy - a maturing interdiscipline. In: B.R. Weingast and D.A. Wittman, eds. The Oxford handbook of political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 757-777.
18. Libert, B., Orolbaev, E., and Steklov, Y., 2008. Water and energy crisis in Central Asia. China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 6 (3), 9-20.
19. McCaffrey, S.C., 1998. The UN convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses: prospects and pitfalls. In: S. Salman and L. Boisson de Chazournes, eds. International watercourses-enhancing cooperation and managing conflict. World Bank Technical Paper No. 414, 17-28. Washington, DC: World Bank.
20. McCaffrey, S.C., 2000. The Harmon Doctrine one hundred years later: buried, not praised. Natural Resources Journal, 36 (3), 549-589.
21. McCaffrey, S.C. and Neville, K.J., 2010. The politics of sharing water: international law, sovereignty, and transboundary rivers and aquifers. In: K. Wegerich and J. Warner, eds. Politics of water: a survey. London and New York: Routledge, 18-44.
22. Martinez, O.J., 1994. Border people: life and society in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
23. Mehtonen, K., Keskinen, M., and Varis, O., 2008. The Mekong: IWRM and institutions. In: O. Varis, C. Tortajada, and A.K. Biswas, eds. Management of transboundary rivers and lakes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 207-226.
24. Mitsuo, O., 1982. The sociology of development and issues surrounding late development. International Studies Quarterly, 26 (4), 596-622.
25. North, D.C., 2008. What is missing from political economy. In: B.R. Weingast and D.A. Wittman, eds. The Oxford handbook of political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1003-1009.
26. Peacock, W.G., Hoover, G.A., and Killian, C.D., 1988. Divergence and convergence in international development: a decomposition analysis of inequality in the world system. American Sociological Review, 53 (6), 838-852.
27. Rahaman, M.M. and Varis, O., 2009. Integrated water management of the Brahmaputra basin: perspectives and hope for regional development. Natural Resources Forum, 33, 60-75.
28. Sadoff, C.W. and Grey, D., 2005. A continuum for securing and sharing benefits. Water International, 30 (4), 420-427.
29. Salman, S., 2006. A new breed of claims, claimants, and settlement institutions. Water International, 31 (1), 2-11.
30. Salman, S., 2007a. The Helsinki Rules, the UN Watercourses Convention and the Berlin Rules: perspectives on international water law. Water Resources Development, 23 (4), 625-640.
31. Salman, S., 2007b. The United Nations Watercourses Convention ten years later: why has its entry into force proven difficult? Water International, 32 (1), 1-15.
32. Salman, S., 2010. Downstream riparians can also harm upstream riparians: the concept of foreclosure of future uses. Water International, 35 (4), 350-364.
33. UN Convention, 1997. Convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses. Available from: http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/8_3_1997.pdf [Accessed April 2010].
34. Wahl, R.W., 1994. Market transfers of water in California. North Western Journal of Environmental Law, Policy and Thought, 1 (1), 49-69.
35. Wallerstein, I., 1974. The modern world-system I. New York: Academic Press.
36. Waterbury, J., 2002. The Nile basin. National determinants and collective action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
37. Wegerich, K., 2008. Hydro-hegemony in the Amu Darya basin. Water Policy. 10 (Supplement 2), 71-88.
38. Wegerich, K., Olsson, O., and Froebrich, J., 2007. Reliving the past in a changed environment: Hydropower ambitions, opportunities and constraints in Tajikistan. Energy Policy, 35, 3815-3825.
39. Zeitoun, M. and Warner, J., 2006. Hydro-hegemony - a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8, 435-460.